Conceptual profile: Modes of thinking and ways of speaking in Science classrooms;Perfil conceptual: Formas de pensar y hablar en las clases de ciencias

Infancia y Aprendizaje

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 475-490

  Mortimer, Eduardo Fleury ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

classroom discourse; Conceptual profile; intersubjectivity; science classrooms

Indexed keywords

EID: 85026252744     PISSN: 02103702     EISSN: 15784126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021037001317117402     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bakhtin, M. M., (1981). The dialogic imagination, ed. by Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M., (1986). Speech Genres & Other Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Billig, M., (1996). Arguing and thinking—A rethorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Doran, R., (1972). Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary scholl children. Journal of Research in Science Education, 9 (2), 127–137.
5. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P., (1994). Constructing Scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5–12.
6. Duit, R., & Treagut, D., (1998). Learning Science—From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond. En B. J., Frase & K. G., Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W., (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.
8. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R., (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (5), 611–628.
9. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R., (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Kuhn, D., (1992). Thinking as Argument. Havard Educational Review, 62, 155–178
11. Lemke, J. L., (1990). Talking Science. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (Trad. cast.: Aprender a hablar ciencia. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997).
12. Machado, A., & Moura, A., (1995). Linguagem no ensino de química. Química Nova na Escola. nov (2), 27–30.
13. Mortimer, E. F., (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–285.
14. Mortimer, E. F., (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in the classroom discourse: an example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (1), 67–82.
15. Mortimer, E. F., & Machado, A. H., (1996). A linguagem numa aula de ciências. Presença Pedagógica, 2 (11), 49–57.
16. Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J., (1978). Junior High School Pupils' Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter: An Interview Study. Science Education, 62 (3), 273–281.
17. Nussbaum, J., (1985). The Particulate Nature of Matter in the Gaseous Phase. En R., Driver, E., Guesne & A., Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. (Trad. cast.: Ideas científicas de niños y adolescentes. Madrid: Morata, 1990)
18. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & Mcgillicuddy, K., (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press. (Trad. cast.: Formas de explicar. La enseñanza de las ciencias en Secundaria. Madrid: Santillana, 1998).
19. Pozo, J. I., y Gómez Crespo, M. A., (1998). Aprender y enseñar ciencia. Madrid: Morata
20. Rommetveit, R., (1979a). On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity. En R., Rommetveit & R. M., Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 93–108). London: Academic Press.
21. Rommetveit, R., (1979b). On common codes and Dynamic residuals in human communication. En R., Rommetveit & R. M., Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 163–175). London: Academic Press.
22. Rommetveit, R., (1979c). On common codes and Dynamic residuals in human communication. En R., Rommetveit & R. M., Blakarv (Eds.), Studies of language, though, and verbal communication (pp. 163–175). London: Academic Press.
23. Rommetveit, R., (1979d). The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. University of Oslo. Typescript.
24. Scott, P., (1996). Social Interactions and Personal Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. En G., Welford, J., Osborne & P., Scott (Eds.), Research in Science Education in Europe—Current Issue and Themes (pp. 325–336). London: The Falmer Press.
25. Scott, P., (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: A Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.
26. Schulman, L. S, (1986). Those who understand: a conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10 (1), 9–15, 43–44.
27. Sutton, C. R., (1992). Words, Science and Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
28. Tulviste, P., (1991). The Cultural-Historical Development of Verbal Thinking. Trans. by M. J. Hall. Commak, NY: Nova Science.
29. Wertsch, J. V., (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. (Trad. cast.: Voces d la mente. Madrid: Visor, 1993).
30. Wertsch, J. V., (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.