Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1249-1256

  Colquhoun, Heather L ^a   Jesus, Tiago S ^b   O'Brien, Kelly K ^a,c   Tricco, Andrea C ^a,d   Chui, Adora ^a   Zarin, Wasifa ^d   Lillie, Erin ^d   Hitzig, Sander L ^a,e   Straus, Sharon ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTO DE HIGIENE E MEDICINA TROPICAL   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e Canada   (Canada)

Author keywords

knowledge synthesis; Methodology; quality of reporting; rehabilitation science; scoping review

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; EXERCISE; EXTRACTION; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION; REHABILITATION; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SCREENING; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; LITERATURE;

HUMANS; REHABILITATION; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 85027103167     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215516688514     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Jesus TS., Systematic reviews and clinical trials in rehabilitation: Comprehensive analyses of publication trends. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97 (11): 1853-1862. e1852.
2. Mayo NE, Kaur N, Barbic SP, et al. How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in clinical rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years? Clin Rehabil 2016; 30 (9): 847-864.
3. Snell K, Hassan A, Sutherland L, et al. Types and quality of physical therapy research publications: Has there been a change in the past decade? Physiother Can 2014; 66 (4): 382-391.
4. Chevan J, Haskvitz EM., Reported characteristics of participants in physical therapy-related clinical trials. Phys Ther 2015; 95 (6): 884-890.
5. Yamato T, Maher C, Saragiotto B, et al. The TIDieR checklist will benefit the physical therapy profession. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46 (6): 402-404.
6. Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT, Hoffmann TC, Moseley AM., How completely are physiotherapy interventions described in reports of randomised trials? Physiotherapy 2016; 102 (2): 121-126.
7. Gianola S, Gasparini M, Agostini M, et al. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2013; 93 (11): 1456-1466.
8. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016; 16 (1): 1.
9. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67 (12): 1291-1294.
10. O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Advancing scoping study methodology: A web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 (1): 305.
11. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB., Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evidence-Based Healthcare 2015; 13 (3): 141-146.
12. Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G., Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43 (9): 765-769.
13. Wade D., Complexity, case-mix and rehabilitation: The importance of a holistic model of illness. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25 (5): 387-395.
14. Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Kiekens C, et al. ISPRM discussion paper: Proposing a conceptual description of health-related rehabilitation services. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46 (1): 1-6.
15. Delitto A., Pragmatic clinical trials: Implementation opportunity, or just another fad? Phys Ther 2016; 96 (2): 137-138.
16. Horn SD, DeJong G, Deutscher D., Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: An alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93 (8): S127-S137.
17. Jesus TS, Hoenig H., Postacute rehabilitation quality of care: Toward a shared conceptual framework. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96 (5): 960-969.
18. Arksey H, O'Malley L,. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol 2005; 8 (1): 19-32.
19. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK,. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Sci 2010; 5: 69.
20. Wilczynski NL, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Hobson N, Haynes RB., Limits of search filter development. JMLA 2016; 104 (1): 42.
21. Mimouni M, Cismariu-Potash K, Ratmansky M, Shaklai S, Amir H, Mimouni-Bloch A., Trends in physical medicine and rehabilitation publications over the past 16 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97 (6): 1030-1033.
22. Ugolini D, Neri M, Cesario A, et al. Bibliometric analysis of literature in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases rehabilitation: Growing numbers, reducing impact factor. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94 (2): 324-331. e321.
23. World Health Organization. World report on disability. World Health Organization, 2011.
24. Daudt HM, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ., Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13 (1): 1.
25. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Res 2005; 15 (9): 1277-1288.