Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-82

  Mortimer, Eduardo Fleury ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002175838     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069980200105     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bachelard, G. (1968) The Philosophy of No (New York: The Orion Press) (trans. La philosophie du non (1940) by G. C. Waterston).
2. Bachelard, G. (1975) Les intuitions atomistiques (essai de classification) (Paris: J. Vrin).
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination (edited by Michael Holqust, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist) (Austin: University of Texas Press).
4. Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Bohr, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical descriptions of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48, 696-702.
6. Doran, R. (1972) Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 127-137.
7. Driver, R. (1985) Beyond appearance: the conservation of matter under physical and chemical transformations. In R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds), Children’s Ideas in Science (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
8. Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in Classrooms (London: Routledge).
9. Edwards, A. D. and Westgate, D. P. G. (1987) Investigating Classroom Talk (London: Falmer).
10. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical descriptions of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780.
11. Garnett, P. J. and Hackling, M. W. (1995) Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69-95.
12. Gregory, J. G. (1931) A Short History of Atomism (London: A. and C. Black).
13. Griffiths, A. K. and Preston, K. R. (1992) Grade 12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611-628.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993) Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin, Writing Science: Literacy and Discoursive Power (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
15. Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discoursive Power (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
16. Knight, D. M. (ed.) (1968) Classical Scientific Papers: Chemistry (London: Mills & Boon).
17. Kuhn, D. (1992) Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155-178.
18. Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values (Norwood: Ablex).
19. Lotman, Y. M. (1988) The semiotics of culture and the context of a text. Soviet Psychology, 26, 32-51.
20. Marton, F. (1981) Phenomenography: describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
21. Mercer, N. (1995) The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners (Clevedon: Multilingual Matters).
22. Mercer, N. (1996) Las perspectivas socioculturales y el estudio del discurso en aula. In C. Coll and D. Edwards (eds), Enseñanza, aprendizaje y discurso en el aula: Aproximaciones al estudio del discurso educacional (Madrid: Infancia Y Aprendizaje).
23. Mortimer, E. F. (1995) Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science and Education, 4, 267-285.
24. Newman, D., Griffin, P. and Cole, M. (1989) The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
25. Novick, S. and Nussbaum, J. (1978) Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: an interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281.
26. Novick, S. and Nussbaum, J. (1981) Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: a cross-age study. Science Education, 65, 187-196.
27. Nussbaum, J. (1985) The particulate nature of matter in the gaseous phase. In R. Driver, E. Guesne and A. Tiberghien (eds), Children’s Ideas in Science (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
28. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1941) Le développement des quantités chez I’enfant. Conservation et atomisme (Neuchátel: Delachaux & Niestlé).
29. Popper, K. R. (1972) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
30. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. and McGillicuddy, K. (1996) Explaining Science in the Classroom (Buckingham: Open University Press).
31. Scott, P. (1996) Social interactions and personal meaning making in secondary science classrooms. In G. Welford, J. Osborne and P. Scott (eds), Research in Science Education in Europe: Current Issues and Themes (London: Falmer).
32. Scott, P. (1997) Teaching and learning science concepts in the classroom: talking a path from spontaneous to scientific knowledge. In Anais do Encontró sobre Teoría e Pesquisa em Ensino de Ciencia: Linguagem, Cultura e Cognifao: reflexoes para o ensino de ciencias (Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Educa?ao da UFMG).
33. Stavy, R. (1990) Children’s conceptions of changes in the state of matter: from liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 247-266.
34. Stavy, R. (1988) Children’s conception of gas. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 530-560.
35. Stavy, R. and Stachel, D. (1985) Children’s ideas about ‘solid’ and ‘liquid’. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 407-421.
36. SUTTON, C. R. (1992) Words, Science and Learning (Buckingham: Open University Press).
37. VAN MELSEN, A. G. (1952) From Atomos to Atom: The History of the Concept Atom (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press).
38. VOLOSHINOV, V. N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik) (New York: Seminar Press).
39. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman (eds) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
40. WERTSCH, J. V. (1991) Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).