The gene drive bubble: New realities

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2017, Pages

  Bull, James J ^a   Malik, Harmit S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DISEASE CONTROL; GENE DRIVE SYSTEM; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; GENE DRIVE TECHNOLOGY; GENE TRANSFER; HUMAN;

LIPOSOME;

GENE DRIVE TECHNOLOGY; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LIPOSOMES;

EID: 85026648593     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006850     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Sandler L, Novitski E, Meotic Drive as an Evolutionary Force. The American Naturalist. 1957;91(857):105–10.
2. Hickey WA, Craig GB, Distortion of Sex Ratio in Populations of Aedes Aegypti. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology. Journal Canadien De Génétique Et De Cytologie. 1966;8(2):260–78. 5960416
3. Chesley P, Dunn LC, The Inheritance of Taillessness (Anury) in the House Mouse. Genetics. 1936;21(5):525–36. 17246810
4. Dunn LC, Variations in the Segregation Ratio as Causes of Variations in Gene Frequency. Acta Genetica Et Statistica Medica. 1953;4(2–3):139–47. 13137882
5. Sandler L, Hiraizumi Y, Sandler I, Meiotic Drive in Natural Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. The Cytogenetic Basis of Segregation-Distortion. Genetics. 1959;44(2):233–50. 17247821
6. Prout T, Some Effects of Variations in the Segregation Ratio and of Selection on the Frequency of Alleles under Random Mating. Acta Genetica Et Statistica Medica. 1953;4(2–3):148–51. 13137883
7. Bruck D, Male Segregation Ratio Advantage as a Factor in Maintaining Lethal Alleles in Wild Populations of House Mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1957;43(1):152–58. 16589989
8. Lewontin RC, A General Method for Investigating the Equilibrium of Gene Frequency in a Population. Genetics. 1958;43(3):419–34. 17247767
9. Burt A, Site-Specific Selfish Genes as Tools for the Control and Genetic Engineering of Natural Populations. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society. 2003;270(1518):921–28. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2319 12803906
10. Galizi R, Doyle LA, Menichelli M, Bernardini F, Deredec A, Burt A, et al. A Synthetic Sex Ratio Distortion System for the Control of the Human Malaria Mosquito. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3977. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4977 24915045
11. Windbichler N, Menichelli M, Papathanos PA, Thyme SB, Li H, Ulge UY, et al. A Synthetic Homing Endonuclease-Based Gene Drive System in the Human Malaria Mosquito. Nature. 2011;473(7346):212–15. doi: 10.1038/nature09937 21508956
12. Gantz VM, Bier E, Genome Editing. The Mutagenic Chain Reaction: A Method for Converting Heterozygous to Homozygous Mutations. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2015;348(6233):442–44. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5945 25908821
13. Deredec A, Burt A, Godfray HCJ, The Population Genetics of Using Homing Endonuclease Genes in Vector and Pest Management. Genetics. 2008;179(4):2013–26. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.089037 18660532
14. Unckless RL, Messer PW, Connallon T, Clark AG, Modeling the Manipulation of Natural Populations by the Mutagenic Chain Reaction. Genetics. 2015;201(2):425–31. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.177592 26232409
15. Unckless RL, Clark AG, Messer PW, Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive. Genetics. 2017;205(2):827–41. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.197285 27941126
16. Leigh EG, JrAdaptation and Diversity: Natural History and the Mathematics of Evolution. 1st Edition. edition. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper; 1971.
17. Lyttle TW, Experimental Population Genetics of Meiotic Drive Systems. I. Pseudo-Y Chromosomal Drive as a Means of Eliminating Cage Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1977;86(2 Pt. 1):413–45.
18. Lyttle TW, Experimental Population Genetics of Meiotic Drive Systems II. Accumulation of Genetic Modifiers of Segregation Distorter (SD) in Laboratory Populations. Genetics. 1979;91(2):339–57. 17248888
19. Lyttle TW, Experimental Population Genetics of Meiotic Drive Systems. III. Neutralization of Sex-Ratio Distortion in Drosophila through Sex-Chromosome Aneuploidy. Genetics. 1981;98(2):317–34. 6799357
20. Champer JR, Reeves R, Oh SY, Liu C, Liu J, Clark AG, et al. Novel CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive Constructs Reveal Insights into Mechanisms of Resistance Allele Formation and Drive Efficiency in Genetically Diverse Populations. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(7):e1006796.
21. Drury DW, Dapper AL, Siniard DJ, Zentner GE, Wade MJ, CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drives in Genetically Variable and Nonrandomly Mating Wild Populations. Science Advances. 2017;3:e1601910. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601910 28560324
22. Bull JJ, Lethal Gene Drive Selects Inbreeding. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. 2017;(1):1–16. doi: 10.1093/emph/eow030 28013241