New perspectives in ecology and conservation

Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-2

  Metzger, Jean Paul ^a   Loyola, Rafael ^b   Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^b   Pillar, Valério D ^c  

^a Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation   (Brazil)

^b Natureza Conservação   (Brazil)

^c President of the Brazilian Association for Ecological Science and Conservation (ABECO)   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020255954     PISSN: 25300644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.02.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Brancalion, P.H.S., Garcia, L.C., Loyola, R., et al. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat. Conserv. 14 (2016), 1–15.
2. Cornelius, C., Awade, M., Cândia-Gallardo, C., et al. Habitat fragmentation drives inter-population variation in dispersal behavior in a neotropical rainforest bird. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15 (2017), 3–9.
3. Dobrovolski, R., Loyola, R.D., De Marco, P. Jr., et al. Agricultural expansion can menace Brazilian protected areas during the 21st century. Nat. Conserv. 9 (2011), 208–213.
4. Fazey, I., Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D.B., Who does all the research in conservation biology?. Biodivers. Conserv. 14 (2005), 917–934.
5. Françoso, R.D., Brandão, R., Nogueira, C.C., et al. Habitat loss and the effectiveness of protected areas in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Nat. Conserv. 13 (2015), 35–40.
6. Habel, J.C., Lens, L., Eggermont, H., et al. More topics from the tropics: additional thoughts to Mammides et al. Biodivers. Conserv. 26 (2017), 237–241.
7. Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., What is conservation science?. BioScience 62 (2012), 962–969.
8. Mammides, C., Goodale, U.M., Corlett, R.T., et al. Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: a stalled process?. Biol. Conserv. 198 (2016), 78–83.
9. Metzger, J.P., O Código Florestal tem base científica?. Nat. Conserv. 8 (2010), 92–99.
10. Milano, M.S., Editorial. Nat. Conserv., 1, 2003, 65.
11. Pedrosa, F., Salerno, R., Padilha, F.V.B., et al. Current distribution of invasive feral pigs in Brazil: economic impacts and ecological uncertainty. Nat. Conserv. 13 (2015), 84–87.
12. Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Species distribution modeling and ecological niche modeling: getting the concepts right. Nat. Conserv. 10 (2012), 102–107.
13. Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Joppa, L.N., et al. How many endangered species remain to be discovered in Brazil?. Nat. Conserv. 8 (2010), 71–77.
14. Rangel, T.F., Loyola, R.D., Labeling ecological Niche models. Nat. Conserv. 10 (2012), 119–126.
15. Scarano, F.R., Martinelli, G., Brazilian list of threatened plant species: reconciling scientific uncertainty and political decision-making. Nat. Conserv. 8 (2010), 13–18.
16. Vasconcelos, T.S., Tracking climatically suitable areas for an endemic Cerrado snake under climate change. Nat. Conserv. 12 (2014), 47–52.