Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 364, Issue 11, 2017, Pages

  Siegesmund, Amy ^a  

^a PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Metacognition; Self assessment; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

AUTOREGULATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; METACOGNITION; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; SCHOOL; SELF EVALUATION; STUDENT; EDUCATION; MICROBIOLOGY;

HUMANS; LEARNING; METACOGNITION; MICROBIOLOGY; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS;

EID: 85026814447     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx096     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Ambrose SA, Kirst MW, Lovett MC et al. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education A Call to Action. Washington, DC: AAAS, 2011
3. Andrade MS. Learning communities: examining positive outcomes. J Coll Stud Retent 2007;9:1-20
4. Bain K. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004
5. Bercher DA. Self-monitoring tools and student academic success: when perception matches reality. J Coll Sci Teach 2012;41:26-32
6. Black P, William D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ 1998;5:7-74
7. Black P, William D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ Assess Eval Acc 2009;21:5-31
8. Brazeal KR, Couch BA. Student buy-in toward formative assessments: the influence of student factors and importance for course success. JMBE 2017;18:1-10
9. Butler DL, Winne PH. Feedback and Self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 1999;65:245-81
10. Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. Flawed self-assessment. Psychol Sci Publ Int 2004;5:69-106
11. Dunning D, Johnson K, Ehrlinger J et al. Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2003;12: 83-7
12. Ibabe I, Jauregizar J. Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. High Educ 2010;59: 243-58
13. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77: 1121-34
14. Lovett MC. Make exams worthmore than the grade: using exam wrappers to promote metacognition. In: Kaplan M (ed.). Using Reflection and Metacognition to Improve Student Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing, 2013, 18-52
15. Mair C. Using technology for enhancing reflective writing, metacognition and learning. J Furth High Educ 2012;36: 147-67
16. McMillan JH, Hearn J. Student self-assessment: the key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educ Horiz 2008;87:40-9
17. Merkel SM. American Society for Microbiology resources in support of an evidence-based approach to teaching microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Let 2016, DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw172
18. Mynlieff M, Manogaran AL, St Maurice M et al. Writing assignments with a Metacognitive Component enhance learning in a large introductory biology course. CBE Life Sci Educ 2014:13:311-21
19. Science Education Initiative. Framing the interactive classroom. 2013 http://www.colorado.edu/sei/fac-resources/framing.html (3 May 2017, date last accessed)
20. Siegesmund A. Increasing student metacognition and learning through classroom-based learning communities and selfassessment. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2016;17:204-14
21. Tanner KD. Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sci Educ 2012;11:113-20
22. Wiggins GJ, McTighe J. Understanding by Design. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2005