Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation

Physical Therapy

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1456-1466

  Gianola, Silvia ^a   Gasparini, Monica ^b   Agostini, Michela ^c   Castellini, Greta ^d   Corbetta, Davide ^e   Gozzer, Paolo ^f   Li, Linda C ^g   Sirtori, Valeria ^e   Taricco, Mariangela ^h   Tetzlaff, Jennifer M ⁱ   Turolla, Andrea ^j   Moher, David ⁱ   Moja, Lorenzo ^k  

^a IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI   (Italy)

^b Department of Rehabilitation ^*  (Italy)

^c IRCCS SAN CAMILLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d Alta Valle Intelvi   (Italy)

^e SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f APSS   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

ⁱ OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^j IRCCS Fondazione Ospedale San Camillo   (Italy)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; REHABILITATION; STANDARDS; ARTICLE; STANDARD;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FINANCIAL SUPPORT; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84887109972     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120382     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. MacDermid JC, Graham ID. Knowledge translation: Putting the "practice" in evidence-based practice. Hand Clin. 2009; 25:125-143.
2. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Glossary. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://hand book.cochrane.org/. Accessed April 2012.
3. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Terminology. In: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151: 264-269.
4. Young C, Horton R. Putting clinical trials into context. Lancet. 2005;366:980.
5. Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, Maher CG. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48:43-49.
6. Paci M, Briganti G, Lombardi B. Levels of evidence of articles published in physical and rehabilitation medicine journals. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:264-267.
7. Grimby G. Top cited articles in rehabilitation: Additional list of articles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1960-1961.
8. Zaina F, Negrini S. EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: News from July to December 2011. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011; 47:601-605.
9. Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, et al. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: Survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1021-1030.
10. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1271-1278.
11. Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, et al. Exter-nal validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One. 2007;2:e1350.
12. Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4: 447-455.
13. McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, et al. The medical review article revisited: Has the science improved? Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:947-951.
14. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: State of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106:485-488.
15. Jadad AR, McQuay HJ. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:235-243.
16. Shea B, Moher D, Graham I, et al. A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25:116-129.
17. Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:450-455.
18. Cornelius VR, Perrio MJ, Shakir SAW, Smith LA. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: A survey of their conduct and reporting quality. Phar-macoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:1223-1231.
19. Altman DG, Simera I. Responsible reporting of health research studies: Transparent, complete, accurate and timely. J Anti-microb Chemother. 2010;65:1-3.
20. Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Hand-book for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005.
21. Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd, 2012.
22. Me SH. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh. Accessed September 2011.
23. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from MEDLINE: Analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330:68-71.
24. Paci M, Cigna C, Baccini M, Rinaldi LA. Types of articles published in physiotherapy journals: A quantitative analysis. Physiother Res Int. 2009;14:203-212.
25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6: e1000097.
26. Harris R, Millard JB. Paraffin-wax baths in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1955;14:278-282.
27. Coyer AB, Curwen IH. Low back pain treated by manipulation; A controlled series. Br Med J. 1955;19:705-707.
28. Hovell M. The experimental evidence for weight-loss treatment of essential hypertension: A critical review. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:359-368.
29. Costa LO, Maher CG, Lopes AD, et al. Transparent reporting of studies relevant to physical therapy practice. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:267-271.
30. van den Ende CHM, Steultjens EMJ, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Clinical heterogeneity was a common problem in Cochrane reviews of physiotherapy and occupational therapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:914-919.
31. Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.
32. Latif LA, Amadera JED, Pimentel D, et al. Sample Size calculation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A systematic review of reporting, characteristics, and results in randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:306-315.
33. Basu S, Roberts C, Newble DI, Snaith ML. Comparing and contrasting undergraduate competence in musculoskeletal medicine with cardiovascular medicine and neurology. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1398-1401.
34. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: http://www.oecd.org. Accessed September 2011.
35. Clark S, Horton R. Putting research into context: Revisited. Lancet. 2010;376:10-11.
36. Banzi R, Cinquini M, Liberati A, et al. Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: Prospective cohort analysis. BMJ. 2011;343:d5856.
37. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed April 2012.
38. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting system-atic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2700.