Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: concept, scalability and a role for conservation science

Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 65-73

  Scarano, Fabio Rubio ^a,b  

^a Fund o Desenvolvimento Sustentavel   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adaptive transition; Ecosystem services; Nature based solutions; Policy mix; Sustainability transitions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026779138     PISSN: 25300644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Adams, W.M., Hutton, J., People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Soc. 5 (2007), 147–183.
2. Agard, J., Schipper, E.L.F., Glossary. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1757–1776.
3. Agrawal, A., Lemos, M.C., Adaptive development. Nat. Clim. Change 5 (2015), 186–187.
4. Anadón, J.D., Sala, O.E., Maestre, F.T., Climate change will increase savannas at the expense of forests and treeless vegetation in tropical and subtropical Americas. J. Ecol. 102 (2014), 1363–1373.
5. Angelo, C., Brazilian scientists reeling as federal funds slashed by nearly half. Nature, 2017, 10.1038/nature.2017.21766.
6. Araos, M., Berrang-Ford, L., Ford, J.D., et al. Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: a systematic global assessment. Environ. Sci. Policy 66 (2016), 375–382.
7. Aronson, J., Sustainability science demands that we define our terms across diverse disciplines. Landsc. Ecol. 26 (2011), 457–460.
8. Ascher, W., Policy sciences contributions to analysis to promote sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 2 (2007), 141–149.
9. Azevedo-Santos, V.M., Fearnside, P.M., Oliveira, C.S., et al. Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil. Biodivers. Conserv., 2017, 1316–1320.
10. Bettencourt, L.M.A., Kaur, J., Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (2011), 19540–19545.
11. Biagini, B., Bierbaum, R., Stults, M., et al. A typology of adaptation actions: a global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the Global Environment Facility. Glob. Environ. Change 25 (2014), 97–108.
12. Bourne, A., Holness, S., Holden, P., et al. A socio-ecological approach for identifying and contextualising spatial ecosystem-based adaptation priorities at the sub-national level. PLOS ONE, 11(5), 2016, e0155235.
13. Brancalion, P.H.S., Garcia, L.C., Loyola, R., et al. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat. Conserv. 14:Suppl. (2016), 1–15.
14. BRASIL, Bolsa Verde: Erradicar a Extrema Pobreza e Conservar o Meio Ambiente. 2013 Brasília.
15. BRAZIL, Intended Nationally Determined Contribution: towards achieving the objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2015 http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/images/ed_desenvsust/BRASIL-iNDC-inglês.pdf.
16. Brink, E., Aalders, T., Ádám, D., et al. Cascades of green: a review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Glob. Environ. Change 36 (2016), 111–123.
17. Brown, K., Sustainable adaptation: an oxymoron?. Clim. Dev. 3 (2011), 21–31.
18. Burkett, V.R., Suarez, A.G., Bindi, M., et al. Point of departure. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 169–194.
19. Castro, F. de, Hogenboom, B., Baud, M., Introduction: environment and society in contemporary Latin America. Castro, F. de, Hogenboom, B., Baud, M., (eds.) Environmental Governance in Latin America, 2016, Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire, United Kingdom, 1–25.
20. CBD – Convention of Biological Diversity, Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. CBD Technical Series 41., 2009 Montreal, Canada.
21. Clark, W.C., Sustainability science a room of its own. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007), 1737–1738.
22. Colloff, M.J., Lavorel, S., Van Kerkhoff, L.E., et al. Transforming conservation science and practice for a post-normal world. Conserv. Biol., 2017, 10.1111/cobi.12912.
23. Costanza, R., Ecosystem services in theory and practice. Figgis, P., Mackey, B., Fitzsimons, J., Irving, J., Clark, P., (eds.) Valuing Nature: Protected Areas and Ecosystem Services, 2015, Australian Committee for IUCN, Sydney, 6–15.
24. Cunha, F.A.F.S., Börner, J., Wunder, S., et al. The implementation costs of forest conservation policies in Brazil. Ecol. Econ. 130 (2016), 209–220.
25. Dangles, O., Loirat, J., Freour, C., et al. Research on biodiversity and climate change at a distance: collaboration networks between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean. PLOS ONE, 11(6), 2016, e0157441.
26. Doak, D.F., Bakker, V.J., Goldstein, B.E., et al. What is the future of conservation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29 (2014), 77–81.
27. Doswald, N., Munroe, R., Roe, D., et al. Effectiveness of ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation: review of the evidence-base. Clim. Develop. 6 (2014), 185–281.
28. Duarte, C.M., Losada, I.J., Hendriks, I.E., et al. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3 (2013), 961–968.
29. FBPN/ICLEI, Adaptação Baseada em Ecossistemas: Oportunidades para Políticas Públicas em Mudanças Climáticas. 2nd ed., 2015, Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza, Governos Locais pela Sustentabilidade, Curitiba, Brazil.
30. Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Mach, K.J., et al. Technical summary. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 35–94.
31. Fisher, J.A., Patenaude, G., Kalpana, G., et al. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst. Serv. 7 (2014), 34–45.
32. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M., Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Res. Policy 40 (2011), 702–713.
33. Folke, C., Socio-economic dependence on the life-supporting environment. Folke, C., Kåberger, T., (eds.) Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy, 1991, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 77–94.
34. Franks, D.M., Davis, R., Bebbington, A.J., et al. Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 7576–7581.
35. Grémillet, D., Fort, J., Amélineau, F., et al. Arctic warming: non-linear impacts of sea-ice and glacier melt on seabird foraging. Glob. Change Biol. 21 (2015), 1116–1123.
36. Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495 (2013), 305–307.
37. Grima, N., Singh, S.J., Smetschka, B., Ringhofer, L., Payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Latin America: analyzing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosyst. Serv. 17 (2016), 24–32.
38. Hess, D.J., Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective. Res. Policy 43 (2014), 278–283.
39. Hoehne, N., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., et al. The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions. Clim. Policy 17 (2017), 16–32.
40. Hof, A.F., den Elzen, M.G.J., Admiraal, A., et al. Global and regional abatement costs of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C. Environ. Sci. Policy 71 (2017), 30–40.
41. Hutchings, P., Chan, M.Y., Cuadrado, L., et al. A systematic review of success factors in the community management of rural water supplies over the past 30 years. Water Policy 17 (2015), 963–983.
42. IPCC, Summary for policymakers. Stocker, T.F., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3–29.
43. IPCC, Summary for policymakers. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–32.
44. Kareiva, P., New conservation: setting the record straight and finding common ground. Conserv. Biol. 28 (2014), 634–636.
45. Krüger, O., The role of ecotourism in conservation: panacea or Pandora's box?. Biodivers. Conserv. 14 (2005), 579–600.
46. Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., et al. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 7:Suppl. 1 (2012), 25–43.
47. Lemos, M.C., Lob, Y.-J., Nelson, D.R., et al. Linking development to climate adaptation: leveraging generic and specific capacities to reduce vulnerability to drought in NE Brazil. Glob. Environ. Change 39 (2016), 170–179.
48. Liu, J., Hull, V., Luo, J., et al. Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships. Ecol. Soc., 20(3), 2015, 44.
49. Liu, J., Hull, V., Luo, J., et al. Human–nature interactions over distances. Liu, J., et al. (eds.) Pandas and People, 2016, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 218–239.
50. Locatelli, B., Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R., Turner, R.K., (eds.) Ecosystem Services and Climate Change, 2010, Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, Routledge, London, 481–490.
51. Locatelli, B., Evans, V., Wardell, A., et al. Forest and climate change in Latin America: linking adaptation and mitigation. Forests 2 (2011), 431–450.
52. Magrin, G.O., Marengo, J.A., Boulanger, J.-P., et al. Central and South America. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1499–1566.
53. Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res. Policy 41 (2012), 955–967.
54. Martin, T.G., Watson, J.E.M., Intact ecosystems provide best defence against climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6 (2016), 122–124.
55. Mathevet, R., Thompson, J.D., Folke, C., et al. Protected areas and their surrounding territory: socioecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecol. Appl. 26 (2016), 5–16.
56. Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Alfthan, B., et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change in Caribbean small island developing states: integrating local and external knowledge. Sustainability 4 (2012), 1908–1932.
57. Metzger, J.P., Loyola, R., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Pillar, V.D., New perspectives in ecology and conservation. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15 (2017), 1–2.
58. Miller, B., Soulé, M.E., Terborgh, J., ‘New conservation’ or surrender to development?. Anim. Conserv. 17 (2014), 509–515.
59. Mittermeier, R., Baião, P.C., Barrera, L., et al. O protagonismo do Brasil no histórico acordo global de proteção à biodiversidade. Nat. Conserv. 8 (2010), 197–200.
60. Morton, J.F., Solecki, W., Dasgupta, P., et al. Urban-rural interactions – context for climate change vulnerability impacts and adaptation. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 153–155.
61. Munang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., et al. Climate change and ecosystem-based adaptation: a new pragmatic approach to buffering climate change impacts. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5 (2013), 67–71.
62. Munroe, R., Nathalie, D., Dilys, R., et al. Does EbA work? A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation. IIED Policy Briefs, 2011.
63. Munroe, R., Roe, D., Doswald, N., et al. Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change. Environ. Evid., 1, 2012, 13 http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/1/1/13.
64. Ojea, E., Challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem-based adaptation into the international climate agenda. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 41–48.
65. Oliveira, G., Lima-Ribeiro, M.S., Terribile, L.C., et al. Conservation biogeography of the Cerrado's wild edible plants under climate change: linking biotic stability with agricultural expansion. Am. J. Bot. 102 (2015), 1–8.
66. Overbeck, G.E., Vélez-Martin, E., Scarano, F.R., et al. Conservation in Brazil needs to include non-forest ecosystems. Divers. Distrib. 21 (2015), 1455–1460.
67. Pant, L.P., Adhikari, B., Bhattarai, K.K., Adaptive transition for transformations to sustainability in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 206–212.
68. Pinho, P.F., Patenaude, G., Ometto, J.P., et al. Ecosystem protection and poverty alleviation in the tropics: perspective from a historical evolution of policy-making in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecosyst. Serv. 8 (2014), 97–109.
69. Ponisio, L.C., Kremen, C., System-level approach needed to evaluate the transition to more sustainable agriculture. Proc. R. Soc. B, 283, 2016, 20152913, 10.1098/rspb.2015.2913.
70. Pramova, E., Locatelli, B., Brockhaus, M., et al. Ecosystem services in the National Adaptation Programmes of Action. Clim. Policy 12 (2012), 393–409.
71. Rael, R.C., Peterson, A.C., Ghersi, B.M., et al. Disturbance, reassembly, and disease risk in socioecological systems. Ecohealth 13 (2016), 450–455.
72. Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534 (2016), 631–639.
73. Rogge, K.S., Reichardt, K., Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Res. Policy 45 (2016), 1620–1635.
74. Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2013), 3268–3273.
75. Ruaro, R., Mormul, R.P., Anticipated changes to environmental law may jeopardize Brazilian natural resources. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15 (2017), 65–66.
76. Sá, J.C.M., Lal, R., Cerri, C.C., et al. Low-carbon agriculture in South America to mitigate global climate change and advance food security. Environ. Int. 98 (2017), 102–112.
77. Scarano, F.R., Ceotto, P., Brazilian Atlantic forest: impact, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change. Biodivers. Conserv. 24 (2015), 2319–2331.
78. Schoolman, E.D., Guest, J.S., Bush, K.F., et al. How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain. Sci. 7 (2012), 67–80.
79. Shaw, M.R., Overpeck, J.T., Midgley, G.F., Cross-chapter box on ecosystem-based approaches to adaptation – emerging opportunities. Field, C.B., et al. (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 35–94.
80. Sierra-Correa, P.C., Kintz, J.R.C., Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: a systematic review for mangrove coasts. Marine Policy 51 (2015), 385–393.
81. Silva, J.M.C., Wheeler, E., Ecosystems as infrastructure. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15 (2017), 32–35.
82. Smith, A., Stirling, A., The politics of social–ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol. Soc., 15(1), 2010, 11 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11/.
83. Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., et al. Cracking Brazil's forest code. Science 344 (2014), 363–364.
84. Soulé, M.E., The new conservation. Conserv. Biol. 27 (2013), 895–897.
85. Spangenberg, J.H., Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ. Conserv. 38 (2011), 275–287.
86. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Röckstrom, J., et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 2015, 10.1126/science.1259855.
87. Strassburg, B.B.N., Brooks, T., Feltran-Barbieri, R., et al. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1, 2017, AN 0099, 10.1038/s41559-017-0099.
88. Surjan, A., Kudo, S., Utto, J.I., Risk and vulnerability. Uitto, J.I., Shaw, R., (eds.) Sustainable Development and Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, Springer, Japan, 37–55.
89. Torres, R.R., Lapola, D.M., Marengo, J.A., et al. Socio-climatic hotspots in Brazil. Clim. Change 115 (2012), 597–609.
90. Tortato, F.R., Izzo, T.J., Advances and barriers to the development of jaguar-tourism in the Brazilian Pantanal. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15 (2017), 61–63.
91. Urban, M.C., Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348 (2015), 571–573.
92. Vignola, R., Locatelli, B., Martinez, B., et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: what role for policy makers, society and scientists?. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 14 (2009), 691–696.
93. Vignola, R., Harvey, C.A., Bautista-Solis, P., et al. Ecosystem-based adaptation for smallholder farmers: definitions, opportunities and constraints. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 211 (2015), 126–132.
94. Vliet, M.T.H. van, Wiberg, D., Leduc, S., et al. Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources. Nat. Clim. Change 6 (2016), 375–380.
95. Wamsler, C., Pauleit, S., Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries, different pathways, one goal. Clim. Change, 2016, 10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y.
96. Wamsler, C., Niven, L., Beery, T.H., et al. Operationalizing ecosystem-based adaptation: harnessing ecosystem services to buffer communities against climate change. Ecol. Soc., 21(1), 2016, 31.
97. Watts, N., Adger, W.N., Agnolucci, P., et al. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. Lancet 386 (2015), 1861–1914.
98. Yang, W., Dietz, T., Kramer, D.B., et al. An integrated approach to understanding the linkages between ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosyst. Health Sustain., 1(5), 2015, 19.
99. Yang, W., McKinnon, M.C., Turner, W.R., Quantifying human well-being for sustainability research and policy. Ecosyst. Health Sustain., 1(4), 2015, 16.