Quantifying fisheries ecosystem services of mangroves and tropical artificial urban shorelines

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 803, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 225-237

  Benzeev, Rayna ^a   Hutchinson, Neil ^b   Friess, Daniel A ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Artificial rocky shore; Fish habitat; Nurseries; Singapore; Underwater video; Wetland

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FINFISH; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HABITAT TYPE; MANGROVE; NURSERY GROUND; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROCKY SHORE; SHORELINE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; TROPICAL REGION; UNDERWATER CAMERA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; VIDEOGRAPHY; WETLAND;

SINGAPORE [SOUTHEAST ASIA];

AMBASSIS INTERRUPTA; AMBASSIS KOPSII; RHIZOPHORACEAE; ZENARCHOPTERUS BUFFONIS;

EID: 85024496525     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3299-8     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alongi, D. M., 2009. Paradigm shifts in mangrove biology. In Perillo, G. M. E., E. Wolanski, D. R. Cahoon & M. M. Brinson (eds), Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 615–640.
2. Aburto-Oropeza, O., E. Ezcurra, G. Danemann, V. Valdez, J. Murray & E. Sala, 2008. Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 10456–10459.
3. AVA, 2015. Working together as one: annual report 2014/15. Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore, Government of Singapore. Singapore.
4. Bandaranayake, W. M., 1998. Traditional and medicinal uses of mangroves. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 2: 133–148.
5. Barbier, E. B., 2016. The protective service of mangrove ecosystems: a review of valuation methods: marine Pollution Bulletin special issue: “Turning the tide on mangrove loss”. Marine Pollution Bulletin 109: 676–681.
6. Bassett, D. K. & J. C. Montgomery, 2011. Investigating nocturnal fish populations in situ using baited underwater video: with special reference to their olfactory capabilities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 409: 194–199.
7. Beck, M. W., K. L. Heck Jr., K. W. Able, D. L. Childers, D. B. Eggleston, B. M. Gillanders & R. J. Orth, 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates: a better understanding of the habitats that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve conservation and management of these areas. Bioscience 51: 633–641.
8. Cappo, M., E. Harvey & M. Shortis, 2007. Counting and measuring fish with baited video techniques – an overview. In Lyle, J. M., Furlani, D. M., Buxton, C. D. (eds), Proceedings of the 2006 Australian Society of Fish Biology Conference and Workshop Cutting-edge Technologies in Fish and Fisheries Science, Hobart, August 2006. ASFB: Hobart: 101–114.
9. Carrasquilla-Henao, M. & F. Juanes, 2017. Mangroves enhance local fisheries catches: a global meta-analysis. Fish and Fisheries 18: 79–93.
10. Clarke, K. R., 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 117–143.
11. Collen, B., N. Richman, A. Beresford, A. Chenery & M. Ram, Sampled Red List Index Coordinating Team, 2010. Scatophagus argus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2010-4.RLTS.T155268A4761779.en.
12. Crosetti, D. & S. J. Blaber, (eds), 2015. Biology, Ecology and Culture of Grey Mullets (Mugilidae). CRC Press, Boca Raton.
13. Dahdouh-Guebas, F., C. Mathenge, J. G. Kairo & N. Koedam, 2000. Utilization of mangrove wood products around mida creek (Kenya) amongst subsistence and commercial users. Economic Botany 54: 513–527.
14. Friess, D. A., 2017. Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems 20: 277–291.
15. Friess, D. A., J. Phelps, R. C. Leong, W. K. Lee, A. K. S. Wee, N. Sivasothi & E. L. Webb, 2012. Mandai mangrove, Singapore: lessons for the conservation of Southeast Asia’s mangroves. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 25: 55–65.
16. Froese, R. & D. Pauly. Editors. 2017. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version 06/2016.
17. Gibson-Hill, C. A., 1950. The fishing boats operated from Singapore Island. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 23: 148–170.
18. Haines-Young, R. & M. Potschin, 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): consultation on version 4. In: EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003. August–December 2012. http://cices.eu/.
19. Harrison, I. J. & H. Senou, 1999. Mugilidae. In: Carpenter, K. E., Niem, V. H. (eds), FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific, vol. 4. B.
20. Harvey, E. S., M. Cappo, J. J. Butler, N. Hall & G. A. Kendrick, 2007. Bait attraction affects the performance of remote underwater video stations in assessment of demersal fish community structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 350: 245–254.
21. Hill, R. D., 1980. Singapore – an Asian City State. Geojournal 4: 5–12.
22. Igulu, M. M., I. Nagelkerken, M. Dorenbosch, M. G. Grol, A. R. Harborne, I. A. Kimirei & Y. D. Mgaya, 2014. Mangrove habitat use by juvenile reef fish: meta-analysis reveals that tidal regime matters more than biogeographic region. PLoS ONE 9: e114715.
23. James, G. K., J. O. Adegoke, S. Osagie, S. Ekechukwu, P. Nwilo & J. Akinyede, 2013. Social valuation of mangroves in the Niger delta region of Nigeria. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 9: 311–323.
24. Lai, S., L. H. Loke, M. J. Hilton, T. J. Bouma & P. A. Todd, 2015. The effects of urbanisation on coastal habitats and the potential for ecological engineering: a Singapore case study. Ocean & Coastal Management 103: 78–85.
25. Lee, S. Y., J. H. Primavera, F. Dahdouh-Guebas, K. McKee, J. O. Bosire, S. Cannicci & I. Mendelssohn, 2014. Ecological role and services of tropical mangrove ecosystems: a reassessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography 23: 726–743.
26. Liquete, C., N. Cid, D. Lanzanova, B. Grizzetti & A. Reynaud, 2016. Perspectives on the link between ecosystem services and biodiversity: the assessment of the nursery function. Ecological Indicators 63: 249–257.
27. Loneragan, N. R., N. A. Adnan, R. M. Connolly & F. J. Manson, 2005. Prawn landings and their relationship with the extent of mangroves and shallow waters in western peninsular Malaysia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63: 187–200.
28. Manson, F. J., N. R. Loneragan, B. D. Harch, G. A. Skilleter & L. Williams, 2005. A broad-scale analysis of links between coastal fisheries production and mangrove extent: a case-study for northeastern Australia. Fisheries Research 74: 69–85.
29. Meynecke, J. O., S. Y. Lee & N. C. Duke, 2008. Linking spatial metrics and fish catch reveals the importance of coastal wetland connectivity to inshore fisheries in Queensland, Australia. Biological Conservation 141: 981–996.
30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
31. Monks, N. (ed.), 2006. Brackish-Water Fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Inc, Neptune City.
32. Murphy, H. M. & G. P. Jenkins, 2010. Observational methods used in marine spatial monitoring of fishes and associated habitats: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 236–252.
33. Nagelkerken, I., G. Van der Velde, M. W. Gorissen, G. J. Meijer, T. Van’t Hof & C. Den Hartog, 2000. Importance of mangroves, seagrass beds and the shallow coral reef as a nursery for important coral reef fishes, using a visual census technique. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51: 31–44.
34. Nagelkerken, I., A. M. de Schryver, M. C. Verweij, F. Dahdouh-Guebas, G. Van der Velde & N. Koedam, 2010. Differences in root architecture influence attraction of fishes to mangroves: a field experiment mimicking roots of different length, orientation, and complexity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 396: 27–34.
35. Nagelkerken, I., M. Sheaves, R. Baker & R. M. Connolly, 2015. The seascape nursery: a novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna. Fish and Fisheries 16: 362–371.
36. Nam, V. N., S. D. Sasmito, D. Murdiyarso, J. Purbopuspito & R. A. MacKenzie, 2016. Carbon stocks in artificially and naturally regenerated mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong delta. Wetlands Ecology and Management 24: 231–244.
37. Richards, D. R. & D. A. Friess, 2016. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000-2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113: 344–349.
38. Scales, I., D. A. Friess, L. Glass & L. Ravaoarinorotsihoarana, 2017. Rural livelihoods and mangrove degradation in south-west Madagascar: lime production as an emerging threat. Oryx: 1-5.
39. SeaGIS, 2016. CAL—Stereo Camera Calibration. SeaGIS Pty. www.seagis.com.au.
40. Sheaves, M., 2005. Nature and consequences of biological connectivity in mangroves systems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 302: 293–305.
41. Sheaves, M. & B. Molony, 2000. Short-circuit in the mangrove food chain. Marine Ecology Progress Series 199: 97–109.
42. Sheaves, M., R. Johnston & R. Baker, 2016. Use of mangroves by fish: new insights from in-forest videos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 549: 167–182.
43. Shinnaka, T., M. Sano, K. Ikejima, P. Tongnunui, M. Horinouchi & H. Kurokura, 2007. Effects of mangrove deforestation on fish assemblage at Pak Phanang Bay, southern Thailand. Fisheries Science 73: 862–870.
44. TEEB, 2010. Biodiversity, ecosystems and ecosystem services. In Kumar, P. (ed.), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundation. UNEP/Earthscan, London: 41–112.
45. Teh, L. C. & U. R. Sumaila, 2013. Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish and Fisheries 14: 77–88.
46. Waltham, N. J. & R. M. Connolly, 2007. Artificial waterway design affects fish assemblages in urban estuaries. Journal of Fish Biology 71: 1613–1629.
47. Wasserman, R. J. & N. A. Strydom, 2011. The importance of estuary head waters as nursery areas for young estuary-and marine-spawned fishes in temperate South Africa. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 94: 56–67.
48. Watson, D. L., E. S. Harvey, M. J. Anderson & G. A. Kendrick, 2005. A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Marine Biology 148: 415–425.
49. Weinstein, M. P., S. Y. Litvin & V. G. Guida, 2005. Considerations of habitat linkages, estuarine landscapes, and the trophic spectrum in wetland restoration design. Journal of Coastal Research SI(40): 51–63.
50. Weis, J. W. & P. Weis, 2005. Use of intertidal mangrove and sea wall habitats by coral reef fishes in the Wakatobi Marine Park, Indonesia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 53: 119–124.
51. Whitfield, A. K., 2017. The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries: 1–36.
52. Whitelaw, A. W., K. J. Sainsbury, G. J. Dews & R. A. Campbell, 1991. Catching characteristics of four fish-trap types on the North West Shelf of Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 42: 369–382.
53. Wraith, J., T. Lynch, T. E. Minchinton, A. Broad & A. R. Davis, 2013. Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 477: 189–199.
54. Yee, A. T. K., W. F. Ang, S. Teo, S. C. Liew & H. T. W. Tan, 2010. The present extent of mangrove forests in Singapore. Nature in Singapore 3: 139–145.