The zahn drawings: New illustrations of xenopus embryo and tadpole stages for studies of craniofacial development

Development (Cambridge)

Volumn 144, Issue 15, 2017, Pages 2708-2713

  Zahn, Natalya ^a   Levin, Michael ^b   Adams, Dany Spencer ^b  

^a Tufts University ^*  (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Craniofacial patterning; Embryonic development; Stage series; Xenopus laevis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; DRAWING; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TADPOLE; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ANIMAL; EMBRYOLOGY; FACE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARVA; METABOLISM; METAMORPHOSIS; NONMAMMALIAN EMBRYO; PHYSIOLOGY; SKULL; XENOPUS;

ANIMALS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FACE; LARVA; METAMORPHOSIS, BIOLOGICAL; SKULL; XENOPUS;

EID: 85026786863     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: 14779129     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.151308     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abu-Daya, A., Khokha, M. K. and Zimmerman, L. B. (2012). The Hitchhiker’s guide to Xenopus genetics. Genesis 50, 164-175.
2. Adams, D. S. (2008). A new tool for tissue engineers: ions as regulators of morphogenesis during development and regeneration. Tissue Eng. 14, 1461-1468.
3. Adams, D. S., Lemire, J. M., Kramer, R. H. and Levin, M. (2014). Optogenetics in Developmental Biology: using light to control ion flux-dependent signals in Xenopus embryos. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 58, 851-861.
4. Cross, M. K. and Powers, M. A. (2009). Learning about cancer from frogs: analysis of mitotic spindles in Xenopus egg extracts. Dis. Model. Mech. 2, 541-547.
5. Duncan, A. R. and Khokha, M. K. (2016). Xenopus as a model organism for birth defects-Congenital heart disease and heterotaxy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 51, 73-79.
6. Goyos, A. and Robert, J. (2009). Tumorigenesis and anti-tumor immune responses in Xenopus. Front. Biosci. 14, 167-176.
7. Hardwick, L. J. A. and Philpott, A. (2015). An oncologists friend: how Xenopus contributes to cancer research. Dev. Biol. 408, 180-187.
8. Heikkila, J. J., Kaldis, A., Morrow, G. and Tanguay, R. M. (2007). The use of the Xenopus oocyte as a model system to analyze the expression and function of eukaryotic heat shock proteins. Biotechnol. Adv. 25, 385-395.
9. Henry, J. J., Wever, J. M., Vergara, M. N. and Fukui, L. (2008). Xenopus, an ideal vertebrate system for studies of eye development and regeneration. In Animal Models for Eye Research (ed. P. A. Tsonis), pp. 57-91. London, UK: Acadmic Press.
10. Jacox, L. A., Dickinson, A. J. and Sive, H. (2014). Facial transplants in Xenopus laevis embryos. J. Vis. Exp. 85, e50697.
11. James-Zorn, C., Ponferrada, V. G., Burns, K. A., Fortriede, J. D., Lotay, V. S., Liu, Y., Brad Karpinka, J., Karimi, K., Zorn, A. M. and Vize, P. D. (2015). Xenbase: core features, data acquisition, and data processing. Genesis 53, 486-497.
12. Kaltenbrun, E., Tandon, P., Amin, N. M., Waldron, L., Showell, C. and Conlon, F. L. (2011). Xenopus: an emerging model for studying congenital heart disease. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 91, 495-510.
13. Kennedy, A. E. and Dickinson, A. J. (2014). Quantification of orofacial phenotypes in Xenopus. J. Vis. Exp. 93, e52062.
14. Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. and Schilling, T. F. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203,253-310.
15. Kinney, K. S. and Cohen, N. (2009). Neural-immune system interactions in Xenopus. Front. Biosci. 14, 112-129.
16. Koide, T., Hayata, T. and Cho, K. W. Y. (2005). Xenopus as a model system to study transcriptional regulatory networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4943-4948.
17. Lee-Liu, D., Mendez-Olivos, E. E., Munoz, R. and Larrain, J. (2016). The African clawed frog Xenopus laevis: a model organism to study regeneration of the Central Nervous System. Neurosci. Lett. (in press)
18. Levin, M. (2013). Reprogramming cells and tissue patterning via bioelectrical pathways: molecular mechanisms and biomedical opportunities. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 5, 657-676.
19. Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1956). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1994). Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). Oxford, UK: Taylor and Francis.
21. Pegoraro, C. and Monsoro-Burq, A. H. (2013). Signaling and transcriptional regulation in neural crest specification and migration: lessons from xenopus embryos. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 247-259.
22. Pratt, K. G. and Khakhalin, A. S. (2013). Modeling human neurodevelopmental disorders in the Xenopus tadpole: from mechanisms to therapeutic targets. Dis. Model. Mech. 6, 1057-1065.
23. Robert, J. and Cohen, N. (2011). The genus Xenopus as a multispecies model for evolutionary and comparative immunobiology of the 21st century. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 35, 916-923.
24. Robert, J. and Ohta, Y. (2009). Comparative and developmental study of the immune system in Xenopus. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1249-1270.
25. Schmitt, S. M., Gull, M. and Brandli, A. W. (2014). Engineering Xenopus embryos for phenotypic drug discovery screening. Adv. Drug Delivery. Rev. 69-70, 225-246.
26. Slack, J. M. W., Lin, G. and Chen, Y. (2008). The Xenopus tadpole: a new model for regeneration research. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 54-63.
27. Slater, B. J., Liu, K. J., Kwan, M. D., Quarto, N. and Longaker, M. T. (2009). Cranial osteogenesis and suture morphology in Xenopus laevis: a unique model system for studying craniofacial development. PLoS ONE 4, e3914.
28. Straka, H. and Simmers, J. (2012). Xenopus laevis: an ideal experimental model for studying the developmental dynamics of neural network assembly and sensory-motor computations. Dev. Neurobiol. 72, 649-663.
29. Suzuki, M., Yakushiji, N., Nakada, Y., Satoh, A., Ide, H. and Tamura, K. (2006). Limb regeneration in Xenopus laevis froglet. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 6 Suppl. 1, 26-37.
30. Takagi, C., Sakamaki, K., Morita, H., Hara, Y., Suzuki, M., Kinoshita, N. and Ueno, N. (2013). Transgenic Xenopus laevis for live imaging in cell and developmental biology. Dev. Growth Differ. 55, 422-433.
31. Tseng, A. S. and Levin, M. (2013). Cracking the bioelectric code: probing endogenous ionic controls of pattern formation. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6, e22595.
32. Vandenberg, L. N., Lemire, J. M. and Levin, M. (2013). It’s never too early to get it Right: a conserved role for the cytoskeleton in left-right asymmetry. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6, e27155.
33. Warkman, A. S. and Krieg, P. A. (2007). Xenopus as a model system for vertebrate heart development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 46-53.
34. Wheeler, G. N. and Liu, K. J. (2012). Xenopus: an ideal system for chemical genetics. Genesis 50, 207-218.