The impact of complications on quality of life following colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study to evaluate the Clavien–Dindo classification system

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 594-602

  Bosma, E ^a   Pullens, M J J ^b   de Vries, J ^b,c   Roukema, J A ^b,c  

^a MARTINI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Microvida Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clavien Dindo classification; colorectal surgery; complications; Quality of Life

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; AGED; CLASSIFICATION; COLON DISEASE; COLON RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM DISEASE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; COLECTOMY; COLONIC DISEASES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTAL DISEASES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85026773581     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/CODI.13244     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH et al. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 251–9.
2. Coello R, Charlett A, Wilson J et al. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2005; 60: 93–103.
3. Zhan C, Miller MR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA 2003; 290: 1868–74.
4. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG et al. Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 326–41.
5. Eagye KJ, Nicolau DP. Deep and organ/space infections in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: incidence and impact on hospital length of stay and costs. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 359–67.
6. Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 803–13.
7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–13.
8. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 187–96.
9. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduo-denectomy. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 931–7.
10. Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB et al. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 927–31.
11. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM et al. Complications of 2775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol 2007; 177: 580–5.
12. Tamura S, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J et al. Systematic grading of surgical complications in live liver donors according to Clavien’s system. Transpl Int 2006; 19: 982–7.
13. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Puhan MA et al. Perception of surgical complications among patients, nurses and physicians: a prospective cross-sectional survey. Patient Saf Surg 2011; 5: 30.
14. Bloemen JG, Visschers RG, Truin W et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1251–8.
15. Pucciarelli S, Del Bianco P, Toppan P et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes in disease-free survivors of mid-low rectal cancer after curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 1846–54.
16. Hornbrook MC, Wendel CS, Coons SJ et al. Complications among colorectal cancer survivors: SF-6D preference-weighted quality of life scores. Med Care 2011; 3: 321–6.
17. Hamming JF, De Vries J. Measuring quality of life. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 923–4.
18. Goslings JC, Gouma DJ. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 2008; 32: 952.
19. Bosma E, Veen EJ, Roukema JA. Incidence, nature and impact of error in surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1654–9.
20. Veen EJ, Steenbruggen J, Roukema JA. Classifying surgical complications: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1078–83.
21. WHOQOL-group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol Med 1998; 28:551–8.
22. de Vries J, Van Heck GL. The Dutch WHOQOL-Bref. Til-burg: Tilburg University, 1996.
23. O’Carroll RE, Couston M, Cossar JA et al. A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 121–4.
24. Shrive FM, Stuart H, Quan H, Ghali WA. Dealing with missing data in a multiple question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 57.
25. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
26. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175–91.
27. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1617–22.
28. Tsunoda A, Nakao K, Hiratsuka K et al. Prospective analysis of quality of life in the first year after colorectal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 77–82.
29. Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG et al. Predictors of early postoperative quality of life after elective resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3435–42.