Sufficiency and relevance of information for inpatients in general ward settings: A qualitative exploration of information exchange between patients and nurses

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 75, Issue , 2017, Pages 112-122

  Crispin, Vivianne ^a,b   Bugge, Carol ^a   Stoddart, Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Information exchange; Multiple case study design; Observational research; Patient nurse interactions; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDWIFE; MODEL; NURSE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; REHABILITATION; SAMPLING; SHARED DECISION MAKING; SPEECH; STUDY DESIGN; SURGERY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; UNITED KINGDOM; ADULT; AGED; DECISION MAKING; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMPONENTS; INFORMATION SERVICE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HOSPITAL UNITS; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INPATIENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85026767255     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arnetz, J., Winblad, U., Arnetz, B., Hoglund, A., Physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of patient involvement in myocardial infarction care. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nur. 7 (2008), 113–120.
2. Barbour, B., Introducing Qualitative Research: A Student Guide to the Craft of Doing Qualitative Research. 2008, SAGE Publications, London.
3. Bugge, C., Entwistle, V., Watt, I., The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations. Soc. Sci. Med. 63 (2006), 2065–2078.
4. Butler, M., Treacy, M., Scott, A., Hyde, A., MacNeela, P., Irving, K., et al. Towards a nursing minimum data set for Ireland: making Irish nursing visible. J. Adv. Nurs. 55 (2006), 364–375.
5. Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc. Sci. Med. 49 (1999), 651–661.
6. Cole, M., McLean, V., Therapeutic relationships re-defined. Occup. Therap. Men. Health 19 (2003), 33–56.
7. Connors, G., Carroll, K., Di Clemente, C., Longabaugh, R., Donovan, D., The therapeutic alliance and its relationship to alcoholism treatment participation and outcome. J. Consultan. Clin. Psych. 65 (1997), 588–598.
8. Costa, M., The lived perioperative experience of ambulatory surgery patients. Assoc. Periopera. Reg. Nurs. 74 (2001), 874–881.
9. Coulter, A., Collins, A., Making Shared Decision-making a Reality: No Decision About Me, Without Me. 2011, The Kings Fund, London.
10. Cresswell, J., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. third ed., 2013, SAGE Publications, London.
11. Crispin, V., (unpublished Results) Information Exchange Between Patients and Nurses During Routine Nursing Care in Ward Settings: A Qualitative Multiple-case Study. [unpublished thesis], 2017.
12. Data Protection Act, Data Protection Act. 1998, The Stationery Office, London.
13. Doherty, C., Doherty, W., Patients’ preferences for involvement in clinical decision-making within secondary care and the factors that influence their preferences. J. Nurs. Man. 13 (2005), 119–127.
14. Duncan, C., Best, C., Hagen, S., Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane DB. Syst. Rev., 1, 2010, CD007297.
15. Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors attitudes and confidence during a ransomized trial. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 10 (2004), 431–437.
16. Entwistle, V., Williams, B., Skea, Z., Maclennan, G., Bhattacharya, S., Which surgical decisions should patients participate in? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about different types of hysterectomy. Soc. Sci. Med. 62 (2006), 499–509.
17. Fielding, F., Fielding, J., Linking Data. 1986, SAGE, Publications, Beverley Hills.
18. Fields, A., Freiberg, C., Fickenscher, A., Shelley, K., Patients and jargon: are we speaking the same language?. J. Clin. Anaesth. 20 (2008), 343–346.
19. Forbat, L., Hubbard, G., Kearney, N., Patient and public involvement: models and muddles. J. Clin. Nurs. 18 (2009), 2547–2554.
20. Ford, S., Schofield, T., Hope, T., Are patients’ decison-making preferences being met?. Health Expect. 6 (2003), 72–80.
21. Francis, R., Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive Summary., 2013, London, The Stationery Office.
22. Friedberg, M., Van Busum, K., Wexler, R., Bowen, M., Schneider, E., A demonstration of shared decision making in primary care highlights barriers to adoption and potential remedies. Health Affair 32 (2013), 268–275.
23. Frongillo, M., Feibelmann, S., Belkora, J., Lee, C., Sepucha, K., Is there shared decision-making when the provider makes a recommendation?. Patient Edu. Couns. 90:2013 (2013), 69–73.
24. Goossen, W., Epping, P., Van Den Heuvel, W., Feuth, T., Frederiks, C., Hasman, A., Development of the Nursing Minimum Data Set for the Netherlands (NMDSN): identification of categories and items. J. Adv. Nurs. 31 (2000), 536–547.
25. Graesser, A., Langston, M., Baggette, W., Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. Nakamura, G., Medin, D., Tarabin, R., (eds.) Categorization by Humans and Machines, 1993, Academic Press, San Diego, 411–436.
26. Holloway, I., Wheeler, S., Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. third ed., 2010, Wiley, Blackwell Oxford.
27. Hughes, C., Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a phenomenological study. J. Adv. Nurs. 66:11 (2010), 2500–2509.
28. Inman, D., Jacobson, T.M., Maxon, P., Huey, W., Lohse, C., Effects of urinary catheter education for patients undergoing prostatectomy. Urol. Nurs. 33:6 (2013), 289–298.
29. Isaacs, C., Kistler, C., Hunold, K., Pereira, G., Buchbinder, M., Weaver, M., et al. Shared decision-making in the selection of outpatient analgesics for older individuals in the emergency department. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 61 (2013), 793–798.
30. Jacobs, V., Informational needs of surgical patients following discharge. Appl. Nurs. Res. 13 (2000), 12–18.
31. Jones, A., Bugge, C., Improving understanding and rigour through triangulation: an exemplar based on patient participatient in interaction. J. Adv. Nurs. 55 (2006), 612–621.
32. Joosten, E., DeFuentes-Merillas, L., De Weert, G., Sensky, T., Van Der Staak, C., De Jong, C., Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother. Psychosom. 77 (2008), 219–226.
33. Lithner, M., Zilling, T., Pre- and postoperative information needs. Patient Educ. Couns. 40 (2000), 29–37.
34. Liu, W., Manias, E., Gerdtz, M., Medication communication during ward rounds on medical wards: power relations and spatial practices. Health (N. Y.) 17 (2013), 113–134.
35. Logan, K., Shaw, C., Webber, I., Samuel, S., Broome, L., Patients’ experiences of learning clean intermittent self-catheterization: a qualitative study. J. Adv. Nurs. 62 (2008), 32–40.
36. Long-term Conditions Alliance Scotland, Gaun Yersel! The Self Management Strategy for Long Term Conditions in Scotland. 2008, Edinburgh, The Scottish Government.
37. May, V., Clarke, T., Coulling, S., Cowie, L., Cox, R., Day, D., Husk, J., Laslett, S., Mansell, S., McHenry, M., What information patients require on graduated compression stockings. Br. J. Nurs. 15 (2006), 263–270.
38. Miles, M., Huberman, A., Saldana, J., Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. third ed., 2013, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
39. Msiska, G., Smith, P., Fawcett, T., Nyasulu, B.M., Emotional labour and compassionate care: what's the relationship?. Nurs. Ed. Today 34:9 (2014), 1246–1252.
40. Nelson, B., Kinjo, K., Meier, D., Ahmad, K., Morrison, R., When critical illness becomes chronic: informational needs of patients and families. J. Crit. Care 20 (2005), 79–89.
41. Ram, A., A theory of questions and question asking. J. Learn. Sci. 4 (1991), 273–318.
42. Redsell, S., Stokes, T., Jackson, C., Hastings, A., Baker, R., Patients’ accounts of the differences in nurses’ and general practitioners’ roles in primary care. J. Adv. Nurs. 57:2 (2007), 172–180.
43. Selman, L., Higginson, I., Agupio, G., Dinat, N., Downing, J., Gwyther, L., et al. Meeting information needs of patients with incurable progressive disease and their families in South Africa and Uganda: multicentre qualitative study. Br. Med. J. 338 (2009), 1326–1336.
44. Shay, L., Lafata, J., Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Edu. Couns. 96 (2014), 295–301.
45. Shih, F., Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. J. Adv. Nurs. 28 (1998), 631–641.
46. Shortus, T., Kemp, L., McKenzie, S., Harris, M., Managing patient involvement: provider perspectives on diabetes decision-making. Health Expect. 16 (2013), 189–198.
47. Simon, M., Ragas, D., Nonzee, N., Phisuthikul, A., Luu, T., Dong, X., Percpetions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care: a qualitative study of low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women. J. Comm. Health 38 (2013), 707–715.
48. Suhonen, R., Leino-Kilpi, H.H., Adult surgical patients and the information provided to them by nurses: a literature review. Patient Educ. Couns. 61 (2006), 5–15.
49. Suhonen, R., Nenonen, H., Laukka, A., Valimaki, M., Patients’ informational needs and information received do not correspond in hospital. J. of Clin. Nurs. 14 (2005), 1167–1176.
50. Taylor, S., Hospital patient behaviour: reactance, helplessness, or control?. J. Soc Issues 35 (1979), 156–184.
51. The Scottish Government, Better Health; Better Care: Action Plan. 2007, The Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
52. The Scottish Government, The Healthcare Quality Strategy for NHSScotland. 2010, The Scottish Governement, Edinburgh.
53. Thompson, A., The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Soc. Sci. Med. 64 (2007), 1297–1310.
54. Van Den Brink-Muinen, A., Van Dulmen, S., De Haes, H., Visser, A., Schellevis, F., Bensing, J., Has patients’ involvement in the decision-making process changed over time?. Health Expect. 9 (2006), 333–342.
55. Waterworth, S., Luker, K., Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning their care?. JAN 15 (1990), 971–976.
56. Werley, H., Devine, E., Zorn, C., Ryan, P., Westra, B., The Nursing Minimum Data Set: abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data. Am. J. Public Health 81 (1991), 421–426.
57. Yin, R., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2014, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.