Target-driven selection and scheduling of methods for sustainable product development

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 161, Issue , 2017, Pages 403-421

  Buchert, Tom ^a   Halstenberg, Friedrich A ^a   Bonvoisin, Jérémy ^a   Lindow, Kai ^a,b   Stark, Rainer ^a,b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN TECHNOLOGY IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision making; Design method; Sustainability; Sustainable product development

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SCHEDULING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ASSISTANCE SYSTEM; DESIGN DECISION SUPPORTS; DESIGN METHOD; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; PROTOTYPICAL IMPLEMENTATION; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DESIGNS; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 85025447961     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.067     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abele, E., Anderl, R., Birkhofer, H., Environmentally-friendly Product Development. Methods and Tools. 2005, Springer, London.
2. Bala, A., Raugei, M., Benveniste, G., Gazulla, C., Fullana, P., Pere, A., Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15(5), 2010, 10.1007/s11367-010-0153-x.
3. Baumann, H., Boons, F., Bragd, A., Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 10:5 (2002), 409–425, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-X.
4. Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process. I. The early stages. Bhamra, T.A., Evans, S., McAloone, T.C., Simon, M., Poole, S., Sweatman, A., (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium nn: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 1999. Tokyo, Japan, 1999, 10.1109/ECODIM.1999.747633.
5. Birch, A., Hon, K.K.B., Short, T., Structure and output mechanisms in design for environment (DfE) tools. J. Clean. Prod. 35 (2012), 50–58, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.029.
6. Boks, C., Pascual, O., The role of success factors and obstacles in design for environment: a survey among Asian electronics companies. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Symposium. Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 2004, 10.1109/ISEE.2004.1299717.
7. Bonvoisin, J., Mathieux, F., Domingo, L., Brissaud, D., Design for energy efficiency: proposition of a guidelines-based tool. Marjanovic, D., Storga, M., Pavkovic, N., Bojcetic, N. Dubrovnik, (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Design Conference, 2010 Croatia.
8. Bovea, M.D., Pérez-Belis, V., A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. J. Clean. Prod. 20:1 (2012), 61–71, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012.
9. Brezet, H., van Hemel, C., Böttcher, H., Clarke, R., Ecodesign: a Promising Approach to Sustainable Production and Consumption. 1997, SMI (Distribution Services) Limited, Hertfordshire.
10. Buchert, T., Kaluza, A., Halstenberg, F.A., Lindow, K., Hayka, H., Stark, R., Enabling product development engineers to select and combine methods for sustainable design. Proceedings of the 21st CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. Trondheim, Norway, 2014, 10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.025.
11. Byggeth, S., Hochschorner, E., Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. J. Clean. Prod. 14:15–16 (2006), 1420–1430, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024.
12. Byggeth, S., Broman, G., Robèrt, K.-H., A method for sustainable product development based on a modular system of guiding questions. J. Clean. Prod. 15:1 (2007), 1–11, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.007.
13. Collado-Ruiz, D., Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, H., Estimating environmental behavior without performing a life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 17:1 (2013), 31–42, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00510.x.
14. Crul, M., Diehl, J.C., Design for Sustainability. A Practical Approach for Developing Economies. 2006, United Nation Environmental Programme, TU Delft, Paris.
15. DIN, Dependability Management - Part 3–3: Application Guide - Life Cycle Costing (IEC 60300-3-3:2004); German Version DIN EN 60300-3-3:2004. 2005.
16. DIN, Project Management – Project Management Systems –Part 2: Processes, Process Model. German Version DIN 69901–2. 2009.
17. Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment Text with EEA relevance. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011L0065&from=en (Accessed 30 May 2016).
18. Dong, C., Zhang, C., Wang, B., Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy multi-attribute utility theory-based cost estimation for environmentally conscious product development. Int. J. Environ. Conscious Des. Manuf. 11:1 (2003), 12–28.
19. Duflou, J.R., Dewulf, W., Eco-impact anticipation by parametric screening of machine system components. Talaba, D., Roche, T., (eds.) Product Engineering - Eco-design, Technologies and Green Energy, 2005, Springer, Dordrecht.
20. Dufrene, M., Zwolinski, P., Brissaud, D., An engineering platform to support a practical integrated eco-design methodology. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 62:1 (2013), 131–134, 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.065.
21. Selecting methods for life cycle design based on the needs of a company. Ernzer, M., Birkhofer, H., (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2002.
22. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E.M., Lehmann, A., Traverso, M., Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:10 (2010), 3309–3322, 10.3390/su2103309.
23. Fu, K., Yang, M., Wood, K., Design principles: the foundation of design. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. 2015. Boston, USA, 2015, 10.1115/DETC2015-46157.
24. G.EN.ESI Report, D. 1.1: State of the Art of Eco-design Tools Applicability in Different Product Design Stages. Report of the EU-funded Project G.EN.ESI: Integrated Software Platform for Green ENgineering DESIgn and Product Sustainability., 2012 http://genesi-fp7.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/D.1.1-Existing-Eco-design-Tools-and-their-Applicability-to-Different-Product-Design-Phases.pdf (Accessed 08 June 2016).
25. Gertsakis, J., Lewis, H., Ryan, C., A Guide to EcoReDesign. Improving the Environmental Performance of Manufactured Products. 1997, Centre for Design at RMIT, Melbourne.
26. Graedel, T.E., Allenby, B.R., Comrie, P.R., Matrix approaches to abridged life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 29(3), 1995, 134A, 10.1021/es00003a751.
27. Granta Material Intelligence, Sustainability with CES EduPack. 2016 https://www.grantadesign.com/education/topics/sustainability.htm (Accessed 08 June 2016).
28. Grießhammer, R., Buchert, M., Gensch, C.-O., Hochfeld, C., Manhart, A., Rüdenauer, I., Ebinger, F., PROSA–product Sustainability Assessment. 2007 http://prosa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/PROSA-gesamt_Finalversion_0407_red.pdf (Accessed 27 May 2016).
29. Großmann, J., Hansen, S., Melzer, L., Günther, J., EuP-implemetierung. Teilprojekt C1. Abele, E., Anderl, R., Birkhofer, H., Rüttinger, B., (eds.) EcoDesign. Von der Theorie in die Praxis, 2008, Springer, Berlin, New York.
30. Hallstedt, S., Ny, H., Robèrt, K.H., Broman, G., An approach to assessing sustainability integration instrategic decision systems for product development. J. Clean. Prod. 18:8 (2010), 703–712, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.017.
31. Halog, A., Schultmann, F., Rentz, O., Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement. J. Clean. Prod., 9(5), 2001, 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00080-9.
32. Halstenberg, F.A., Buchert, T., Bonvoisin, J., Lindow, K., Stark, R., Target-oriented modularization–addressing sustainability design goals in product modularization. Proceding of the 22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. Sydney, Australia, 2015, 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.166.
33. Handfield, R.B., Melnyk, S.A., Calantone, R.J., Curkovic, S., Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48:2 (2001), 189–208, 10.1109/17.922478.
34. Hanssen, O.J., Rønning, A., Rydberg, T., Sustainable Product Development. Final Report from Subproject II in the NEP Project., 1995, Stiftelsen Østfoldforskning, Fredrikstad.
35. Hermann, B., Kroeze, C., Jawjit, W., Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 15:18 (2007), 1787–1796, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.04.004.
36. Hochschorner, E., Assessment of Tools for Environmentally Preferable Procurement with a Life Cycle Perspective: the Case of Acquisition in Swedish Defence. 2004, KTH, Stockholm.
37. Hockerts, K., The Sustainability Radar. A Step towards Corporate Sustainability Accounting. 1996, New Economics Foundation, London.
38. Hoffmann, E., Consumer integration in sustainable product development. Bus. Strategy Environ. 16:5 (2007), 322–338, 10.1002/bse.577.
39. Howarth, G., Hadfield, M., A sustainable product design model. Mater. Des. 27:10 (2006), 1128–1133, 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.016.
40. Janin, M., A Framework of Eco-design in Enterprise. A Challenge: Construction of the Coherence Among Tools and Processes., 2000, ENSAM, Chambéry PhD thesis.
41. Jansen, M., Influences upon Sustainable Product Development in the Developing World. 1995, United Nations Environment Programme, Working Group on Sustainable Product Development, Amsterdam.
42. Jawahir, I.S., Wanigarathne, P.C., Wang, X., Product Design and Manufacturing Processes for Sustainability. Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook. 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 10.1002/9781118985960.meh207.
43. Johansson, G., Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development: a review of state of the art. Environ. Manag. Health 13:1 (2002), 98–107, 10.1108/09566160210417868.
44. Johnson, E.F., Gay, A., A practical, customer-oriented DFE methodology. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on: Electronics and the Environment. Orlando, USA, 1995, 10.1109/ISEE.1995.514949.
45. Kara, S., Ibbotson, S., Kayis, B., Sustainable product development in practice: an international survey. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 25:6 (2014), 848–872, 10.1108/JMTM-09-2012-0082.
46. Kobayashi, H., A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Adv. Eng. Inf. 20:2 (2006), 113–125, 10.1016/j.aei.2005.11.002.
47. ® method. Int. J. Sustain. Dev., 11(1), 2008, 10.1504/IJSD.2008.02038.
48. Kortman, J., van Berkel, R., Lafleur, M., Towards an environmental design toolbox for complex products; preliminary results and experiences from selected projects. Proceedings of the International Conference on Clean Electronics Products and Technology (CONCEPT). 1995. Edinburgh, UK, 1995, 10.1049/cp:19951155.
49. Kumaran, D.S., Ong, S., Tan, R.B.H., Nee, A., Environmental life cycle cost analysis of products. Environ. Manag. Health, 12(3), 2001, 10.1108/09566160110392335.
50. Lenox, M., Ehrenfeld, J.R., Design for environment: a new framework for strategic decisions. Environ. Qual. Manage 4:4 (1995), 37–51, 10.1002/tqem.3310040406.
51. Lindahl, M., Environmental effect analysis - how does the method stand in relation to lessons learned from the use of other design for environment methods. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan, 2001, 10.1109/.2001.992482.
52. Lindahl, M., Engineering Designers’ Requirements on Design for Environment Methods and Tools. Doctoral Thesis, 2005, KTH, Stockholm.
53. Lindahl, M., Ekermann, S., Structure for categorization of ecodesign methods and tools. Proceedings of the 20th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. Singapore, 2013, 10.1007/978-981-4451-48-2_19.
54. Lindow, K., Müller, P., Stark, R., New job roles in global engineering – from education to industrial deployment. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11. Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
55. Luttropp, C., Lagerstedt, J., EcoDesign and the Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J. Clean. Prod. 14:15–16 (2006), 1396–1408, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022.
56. Martens, M.L., Carvalho, M.M., Key factors of sustainability in project management context: a survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 2016, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 (in press), (corrected proof).
57. Masui, K., Sakao, T., Inaba, A., Quality function deployment for environment: QFDE (1st report)-a methodology in early stage of DfE. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2001. Tokyo, Japan, 2001, 10.1109/.2001.992480.
58. Millet, D., Bistagnino, L., Lanzavecchia, C., Camous, R., Poldma, T., Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs?. J. Clean. Prod. 15:4 (2007), 335–346, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.07.016.
59. McAloone, T.C., Pigosso, D.C.A., From ecodesign to sustainable product/service-systems: a journey through research contributions over recent decades. Stark, R., Seliger, G., Bonvoisin, J., (eds.) Sustainable Manufacturing - Challenges, Solutions and Implementation Perspectives, 2017, Springer, Heidelberg, 99–111.
60. Moberg, Å., Environmental Systems Analysis Tools: Differences and Similarities. Master's thesis, 1999, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
61. Navarro, T.G., Rizo, S.C., Ceca, M.J.B., Ruiz, D.C., Ecodesign function and form – classification of ecodesign tools according to their functional aspects. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 05. Melbourne, Australia, 2005.
62. Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., Olsson, L., Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 60:3 (2007), 498–508, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.
63. Neugebauer, S., Chang, Y.-J., Maliszewski, M., Lindow, K., Stark, R., Finkbeiner, M., Life cycle sustainability assessment & sustainable product development: a case study on pedal electric cycles (pedelec). Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
64. Oberender, C., Birkhofer, H., The eco-value analysis – an approach to assigning environmental impacts and costs to customers’ demands. Proceedings of the 8th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2004.
65. Pförtner, A., Buchert, T., Stark, R., 2016. Information management platform for the application of sustainable product development methods. Procedia CIRP 48 (2016), 437–442.
66. Pigosso, D.C.A., Sousa, S.R., Life cycle assessment (LCA): discussion on full-scale and simplified assessments to support the product development process. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Cleaner Production. Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2011.
67. Pigosso, D.C.A., Ecodesign Maturity Model: a Framework to Support Companies in the Selection and Implementation of Ecodesign Practices. 2012, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
68. Pigosso, D.C.A., Rozenfeld, H., McAloone, T.C., Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 59 (2013), 160–173, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040.
69. Pommer, K., Bech, P., Handbook on Environmental Assessment of Products. 2003, Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen.
70. Poulikidou, S., Björklund, A., Tyskeng, S., Empirical study on integration of environmental aspects into product development: processes, requirements and the use of tools in vehicle manufacturing companies in Sweden. J. Clean. Prod. 81 (2014), 34–45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.001.
71. Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Choi, J.-K., Kim, H., Thurston, D., Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. J. Mech. Des., 132(9), 2010, 091004, 10.1115/1.4002308.
72. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006R1907&from=en (Accessed 30 May 2016).
73. Rio, M., Reyes, T., Roucoules, L., A framework for ecodesign: an interface between LCA and design process. Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara 9.1:2011 (2011), 121–126.
74. Rio, M., Reyes, T., Roucoules, L., Toward proactive (eco) design process: modeling information transformations among designers activities. J. Clean. Prod. 39 (2013), 105–116, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.061.
75. Ritzen, S., Lindahl, M., Selection and implementation - key activities to successful use of EcoDesign tools. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2001. Tokyo, Japan, 2001, 10.1109/.2001.992341.
76. Romli, A., Prickett, P., Setchi, R., Soe, S., Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53:2 (2015), 549–571.
77. Rossi, M., Germani, M., Zamagni, A., Review of ecodesign methods and tools. Barriers and strategies for an effective implementation in industrial companies. J. Clean. Prod. 129 (2016), 361–373, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.051.
78. Russo, D., Serafini, M., Rizzi, C., Comparison and classification of eco improvement methods. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 15. Milan, Italy, 2015.
79. Schaltegger, S., Sturm, A., Ökologische Rationalität. Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung. Swiss J. Bus. Res. Pract. 44:4 (1990), 273–290 http://www.jstor.org/stable/24180467.
80. Schischke, K., Mueller, J., Reichl, H., EcoDesign in european small and medium sized enterprises of the electrical and electronics sector status quo and the road towards EuP. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on: Electronics and the Environment. Scottsdale, USA, 2006, 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650067.
81. Schmidt-Bleek, F., Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS - das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. 1994, Birkhäuser, Berlin.
82. Shuaib, M., Seevers, D., Zhang, X., Badurdeen, F., Rouch, K.E., Jawahir, I.S., Product sustainability index (ProdSI). J. Ind. Ecol. 18:4 (2014), 491–507, 10.1111/jiec.12179.
83. Spangenberg, J.H., Fuad-Luke, A., Blincoe, K., Design for Sustainability (DfS): the interface of sustainable production and consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 18:15 (2010), 1485–1493, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.002.
84. Stark, R., Pförtner, A., Integrating ontology into PLM-tools to improve sustainable product development. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 64:1 (2015), 157–160, 10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.018.
85. Ueda, K., Takenaka, T., Váncza, J., Monostori, L., Value creation and decision-making in sustainable society. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technol. 58:2 (2009), 681–700, 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.010.
86. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D., Product Design and Development. fifth ed., 2012, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
87. Unger, N., Schneider, F., Salhofer, S., A review of ecodesign and environmental assessment tools and their appropriateness for electrical and electronic equipment. Prog. Ind. Ecol. Int. J. 5:1 (2008), 13–29, 10.1504/PIE.2008.018536.
88. Vallet, F., Eynard, B., Millet, D., Mahut, S.G., Tyl, B., Bertoluci, G., Using eco-design tools: an overview of experts’ practices. Des. Stud. 34:3 (2013), 345–377, 10.1016/j.destud.2012.10.001.
89. van Weenen, J.C., Towards sustainable product development. J. Clean. Prod. 3:1–2 (1995), 95–100, 10.1016/0959-6526(95)00062-J.
90. Vargas Hernandez, N., Okudan Kremer, G., Schmidt, L.C., Acosta Herrera, P.R., Development of an expert system to aid engineers in the selection of design for environment methods and tools. Expert Syst. Appl. 39:10 (2012), 9543–9553, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.098.
91. VDI, Association of German Engineers (VDI) Guideline 2221, Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products. 1993, VDI, Düsseldorf.
92. VDI, Association of German Engineers (VDI) Guideline 4600, Cumulative Energy Demand (KEA). Beuth, Berlin. 2012.
93. Vezzoli, C., Sciama, D., Life Cycle Design: from general methods to product type specific guidelines and checklists: a method adopted to develop a set of guidelines/checklist handbook for the eco-efficient design of NECTA vending machines. J. Clean. Prod. 14:15 (2006), 1319–1325, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.011.
94. Vinodh, S., Rathod, G., Application of ECQFD for enabling environmentally conscious design and sustainable development in an electric vehicle. Clean. Techn Environ. Policy 13:2 (2011), 381–396, 10.1007/s10098-010-0317-1.
95. Volvo, Volvo Standards 1009, 1 & 1009, 2 & 1009, 11 Company Standards for Materials. Black, White and Grey Lists. 2012 http://www.volvogroup.com/suppliers/global/en-gb/supplierapplication/standardsaccess/pages/stan dards.as px (Accessed 12 March 2013).
96. Wimmer, W., Pamminger, R., Stachura, M., Grab, R., Ecodesign in the electronics industry - achieving legal compliance with the EU-directives and environmentally improving products by using the new EEE-PILOT. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
97. Zhang, F., Rio, M., Allais, R., Zwolinski, P., Carillo, T.R., Roucoules, L., Mercier-Laurent, E., Buclet, N., 2013. Toward an systemic navigation framework to integrate sustainable development into the company. J. Clean. Prod. 54 (2013), 199–214, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.054.