Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 687-695

  Munce, Sarah E P ^a   Allin, Sonya ^b   Wolfe, Dalton L ^c   Anzai, Karen ^d   Linassi, Gary ^e   Noonan, Vanessa K ^f   Jaglal, Susan B ^a,b  

^a TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Lawson Health Research Institute ^*  (Canada)

^d GF STRONG REHABILITATION CENTRE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^f RICK HANSEN INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Qualitative descriptive; Self management; Spinal cord injury; Theoretical domains framework

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAINSTORMING; CANADA; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; EDUCATION; NEUROREHABILITATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CANADA; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; FOCUS GROUPS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; SELF-MANAGEMENT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION;

EID: 85026506317     PISSN: 10790268     EISSN: 20457723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1356437     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Rowe BH, May LA, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW., Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord 2004;42(9):513–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101629
2. Jaglal SB, Munce SEP, Guilcher SJT, Couris CM, Fung K, Craven BC, et al. Health system factors associated with rehosptialisations after traumatic spinal cord injury: a population-based study. Spinal Cord 2009;47(8):604–09. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.9
3. Munce SEP, Guilcher SJT, Couris CM, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, et al. Physician utilization among adults with traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario: a population-based study. Spinal Cord 2009;47(6):470–6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.173
4. Guilcher SJ, Casciaro T, Lemieux-Charles L, Craven C, McColl MA, Jaglal SB., Social networks and secondary health conditions: the critical secondary team for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35(5):330–42. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000035
5. McColl MA, Aiken A, McColl A, Smith K., Primary care for people with SCI. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connelly SJ, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence. Vancouver; 2010. p. 1–24.
6. DeJong G, Hoffman J, Meade M, Bombardier C, Deutsch A, Nemunaitis G, et al. Postrehabilitative health care for individuals with SCI: extending health care into the community. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2011;17(2):46–58. doi: 10.1310/sci1702-46
7. Kroll T, Neri MT, Ho P-S., Secondary conditions in spinal cord injury: results from a perspective survey. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29(15):1229–37. doi: 10.1080/09638280600950603
8. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J., Self-management approachs for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48(2):177–87. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0
9. Barlow JH, Williams RB, Wright CC., Instilling the strength to fight the pain and get on with life: learning to become an arthritis self-manager. Health Educ Res 1999;14(4):101–14. doi: 10.1093/her/14.4.533
10. Lorig K, Gonález VM, Laurent DD, Morgan L, Laris BA., Arthritis self-management program variations: three studies. Arthritis Care Res 1998;11(6):448–54. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110604
11. Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC., A randomised controlled study of the arthritis self-management programme in the UK. Health Educ Res 2000;15(6):665–80. doi: 10.1093/her/15.6.665
12. Hirsche RC, Williams B, Jones A, Manns P., Chronic disease self-management for individuals with stroke, multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33(13–14): 1136–46. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.523103
13. Munce SEP, Webster F, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Jang E, Jaglal SB., Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Neurology 2014;14:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-48
14. Munce SE, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Nugaeva N, Jang E, Webster F, et al. Views of people with traumatic spinal cord injury about the components of self-management programs and program delivery: a Canadian pilot study. BMC Neurology 2014;14:209. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0209-9
15. Munce SE, Straus SE, Fehlings MG, Voth J, Nugaeva N, Jang E, et al. Impact of psychological characteristics in self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2016;54(1):29–33. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.91
16. Munce SE, Webster F, Fehlings MG, Straus SE, Jang E, Jaglal SB., Meaning of self-management from the perspective of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury, their caregivers, and acute and rehabilitation managers: an opportunity for improved care delivery. BMC Neurology 2016;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0534-2
17. French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenize JE, Francis JE, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci 2012;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-38
18. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S., Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012;7:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
19. Sandelowski M., Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23(4):334–40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
20. Sandelowski M., What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010;33(1):77–84.
21. Williams TL, Smith B, Papathomas A., Physical activity promotion for people with spinal cord injury: physiotherapists’ beliefs and actions. Disabil Rehabil 2016 Dec 5:1–10. [Epub ahead of print]
22. Cherryholmes C., Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educ Res 1992;21(6):13–7. doi: 10.3102/0013189X021006013
23. Nowell L., Pragmatism and integrated knowledge translation: exploring the compatibilities and tensions. Nurs Op 2015;2(3):141–48. doi: 10.1002/nop2.30
24. Ide-Okochi A, Tadaka E, Fujimura K., The meaning of self-care in persons with cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. BMC Neurol 2013;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-115
25. Holloway I, Wheeler S., Qualitative research for nurses. 1996, Malden: Blackwell Science Ltd.
26. Guba E, Lincoln Y., Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responses and naturalistic approaches. 1985, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
27. Braun V, Clarke V., Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
28. Houlihan BV, Brody M, Everhart-Skeels S, Pernigotti D, Burnett S, Zazula J, et al. Randomized trial of a peer-led, telephone-based empowerment intervention for persons with chronic spinal cord injury improves health self-management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98(6):1067–76. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.005
29. McKenzie JE, French SD, O’Connor DA, Grimshaw J, Mortimer D, Michie S, et al. Implementing a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based management in general practice (IMPLEMENT): cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol. Implement Sci 2008;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-11
30. McKenzie JE, O’Connor DA, Page MJ, Mortimer D, French SD, Walker BF, et al. Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol. Implement Sci 2010;5:86. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-86
31. Dyson J, Lawton R, Jackson C, Cheater F., Does the use of a theoretical approach tell us more about hand hygiene behaviour? The barriers and levers to hand hygiene. J Infection Prev 2010;12(1):17. doi: 10.1177/1757177410384300
32. Boscart VM, Fernie GR, Lee JH, Jaglal SB., Using psychological theory to inform methods to optimize the implementation of a hand hygiene intervention. Implement Sci 2012;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-77
33. Francis J, Stockton C, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Cuthbertson BH, Grimshaw JM, et al. Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: Using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Heal Psychol 2009;14(Pt 4):625–46. doi: 10.1348/135910708X397025
34. Francis J, Tinmouth A, Stanworth SJ., Using theories of behaviour change to understand transfusion prescribing three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for and implementation trial. Implement Sci 2009;4:70. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-70
35. Michie S, Pilling S, Garety P, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al. Difficulties implementing a mental health guideline: an exploratory investigation using psychological theory. Implement Sci 2007;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-8
36. Amemori M, Korhonen T, Kinnunen T, Michie S, Murtomaa H., Enhancing implementation of tobacco use prevention and cessation counselling guideline among dental providers: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2011;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-13
37. Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, Jankelowitz SK, Lin IB, Loy CT, et al. Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across clinical environments. J Multidisc Healthcare 2015;8:139–46.