Simulating simple and fallible relevance feedback

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6611 LNCS, Issue , 2011, Pages 593-604

  Baskaya, Feza ^a   Keskustalo, Heikki ^a   Järvelin, Kalervo ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Fallibility; Relevance feedback; Simulation

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

FALLIBILITY; GRADED RELEVANCES; LABORATORY CONDITIONS; PSEUDO-RELEVANCE FEEDBACKS; RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SIMULATION; USER SIMULATION;

ERRORS;

EID: 85025089477     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20161-5_59     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Azzopardi, L., Järvelin, K., Kamps, J., Smucker, M.: Report on the SIGIR 2010 Workshop on the Simulation of Interaction. SIGIR Forum 44(2), 35–47 (2010)
2. Efthimiadis, E.N.: Query expansion. In: Williams, M.E. (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology ARIST, vol. 31, pp. 121–187. Information Today, Inc., Med-ford (1996)
3. Foley, C., Smeaton, A.F.: Synchronous Collaborative Information Retrieval: Techniques and Evaluation. In: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J., Soule-Dupuy, C. (eds.) ECIR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5478, pp. 42–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
4. Jansen, M.B.J., Spink, A., Saracevic, T.: Real Life, Real Users, and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web. Information Processing & Management 36(2), 207–227 (2000)
5. Järvelin, K.: Interactive Relevance Feedback with Graded Relevance and Sentence Extraction: Simulated User Experiments. In: Cheung, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM CIKM 2009), Hong Kong, November 2-6, pp. 2053–2056 (2009)
6. Keskustalo, H., Järvelin, K., Pirkola, A.: The Effects of Relevance Feedback Quality and Quantity in Interactive Relevance Feedback: A Simulation Based on User Modeling. In: Lalmas, M., MacFarlane, A., Rüger, S.M., Tombros, A., Tsikrika, T., Yavlinsky, A. (eds.) ECIR 2006. LNCS, vol. 3936, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
7. Keskustalo, H., Järvelin, K., Pirkola, A.: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Relevance Feedback Based on a User Simulation Model: Effects of a User Scenario on Cumulated Gain Value. Information Retrieval 11(5), 209–228 (2008)
8. Lam-Adesina, A.M., Jones, G.J.F.: Applying Summarization Techniques for Term Selection in Relevance Feedback. In: Proc. of the 24th Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1–9. ACM Press, New York (2001)
9. Marchionini, G., Dwiggins, S., Katz, A., Lin, X.: Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library and Information Science Research 15(1), 35–70 (1993)
10. Pirkola, A., Keskustalo, H., Leppänen, E., Känsälä, A.-P., Järvelin, K.: Targeted S-Gram Matching: A Novel N-Gram Matching Technique for Cross- and Monolin-gual Word Form Variants. Information Research 7(2) (2002), http://InformationR.net/ir/7-2/paper126.html
11. Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(2), 95–145 (2003)
12. Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M., van Rijsbergen, K.: Incorporating user search behaviour into relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(6), 529–549 (2003)
13. Sihvonen, A., Vakkari, P.: Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus. J. Doc. 60(6), 673–690 (2004)
14. Sormunen, E.: Liberal Relevance Criteria of TREC - Counting on Negligible Documents? In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 320–330. ACM Press, New York (2002)
15. Stenmark, D.: Identifying Clusters of User Behavior in Intranet Search Engine Log Files. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(14), 2232– 2243 (2008)
16. Tombros, A., Sanderson, M.: Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval. In: Proc. of the 21st Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 2–10. ACM Press, New York (1998)
17. Turpin, A., et al.: Including Summaries in System Evaluation. In: Proc. of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 508–515. ACM Press, New York (2009)
18. Vakkari, P., Sormunen, E.: The influence of relevance levels on the effectiveness of interactive IR. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 55(11), 963–969 (2004)