Finding patients using similarity measures in a rare diseases-oriented clinical data warehouse: Dr. Warehouse and the needle in the needle stack

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 73, Issue , 2017, Pages 51-61

  Garcelon, Nicolas ^a,b   Neuraz, Antoine ^b,c   Benoit, Vincent ^a   Salomon, Rémi ^a,c   Kracker, Sven ^a,b   Suarez, Felipe ^a,c   Bahi Buisson, Nadia ^a,c   Hadj Rabia, Smail ^a,c   Fischer, Alain ^a,c,d   Munnich, Arnold ^a,b,c   Burgun, Anita ^b,c,e  

^a IMAGINE INSTITUTE   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

^d Paris Sciences et Lettres   (France)

^e HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

Author keywords

Data warehouse; Electronic health records; Rare diseases; Similarity measures; Vector space model

Indexed keywords

DATA WAREHOUSES; DISEASES; NEEDLES; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; VECTOR SPACES;

ACADEMIC HOSPITALS; CLINICAL DATA WAREHOUSE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; RARE DISEASE; SIMILARITY DISTANCE; SIMILARITY MEASURE; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS; VECTOR SPACE MODELS;

DIAGNOSIS;

ANEMIA; ARTICLE; ASTHENIA; CATARACT; DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA DYSTROPHICA; FEVER; FRANCE; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SCREENING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KIDNEY FAILURE; LOWE SYNDROME; LUPUS VULGARIS; MEDICAL HISTORY; NARRATIVE; NEEDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEINURIA; RARE DISEASE; RECALL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETT SYNDROME; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; THROMBOCYTOPENIA; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM; UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; DATA WAREHOUSE; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA SIMPLEX; HUMAN;

PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE;

DATA WAREHOUSING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA SIMPLEX; FRANCE; HUMANS; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASES; RARE DISEASES;

EID: 85026446496     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. The Shire Rare Disease Impact Report (2013 – US and UK Population). (accessed 26 Sep 2016).
2. Questions: Euan Ashley on Diagnosing the Undiagnosable. < http://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2015/09/5-questions-euan-ashley-on-diagnosing-the-undiagnosable.html> (accessed 26 Sep 2016).
3. Danciu, I., Cowan, J.D., Basford, M., et al. Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach. J. Biomed. Inform. 52 (2014), 28–35, 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.003.
4. Murphy, S.N., Weber, G., Mendis, M., et al. Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2). J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 17 (2010), 124–130, 10.1136/jamia.2009.000893.
5. Lowe, H.J., Ferris, T.A., Hernandez, P.M., et al. STRIDE–an integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. AMIA Symp. AMIA Symp. 2009 (2009), 391–395.
6. Sun, J., Wang, F., Hu, J., et al. Supervised patient similarity measure of heterogeneous patient records. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 14 (2012), 16–24, 10.1145/2408736.2408740.
7. Salton, G., Lesk, M., Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing. J. ACM 15 (1968), 8–36.
8. Salton, G., The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. 1971, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
9. Salton, G., Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval. 1968, McGraw Hill Text.
10. Jones, K.S., A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J. Doc. 28 (1972), 11–21.
11. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H., Introduction to Information Retrieval. 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
12. Zobel, J., Moffat, A., Wilkinson, R., et al. Efficient retrieval of partial documents. Inf. Process. Manag. 31 (1995), 361–377, 10.1016/0306-4573(94)00052-5.
13. Lee, D.L., Chuang, H., Seamons, K., Document ranking and the vector-space model. IEEE Softw. 14 (1997), 67–75, 10.1109/52.582976.
14. Shaw, W.M., Burgin, R., Howell, P., Performance standards and evaluations in IR test collections: vector-space and other retrieval models. Inf. Process. Manag. 33 (1997), 15–36, 10.1016/S0306-4573(96)00044-1.
15. Crouch, C.J., Mahajan, A., Bellamkonda, A., Flexible retrieval based on the vector space model. Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., (eds.) Advances in Xml Information Retrieval, 2005, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 292–302.
16. Zobel, J., Moffat, A., Inverted files for text search engines. ACM Comput. Surv., 38, 2006, 10.1145/1132956.1132959.
17. Kwak, M., Leroy, G., Martinez, J.D., et al. Development and evaluation of a biomedical search engine using a predicate-based vector space model. J. Biomed. Inform. 46 (2013), 929–939, 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.07.006.
18. Golub, K., Automated subject classification of textual web documents. J. Doc. 62 (2006), 350–371, 10.1108/00220410610666501.
19. Xie, L., Li, G., Xiao, M., et al. Novel classification method for remote sensing images based on information entropy discretization algorithm and vector space model. Comput. Geosci. 89 (2016), 252–259, 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.12.015.
20. Jing, L., Ng, M.K., Huang, J.Z., Knowledge-based vector space model for text clustering. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 25 (2010), 35–55, 10.1007/s10115-009-0256-5.
21. Lee, P.-C., Su, H.-N., Chan, T.-Y., Assessment of ontology-based knowledge network formation by Vector-Space Model. Scientometrics 85 (2010), 689–703, 10.1007/s11192-010-0267-8.
22. Santos, I., Laorden, C., Sanz, B., et al. Enhanced topic-based vector space model for semantics-aware spam filtering. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), 437–444, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.034.
23. Castells, P., Fernandez, M., Vallet, D., An adaptation of the vector-space model for ontology-based information retrieval. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 19 (2007), 261–272, 10.1109/TKDE.2007.22.
24. Sarkar, I.N., A vector space model approach to identify genetically related diseases. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 19 (2012), 249–254, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000480.
25. Lee, J., Maslove, D.M., Dubin, J.A., Personalized mortality prediction driven by electronic medical data and a patient similarity metric. PloS One, 10, 2015, e0127428, 10.1371/journal.pone.0127428.
26. Campillo-Gimenez, B., Garcelon, N., Jarno, P., et al. Full-text automated detection of surgical site infections secondary to neurosurgery in Rennes, France. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 192 (2013), 572–575.
27. Rosenbloom, S.T., Denny, J.C., Xu, H., et al. Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA 18 (2011), 181–186, 10.1136/jamia.2010.007237.
28. Raghavan, P., Chen, J.L., Fosler-Lussier, E., et al. How essential are unstructured clinical narratives and information fusion to clinical trial recruitment?. AMIA Jt. Summits Transl. Sci. Proc. AMIA Summit. Transl. Sci 2014 (2014), 218–223.
29. N. Garcelon, A. Neuraz, V. Benoit, et al., Improving a full-text search engine: the importance of negation detection and family history context to identify cases in a biomedical data warehouse, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw144. Published Online First: 20 October 2016.
30. Chapman, W.W., Bridewell, W., Hanbury, P., et al. Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2001 (2001), 105–109.
31. Chu, D., Dowling, J.N., Chapman, W.W., Evaluating the effectiveness of four contextual features in classifying annotated clinical conditions in emergency department reports. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. AMIA Symp., 2006, 141–145.
32. Guttmacher, A.E., Collins, F.S., Carmona, R.H., The family history–more important than ever. N. Engl. J. Med. 351 (2004), 2333–2336, 10.1056/NEJMsb042979.
33. Orphanet. < http://www.orpha.net/consor/www/cgi-bin/index.php?lng=FR> (accessed 22 Feb 2017).
34. Loi, M., Lowe syndrome. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis., 1, 2006, 16, 10.1186/1750-1172-1-16.
35. Hovnanian, A., Hilal, L., Blanchet-Bardon, C., et al. Recurrent nonsense mutations within the type VII collagen gene in patients with severe recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55 (1994), 289–296.
36. Schuilenga-Hut, P.H.L., Vlies, P.v.d., Jonkman, M.F., et al. Mutation analysis of the entire keratin 5 and 14 genes in patients with epidermolysis bullosa simplex and identification of novel mutations. Hum. Mutat., 21, 2003, 447, 10.1002/humu.9124.
37. Amir, R.E., Van den Veyver, I.B., Wan, M., et al. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet. 23 (1999), 185–188, 10.1038/13810.
38. Angulo, I., Vadas, O., Garçon, F., et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ gene mutation predisposes to respiratory infection and airway damage. Science 342 (2013), 866–871, 10.1126/science.1243292.
39. Deau, M.-C., Heurtier, L., Frange, P., et al. A human immunodeficiency caused by mutations in the PIK3R1 gene. J. Clin. Invest. 124 (2014), 3923–3928, 10.1172/JCI75746.
40. G. Salton, M.J. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1986. (accessed 17 Sep 2015).
41. T.I. Coulter, A. Chandra, C.M. Bacon, et al., Clinical spectrum and features of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ syndrome: a large patient cohort study, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.021. Published Online First: 16 July 2016.
42. T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, et al., Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. ArXiv13013781 Cs. < http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781> (accessed 24 Sep 2016). Published Online First: 16 January 2013.
43. Castrodale, V., The hypotonic infant: case study of central core disease. Neonatal Netw. NN 22 (2003), 53–59, 10.1891/0730-0832.22.1.53.
44. Jackson, S., Nesbitt, L.T., Differential Diagnosis for the Dermatologist. 2012, Springer Science & Business Media.
45. Taruscio, D., Groft, S.C., Cederroth, H., et al. Undiagnosed Diseases Network International (UDNI): white paper for global actions to meet patient needs. Mol. Genet. Metab. 116 (2015), 223–225, 10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.11.003.
46. Frankovich, J., Longhurst, C.A., Sutherland, S.M., Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era. N. Engl. J. Med. 365 (2011), 1758–1759, 10.1056/NEJMp1108726.