Improving understanding and rigour through triangulation: An exemplar based on patient participation in interaction

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 612-621

  Jones, Aled ^a   Bugge, Carol ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; King's conceptual system; Nurse patient interaction; Patient participation; Research methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONNEL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 33747129637     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03953.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ackerman M., Brink S., Jones C., Moody S., Perlich G. & Prusinski B. (1986) Imogene King. Theory of goal attainment. In Nursing Theorists and their Work (Amrriner A., ed.), CV Mosby, St Louis, MO, pp. 231-245.
2. Allen D. (2000) 'I'll tell you what suits me best if you don't mind me saying': 'lay participation' in health care. Nursing Inquiry 7, 182-190.
3. Arksey H. & Knight P. (1999) Interviewing for Social Scientists. Sage, London.
4. Barbour R. (1998) Mixing qualitative methods: quality assurance or qualitative quagmire? Qualitative Health Research 8, 352-361.
5. Barbour R. (1999) The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 4, 39-43.
6. Billig M. (1999) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10(4), 543-582.
7. Britten N., Stevenson F., Barry C.A., Barber N. & Bradley C. (2000) Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 320, 484-488.
8. Caris-Verhallen W., Kerktra A. & Bensing J. (1997) The role of communication in nursing care for elderly people: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25, 915-933.
9. Charles C., Gafni A. & Whelan T. (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681-692.
10. Charles C., Gafni A. & Whelan T. (1999) Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 49, 651-661.
11. Coleman T. & Murphy E. (1999) Combining qualitative interviews with video-recorded consultations: gaining insight into GPs decision-making. Family Practice 16, 173-178.
12. Coulter A. (2002) The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care. The Stationary Office, London.
13. Davidson J. (1984) Subsequent version of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Studies in Conversation Analysis (Atkinson J.M. & Heritage J., eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 102-128.
14. Denzin N.K. (1970) The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Butterworths, London.
15. Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan. A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. Department of Health, London.
16. Department of Health (2004) 'Getting Over the Wall'. How the NHS is Improving the Patient's Experience. Department of Health, London.
17. Edwards A. & Elwyn G. (2001) Evidence-based Patient Choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Ellis R., Gates B. & Kenworthy N. (2003) Interpersonal Communication in Nursing, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
19. Emanuel E.J. & Emanuel L.L. (1992) Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 267, 2221-2226.
20. Entwistle V., Watt I., Gilhooly K., Bugge C., Haites N. & Walker A. (2004) Assessing patients' participation and quality of decisionmaking: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counseling 55, 105-113.
21. Fawcett J. (1989) Analysis and Evaluation of Conceptual Models of Nursing, 2nd edn. FA Davis, Philadelphia, PA.
22. Fawcett J. (2001) The nurse theorists: 21st century updates - Imogene M King. Nursing Science Quarterly 14(4), 311-315.
23. Foss C. & Ellefsen B. (2002) The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of a method triangulation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40, 242-248.
24. Geest T.A., Wetzels R., Raposo V., Lopes Ferreira P., Baker R., Wensing M. & Olesen F. (2005) Elderly patients' and GPs' views on different methods for patient involvement: an international qualitative interview study. Family Practice 22, 184-191.
25. Gilhooly K. & Green C. (1996) Protocol analysis: theoretical background. In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences (Richardson J.T.E., ed.), The British Psychological Society, Leicester, pp. 43-54.
26. Green C. & Gilhooly K. (1996) Protocol analysis: practical implementation. In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences (Richardson J.T.E., ed.), The British Psychological Society, Leicester, pp. 55-74.
27. Guadagnoli E. & Ward P. (1998) Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science & Medicine 47, 329-339.
28. Guba E.G. & Lincoln Y.S. (1994) Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
29. Institute of Medicine (2000) Committee on the National Quality Report on Health Care Delivery, Board on Health Care Services. Envisioning the National Health Care Quality Report (Hurtado M., Swift E. & Corrigan J., eds), Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
30. Institute of Medicine (2001) Committee on Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
31. Jarrett N. & Payne S. (1995) A selective review of the literature on nurse-patient communication: has the patient's contribution been neglected? Journal of Advanced Nursing 22, 72-78.
32. Jefferson G. (1985) An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3 (Van Dijk T., ed.), Academia Press, London, pp. 25-34.
33. Johns C. (2004) Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
34. King I.M. (1971) Toward a Theory of Nursing: General Concepts of Human Behaviour. Wiley, New York.
35. King I.M. (1981) A Theory for Nursing: Systems, Concepts, Process. Wiley, New York.
36. King I.M. (1999) A theory for goal attainment: philosophical and ethical implications. Nursing Science Quarterly 12, 292-296.
37. Mason J. (2002) Qualitative Researching. Sage Publications, London.
38. Mays N. & Pope C. (2000) Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 320, 50-52.
39. Miller J. & Glassner B. (2004) The 'inside' and the 'outside'. Finding realities in interviews. In Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice, 2nd edn (Silverman D., ed.), Sage, London, pp. 125-139.
40. Ndekha A., Hansen E., Molgaard P., Woelk G. & Furu P. (2003) Community participation as an interactive learning process: experiences from a schistosomiasis control project in Zimbabwe. Acta Tropica 85, 325-338.
41. NHS Modernisation Agency (2003) Essence of Care. Guidance and New Communication Benchmarks. Department of Health, London.
42. Parahoo K. (1997) Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Palgrave, Basingstoke.
43. Pomerantz A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Studies in Conversation Analysis (Atkinson J.M. & Heritage J., eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57-101.
44. Pomerantz A., Fehr B.J. & Ende J. (1997) When supervising physicians see patients: strategies used in difficult situations. Human Communication Research 23, 589-615.
45. Psathas G. (1995) Conversation Analysis. The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
46. Razum O. & Gerhardus A. (1999) Methodological triangulation in public health research - advancement or mirage? Tropical Medicine and International Health 4, 243-244.
47. Rose K.E. & Webb C. (1997) Triangulation of data collection: practicalities and problems in a study of informal carers of terminally ill cancer patients. NT Research 2, 108-116.
48. Ruusuvuori J. (2001) Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine 52, 1093-1198.
49. Sacks H., Schegloff E. & Jefferson G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking during conversations. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (Schenken J., ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 696-735.
50. Sainio C., Lauri S. & Eriksson E. (2001) Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making. Nursing Ethics 8(2), 97-113.
51. Schegloff E. (1992) On talk and its institutional occasions. In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings (Drew P. & Heritage J., eds), Sage, London, pp. 101-136.
52. Shih F.J. (1998) Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28, 631-641.
53. Sim J. & Sharp K. (1998) A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies 35, 23-31.
54. Sully P. & Dallas J. (2005) Essential Communication Skills for Nursing. Elsevier Mosby, Edinburgh.
55. Tutton E. (2005) Patient participation on a ward for frail older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50(2), 143-152.
56. World Health Organization (2000) World Health Report 2000 - Health Systems: Improving Performance. WHO, Geneva.