Medication eluting devices for the field of OBGYN (MEDOBGYN): 3D printed biodegradable hormone eluting constructs, a proof of concept study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Tappa, Karthik ^a   Jammalamadaka, Udayabhanu ^a   Ballard, David H ^a   Bruno, Todd ^b   Israel, Marissa R ^c   Vemula, Harika ^d   Meacham, J Mark ^e   Mills, David K ^f   Woodard, Pamela K ^a   Weisman, Jeffery A ^g  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^f Louisiana Tech University   (United States)

^g WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; LUCIFERASE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; PROGESTERONE; BIOMATERIAL; POLYESTER;

3D PRINTED BIODEGRADABLE HORMONE ELUTING CONSTRUCT; ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ELISA KIT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GYNECOLOGICAL AND OBSTETRIC THERAPEUTIC DEVICE; HORMONE RELEASE; LUCIFERASE ASSAY; MORPHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; X RAY DIFFRACTION; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; CHEMISTRY; DEVICES; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; SURGICAL MESH; VAGINA PESSARY;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESTROGENS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; PESSARIES; POLYESTERS; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROGESTERONE; SURGICAL MESH;

EID: 85027279668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182929     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Banks J. Adding value in additive manufacturing: Researchers in the United Kingdom and Europe look to 3D printing for customization. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(6):22–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013. 2279617 PMID: 24233187
2. Mertz L. Dream it, design it, print it in 3-D: What can 3-D printing do for you? IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4(6):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2013.2279616 PMID: 24233186
3. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014; 86(7):3240–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r PMID: 24432804
4. Cui X, Boland T, D’Lima DD, Lotz MK. Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2012; 6(2):149–55. PMID: 22436025
5. Duan B, Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Butcher JT. 3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 May; 101(5):1255–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34420 PMID: 23015540
6. Kailasam C, Cahill D. Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Jan; 2:293–302. PMID: 19920976
7. Programme UND, Fund UNP, Organization WH, Bank W, Research SP of, Reproduction D and RT in H. Long-term reversible contraception. Contraception. Elsevier; 2017 Jan 19; 56(6):341–52.
8. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007. p. 1027–38.
9. Roehl B, Buchanan EM. Urinary incontinence evaluation and the utility of pessaries in older women. Care Manag J. 2006 Jan; 7(4):213–7. PMID: 17194058
10. Weisman JA, Nicholson JC, Tappa K, Jammalamadaka U, Wilson CG, Mills DK. Antibiotic and chemotherapeutic enhanced three-dimensional printer filaments and constructs for biomedical applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Jan; 10:357–70. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S74811 PMID: 25624758
11. Espey E, Ogburn T. Long-term reversible contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 March; 117(3):705–719. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG. 0b013e31820ce2f0 PMID: 21343774
12. Edelman D, Berger G, Keith L. Intrauterine Devices and their complications. Dordrechr: Springer Netherlands; 1979. 263 p.
13. Weisman JA, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Nicholson JC, Ballard DH, Wilson CG, et al. 3D printing antibiotic and chemotherapeutic eluting catheters and constructs. J Vasc Interv Radiol. Elsevier; 2015 Feb 2; 26(2):S12.
14. Ballard DH, Weisman JA, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Alexander JS, Griffen FD. Three-dimensional printing of bioactive hernia meshes: In vitro proof of principle. Surgery. 2017 Jun; 161(6):1479–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.033 PMID: 27726915
15. Tudela F, Kelley R, Ascher-Walsh C, Stone JL. Low Cost 3D Printing for the Creation of Cervical Cerc-lage Pessary Used to Prevent Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May; 127:154S.
16. Hakim J, Oluyemisi A, Buskmiller C, Krishnamurthy R, Cohn W, Dietrich JE. Innovative Use of 3D Printers in Gynecology. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. Elsevier; 2015 Apr; 28(2):e67.
17. Cunha JAM, Mellis K, Sethi R, Siauw T, Sudhyadhom A, Garg A, et al. Evaluation of PC-ISO for customized, 3D Printed, gynecologic 192-Ir HDR brachytherapy applicators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Jan 8; 16(1):5168. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5168 PMID: 25679174
18. Ricotti R, Vavassori A, Bazani A, Ciardo D, Pansini F, Spoto R, et al. 3D-printed applicators for high dose rate brachytherapy: Dosimetric assessment at different infill percentage. Phys Medica. 2016 Dec 1; 32(12):1698–706.
19. Sethi R, Cunha A, Mellis K, Siauw T, Diederich C, Pouliot J, et al. Clinical applications of custom-made vaginal cylinders constructed using three-dimensional printing technology. J Contemp Brachytherapy. Termedia Publishing; 2016 Jun; 8(3):208–14. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.60679 PMID: 27504130
20. Laronda MM, Rutz AL, Xiao S, Whelan KA, Duncan FE, Roth EW, et al. A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nature Communications. 2017 May 16; 8:15261. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15261 PMID: 28509899