Enabling product development engineers to select and combine methods for sustainable design

Procedia CIRP

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages 413-418

  Bucherta, Tom ^a   Kaluza, Alexander ^c   Halstenberg, Friedrich A ^c   Lindow, Kai ^a   Hayka, Haygazun ^b   Stark, Rainer ^a,b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND DESIGN TECHNOLOGY IPK   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Decision support; Design methods; Method selection; Product development; Sustainability; Sustainable engineering

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECODESIGN; LIFE CYCLE; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION SUPPORTS; DESIGN METHOD; ENGINEERING METHODS; METHOD SELECTION; PROCESS-BASED APPROACH; PRODUCT CREATION PROCESS; SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING; SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84903597509     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22128271     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.025     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Baumann H., Boons F., Bragd A. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 10, 2002. p. 409-425.
2. Morbidoni, A. The ecodesign issue: proposal for a new approach, methodology and tools. Dissertation. Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 2012.
3. Bovea, MD; Pérez-Belis, V. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 20, 2012. p. 61-71.
4. Vercalsteren, A. Integrating the ecodesign concept in small and mediumsized enterprises, Experiences in the Flemish region of Belgium. In: Environmental Management and Health 12, 2001. p. 347-355.
5. Schischke, K.; Mueller, J; Reichl, H. EcoDesign in European small and medium sized enterprises of the electrical and electronics sector. Status quo and the road towards EuP. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 8-11 2006.
6. Johansson, G. Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development: A review of state of the art. In: Environmental Management and Health 13, 2002. p. 98-107.
7. Handfield, RB, Melnyk, SA, Calantone, RJ, Curkovic, S. Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: The gap between theory and practice. In: Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 48 (2), 2001. p. 189-208.
8. Birch, A, Hon, KKB, Short, T. Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 35, 2012. p. 50-58.
9. Ness, B, Urbel-Piirsalu, E, Anderberg, S, Olsson, L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. In: Ecological Economics 60, 2007. p. 498-508.
10. Knight, P, Jenkins, JO. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 2009. p. 549-558.
11. Unger, N, Schneider, F, Salhofer, S. A review of ecodesign and environmental assessment tools and their appropriateness for electrical and electronic equipment. In: Progress in Industrial Ecology, an International Journal 5, 2008. p. 13-29
12. Kaebernick, H; Kara,.; Sun, M. Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. In: Leadership of the Future in Manufacturing 19, 2003. p. 461-468.
13. Grießhammer, R. Product sustainability assessment. PROSA. Freiburg, 2007.
14. Crul, MRM, Diehl, JC. Design for sustainability. A practical approach for developing economies.: UNEP; Delft University of Technology, 2006.
15. Hanssen, O. Jørgen, Rønning, A, Rydberg, T. Sustainable productdevelopment. Fredrikstad: Stiftelsen \Ostfoldforskning, 1995.
16. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) Guideline 2221, Systematic Approach to the Design of Technical Systems and Products, 1993
17. Golloch, R. Downsizing bei Verbrennungsmotoren. Senkung des Kraftstoffverbrauchs und Steigerung des Wirkungsgrads. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
18. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure Guideline 4600, Cumulative energy demand (CED) Terms, definitions, methods of calculation, 2012.
19. Schaltegger, S. Sturm, A. Ökologische Rationalität. Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten. In: Die Unternehmung: Swiss journal of business research and practice 44, 1990.
20. Oberender, C. Birkhofer, H. The Eco-Value Analysis-An ApproachTo Assigning Environmental Impacts And Costs To Customers' Demands. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Design Conference, May 17-20, 2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
21. Graedel, T. E. Allenby, B. R. Industrial ecology. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
22. Brezet, H. van Hemel, C. Böttcher, H. Clarke, R. Ecodesign: a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption: UNEP, 1997.
23. Pommer, K. Bech, P. Handbook on Environmental Assessment of Products: Miljøstyrelsen, 2003.
24. Schmidt-Bleek, F. Wie viel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. Berlin u.a: Birkhäuser, 1994.
25. Hockerts, K. The sustainability radar. A step towards corporate sustainability accounting. London: New Economics Foundation, 1996.
26. Johnson, E. F. Gay, A. A practical, customer-oriented DFE methodology. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium in: Electronics and the Environment, 1995. p. 47-50.
27. Lindahl, M. E-FMEA-A new promising tool for efficient design for environment. In: Proceedings of the First international conference on Environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. Tokyo, Japan 1999. p. 734-739.
28. Dreyer, L. C. Niemann, A. L. Hauschild, M. Z. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99. Does it matter which one you choose? In: International journal of Lifecycle Assessment 8, 2003.p. 191-200.
29. Masui, K. Sakao, T. Inaba, A. Quality function deployment for environment: QFDE-A methodology in early stage of DfE. In: Proceedings EcoDesign 2001: Second International Symposium on: Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 2001. p. 852-857.
30. Halog, A. Schultmann, F. Rentz, O. Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 9, 2001. p. 387-394.
31. Deutsches Institut für Normung DIN EN 60300-3-3. Dependability management Part 3-3: Application guide Life cycle costing, 2005.
32. Deutsches Institut für Normung DIN EN ISO 14040. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines, 2009.
33. E. Abele, R. Anderl, H. Birkhofer und B. Rüttinger, eds.: EcoDesign. Von der Theorie in die Praxis. Berlin, Springer, 2008. p. 13-46
34. Wimmer, W. ECODESIGN Online: The new Internet tool for environmentally conscious product design. In: Proceedings Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Los Alamitos, USA p. 240-243.
35. Luttropp, C. Lagerstedt, J. EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. In: EcoDesign: What's happening? 14, 2006. p. 1396-1408.
36. Volvo. Volvo Standards 1009, 1 &1009, 2 &1009; http://www.volvogroup.com/suppliers/global/engb/ supplierapplication/ standardsaccess/pages/standards.aspx, 2012.