Measuring national energy performance via Energy Trilemma Index: A Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis

Energy Economics

Volumn 66, Issue , 2017, Pages 313-319

  Song, Lianlian ^a   Fu, Yelin ^b   Zhou, Peng ^a   Lai, Kin Keung ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Energy performance; Rank; Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis

Indexed keywords

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

CORRESPONDING WEIGHTS; DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM; ELICITATION METHODS; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; EVALUATION RESULTS; RANK; STOCHASTIC MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

ENERGY USE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RANKING; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 85026380538     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240:1 (2015), 172–182.
2. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., Robust ordinal regression and stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model. Omega 63 (2016), 154–169.
3. Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E., Decision quality using ranked attribute weights. Manag. Sci. 42:11 (1996), 1515–1523.
4. Cook, W.D., Golany, B., Kress, M., Penn, M., Raviv, T., Optimal allocation of proposals to reviewers to facilitate effective ranking. Manag. Sci. 51:4 (2005), 655–661.
5. Corrente, S., Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., The SMAA-PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239:2 (2014), 514–522.
6. Durbach, I.N., A simulation-based test of stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using achievement functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170:3 (2006), 923–934.
7. Durbach, I.N., Calder, J.M., Modelling uncertainty in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Omega 64 (2016), 13–23.
8. Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., Salminen, P., SMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 106:1 (1998), 137–143.
9. Lahdelma, R., Makkonen, S., Salminen, P., Multivariate Gaussian criteria in SMAA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170:3 (2006), 957–970.
10. Lahdelma, R., Makkonen, S., Salminen, P., Two ways to handle dependent uncertainties in multi-criteria decision problems. Omega 37:1 (2009), 79–92.
11. Lahdelma, R., Miettinen, K., Salminen, P., Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147:1 (2003), 117–127.
12. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Oper. Res. 49:3 (2001), 444–454.
13. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., Classifying efficient alternatives in SMAA using cross confidence factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170:1 (2006), 228–240.
14. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 170:1 (2006), 241–252.
15. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Omega 37:5 (2009), 961–971.
16. Luzzati, T., Gucciardi, G., A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries. Ecol. Econ. 113 (2015), 25–38.
17. Melkonyan, T., Safra, Z., Intrinsic variability in group and individual decision-making. Manag. Sci. 62:9 (2016), 2651–2667.
18. Nielsen, L., Jeppesen, T., Tradable green certificates in selected european countries overview and assessment. Energy Policy 31:1 (2003), 3–14.
19. 2 emission permits economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries. Energy Policy 34:14 (2006), 1889–1899.
20. Singh, R.K., Murty, H., Gupta, S., Dikshit, A., An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 9:2 (2009), 189–212.
21. Singh, R.K., Murty, H., Gupta, S., Dikshit, A., An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 15:1 (2012), 281–299.
22. Tanaka, K., Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy. Energy Policy 36:8 (2008), 2887–2902.
23. Tervonen, T., JSMAA: open source software for SMAA computations. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 45:1 (2014), 69–81.
24. Tervonen, T., Lahdelma, R., Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:2 (2007), 500–513.
25. Wang, H., Xu, P., Lu, X., Yuan, D., Methodology of comprehensive building energy performance diagnosis for large commercial buildings at multiple levels. Appl. Energy 169 (2016), 14–27.
26. Wang, Y.-M., Luo, Y., Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 51:1 (2010), 1–12.
27. Yang, F., Ang, S., Xia, Q., Yang, C., Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223:2 (2012), 483–488.
28. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy 36:8 (2008), 2911–2916.
29. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.-L., Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecol. Econ. 60:1 (2006), 111–118.
30. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.-L., Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics 30:1 (2008), 1–14.
31. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.-L., A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189:1 (2008), 1–18.
32. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Zhou, D., Measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance: a parametric frontier approach. Appl. Energy 90:1 (2012), 196–200.
33. Zhou, P., Poh, K.L., Ang, B.W., A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:1 (2007), 1–9.