Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 63, Issue , 2016, Pages 154-169

  Angilella, Silvia ^a   Corrente, Salvatore ^a   Greco, Salvatore ^a,b   Słowiński, Roman ^c,d  

^a University of Catania and CESifo Research Network   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^c POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Choquet integral preference model; Hierarchy of criteria; Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding; Robust Ordinal Regression; Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis; University ranking

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; CHOQUET INTEGRAL; CHOQUET INTEGRAL PREFERENCE MODEL; HIERARCHY OF CRITERIA; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION AIDING; PREFERENCE MODELS; ROBUST ORDINAL REGRESSIONS; STOCHASTIC MULTIOBJECTIVE ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSE; STOCHASTICS; UNIVERSITY RANKING;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

STOCHASTIC MODEL; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 84988808487     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. [1] 〈 http://www.umultirank.org〉.
2. [2] Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., Lami, I., Non additive robust ordinal regression for urban and territorial planning: an application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operational Research, 2015, 10.1007/s10479-015-1787-7.
3. [3] Angilella S, Corrente S, Greco S. SMAA-Choquet: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral. In: Greco S, et al., editors, Advances in computational intelligence, Communications in computer and information science, vol. 300. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Catania, Italy; 2012. p. 248–57.
4. [4] Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research 240:1 (2015), 172–182.
5. [5] Angilella S, Corrente S, Greco S, Słowiński R. Multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral. In: Purshouse RC, et al., editors, EMO 2013, Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS), vol. 7811. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Sheffield, UK; 2013. p. 475–89.
6. [6] Angilella, S., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Non-additive robust ordinal regression: a multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research 201:1 (2010), 277–288.
7. [7] Boutilier C, Bacchus F, Brafman R. UCP-networks: a directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In: Proceedings of the 17th conference in uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI); 2001. p. 56–64.
8. [8] Brans, J.P., Vincke., Ph., A preference ranking organisation method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science 31:6 (1985), 647–656.
9. [9] Choquet, G., Theory of capacities. Annales de l׳Institut Fourier 5:54 (1953), 131–295.
10. [10] Corrente, S., Figueira, J., Greco, S., Dealing with interaction between bipolar multiple criteria preferences in PROMETHEE methods. Annals of Operations Research 217:1 (2014), 137–164.
11. [11] Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., Słowiński, R., Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Machine Learning 93 (2013), 381–422.
12. [12] Corrente S, Greco S, Kadziński M, Słowiński R. Robust ordinal regression. In: Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science; 2014. p. 1-10.
13. [13] Corrente, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., Multiple criteria hierarchy process in robust ordinal regression. Decision Support Systems 53:3 (2012), 660–674.
14. [14] Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Parallel problem solving from nature, PPSN VI. Springer, Paris, France; 2000. p. 849–58.
15. [15] Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., (eds.) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 2005, Springer, Berlin.
16. [16] Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Roy, B., ELECTRE methods with interaction between criteria: an extension of the concordance index. European Journal of Operational Research 199:2 (2009), 478–495.
17. [17] Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Słowiński, R., Roy, B., An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 20 (2013), 61–85.
18. [18] Fishburn, P.C., Utility theory for decision making. 1970, Wiley, New York.
19. [19] Fujimoto K. On hierarchical decomposition of Choquet integral model [Ph.D. thesis]. Tokyo Institute of Technology; 1995.
20. [20] Fujimoto, K., Obtaining admissible preference orders using hierarchical bipolar Sugeno and Choquet integrals. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence 17:4 (2013), 493–513.
21. [21] Fujimoto K, Murofushi T. Hierarchical decomposition of the Choquet integral. In: Murofushi T, Grabisch M, Sugeno M, editors, Fuzzy measures and integrals: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg; 2000. p. 94–103.
22. [22] Fujimoto, K., Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M., Canonical hierarchical decomposition of Choquet integral over finite set with respect to null additive fuzzy measure. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 06:04 (1998), 345–363.
23. [23] Gonzales C, Perny P. GAI networks for utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR); 2004. p. 224–34.
24. [24] Grabisch, M., The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 89 (1996), 445–456.
25. [25] Grabisch, M., k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92 (1997), 167–189.
26. [26] Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C., Bi-capacities-II: the Choquet integral. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 151:2 (2005), 237–259.
27. [27] Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.-L., Roubens, M., Equivalent representations of set functions. Mathematics of Operations Research 25:2 (2000), 157–178.
28. [28] Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Giove, S., The Choquet integral with respect to a level dependent capacity. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 175 (2011), 1–35.
29. [29] Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R., Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129:1 (2001), 1–47.
30. [30] Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R., Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 191:2 (2008), 416–436.
31. [31] Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R., Robust ordinal regression for value functions handling interacting criteria. European Journal of Operational Research 239:3 (2014), 711–730.
32. [32] Greco, S., Rindone, F., Bipolar fuzzy integrals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 220:1 (2013), 21–33.
33. [33] Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. 1993, J. Wiley, New York.
34. [34] Lahdelma, R., Hokkanen, J., Salminen, P., SMAA—stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 106:1 (1998), 137–143.
35. [35] Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., SMAA-2: stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research 49:3 (2001), 444–454.
36. [36] Mesiar, R., Mesiarová-Zemánková, A., Ahmad, K., Level-dependent Sugeno integral. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17:1 (2009), 167–172.
37. [37] Mousseau, V., Figueira, J.R., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., Climaco, J., Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research 147:1 (2003), 72–93.
38. [38] Murofushi S, Soneda T. Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): interaction index. In: 9th fuzzy systems symposium, Sapporo, Japan; 1993. p. 693–6.
39. [39] Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M., Fujimoto, K., Separated hierarchical decomposition of the Choquet integral. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 05:05 (1997), 563–585.
40. [40] Narukawa Y, Murofushi T. The n-step Choquet integral on finite spaces. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems, Annecy, France; 2002. p. 539–43.
41. [41] Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48:1 (1990), 9–26.
42. [42] Shapley., L.S., A value for n-person games. Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W., (eds.) Contributions to the theory of games II, 1953, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 307–317.
43. [43] R. Słowiński, S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, Rough-set-based decision support. In: Burke EK, Kendall G, editors, Search methodologies: introductory tutorials in optimization and decision support techniques, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 557–609.
44. [44] Smith, R.L., Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Operations Research 32 (1984), 1296–1308.
45. [45] Stewart, T., Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., (eds.) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 2005, Springer, Berlin, 445–460.
46. [46] M. Sugeno, Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, 1974, PhD thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.
47. [47] Sugeno, M., Fujimoto, K., Murofushi, T., A hierarchical decomposition of Choquet integral model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 03:01 (1995), 1–15.
48. [48] Tervonen, T., Figueira, J.R., A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 15:1–2 (2008), 1–14.
49. [49] Tervonen, T., Van Valkenhoef, G., Bastürk, N., Postmus, D., Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 224 (2013), 552–559.
50. [50] Van Valkenhoef, G., Tervonen, T., Postmus, D., Notes on Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 239:3 (2014), 865–867.