Interprofessional online learning for primary healthcare: Findings from a scoping review

BMJ Open

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Reeves, Scott ^a   Fletcher, Simon ^a   Mcloughlin, Clodagh ^b   Yim, Alastair ^c   Patel, Kunal D ^a,b  

^a KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Research and Advocacy   (Ireland)

^c ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

interprofessional collaboration; Interprofessional education; online learning; primary health care; scoping review

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SKILL; THEORETICAL MODEL; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; STANDARDS;

ACCREDITATION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; LEARNING; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 85027254246     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016872     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, et al. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-Analysis. JAMA 2008; 300: 1181-96.
2. Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, et al A Meta-Analysis and review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Centre for Technology in Learning, 2010. https://.www2. ed. gov/.rschstat/.eval/.tech/.evidence-based-practices/.finalreport.pdf
3. MacNeill H, Telner D, Sparaggis-Agaliotis A, et al. All for one and one for all: understanding health professionals experience in individual versus collaborative online learning. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2014; 34: 102-11.
4. Thomas AU, Fried GP, Johnson P, et al. Sharing best practices through online communities of practice: a case study. Hum Resour Health 2010; 8: 25.
5. Sutton KP, Maybery D, Moore T. Creating a sustainable and effective mental health workforce for Gippsland, Victoria: solutions and directions for strategic planning. Rural Remote Health 2011; 11: 1585.
6. Lillis S, Gibbons V, Lawrenson R. The experience of final year medical students undertaking a general practice run with a distance education component. Rural Remote Health 2010; 10: 1268.
7. Murphy CJ. Focusing on the essentials: learning for performance. Hum Resour Health 2008; 6: 26-30.
8. Maloney S, Nicklen P, Rivers G, et al A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Blended Versus Face-To-Face Delivery of Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17: e182.
9. Roberts T. McInnerney J seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Education, Technology and Society 2007; 10: 257-68.
10. Sivamalai S, Murthy SV, Gupta TS, et al. Teaching pathology via online digital microscopy: positive learning outcomes for rurally based medical students. Aust J Rural Health 2011; 19: 45-51.
11. Reeves S. Freeth D New forms of information technology, new forms of collaboration?. Leathard A, ed. Interprofessional Collaboration: from policy to practice in Health and Social Care. London: Routledge, 2003.
12. Snowdon A, Shell J, Leitch K. Innovation takes leadership: opportunities & challenges for Canadas Health Care System: Ivey Centre for health Innovation and Leadership, 2010. http://worl dhea lthinno vationnetwork .com/images/.publ icat ions /.whi tepa per s/.I nnov ationTak esLeadership-.WhitePaper.pdf
13. Hanna E, Soren B, Telner D, et al. Flying blind: the experience of online interprofessional facilitation. J Interprof Care 2013; 27: 298-304.
14. Arksey H, OMalley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8: 19-32.
15. Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien KK, et al. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 69.
16. Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, et al. Scoping the scope of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health 2011; 33: 147-50.
17. Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional teams experience with Arksey and OMalleys framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 48.
18. Raymond M, Iliffe S, Pickett J. Checkists to evaluate an e-learning resource. Educ Prim Care 2012; 23: 458-9.
19. Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, et al. Effective interprofessional education: argument assumption and evidence.oxford: Blackwell, 2005. http://.eu. wiley.com/.WileyCDA/.WileyTitle/.productCd-1405116544.html
20. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10(S1): 6-20.
21. Docherty A, Sandhu H. Student-perceived barriers and facilitators to e-learning in continuing professional development in primary care. Educ Prim Care 2006; 17: 343-53.
22. Jenkins MS, Bean WG, Luke K. Part-Time, e-learning interprofessional pain management education for the primary and community care setting. Br J Pain 2014; 8: 16-26.
23. Russell J, Elton L, Swinglehurst D, et al. Using the online environment in assessment for learning: a case-study of a webbased course in primary care. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2006; 31: 465-78.
24. Rudolf MC, Hunt C, George J, et al. HENRY: development, pilot and long-Term evaluation of a programme to help practitioners work more effectively with parents of babies and pre-school children to prevent childhood obesity. Child Care Health Dev 2010; 36: 850-7.
25. Hannon K, Peters S, Fisher L, et al. Developing resources to support the diagnosis and management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME) in primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 1-12.
26. James J, Atkins H, Sturgess I, et al. The safe use of insulin e-learning module: successful roll out of a teaching programme for all working in diabetes. Practical Diabetes International 2011; 28: 209-11.
27. Marsh-Tootle WL, McGwin G, Kohler CL, et al. Efficacy of a webbased intervention to improve and sustain knowledge and screening for amblyopia in primary care settings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7160-7.
28. Robinson T, Hills D, Kelly B. The evaluation of an online orientation to rural mental health practice in Australia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2011; 18: 629-36.
29. Halabisky B, Humbert J, Stodel EJ, et al. eLearning, knowledge brokering, and nursing: strengthening collaborative practice in longterm care.comput Inform Nurs 2010; 28: 264-73.
30. Stacey E, Gerbic P. Effective Blended Learning Practices: Evidenceevidence-Basedbased Perspectivesperspectives. Hershey NY: IGI Global, 2009.
31. Henderson S, Dalton M, Cartmel J. Using Interprofessional Learning for Continuing Education: Development and Evaluation of the Graduate Certificate Program in Health Professional Education for Clinicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2016; 36: 211-7.
32. van der Rhee B, Verma R, Plaschka GR, et al. Technology Readiness, Learning Goals, and eLearning: Searching for Synergy. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 2007; 5: 127-49.
33. MacDonald S, Mwapasa V, Petersen M, et al. The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership. In: Byrne E, Donaldson L, Manda-Taylor L. Global Health. vol 12, 2016: 19.
34. Curran V, Reid A, Reis P, et al. The use of information and communications technologies in the delivery of interprofessional education: A review of evaluation outcome levels. J Interprof Care 2015; 29: 541-50.
35. Pauze E, Reeves S. Examining the effects of interprofessional education on mental health providers: Findings from an updated systematic review. J Ment Health 2010; 19: 258-71.
36. Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, et al A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Med Teach 2016; 38: 656-68.
37. Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013: CD002213.
38. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al.accuracy of physician self-Assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1094-102.