Curious partner: An autonomous system that proactively dialogues with human teammates

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 10194, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Mehta, S S ^a   Doucette, E A ^b   Curtis, J W ^b  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support system; grounding; human autonomy interaction

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; ELECTRIC GROUNDING; ENGINES; INFERENCE ENGINES; MILITARY OPERATIONS; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; AUTONOMY SYSTEMS; BAYESIAN INFERENCE; DECISION SUPPORTS; DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; FEEDBACK MECHANISMS; HUMAN-AUTONOMY INTERACTION; PARTNER INTERACTION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 85024394768     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: 1996756X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.2263205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., and Salas, E."Personality and group performance, " Review of Personality and Social Psychology 14, 91-112 (1988).
2. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., and Christiansen, N. D."The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams, " Group & Organization Management 24 (1), 28-45 (1999).
3. Clark, H. H., [Using language], Cambridge university press (1996).
4. Chai, J., She, L., Fang, R., Ottarson, S., Littley, C., Liu, C., and Hanson, K."Collaborative eort towards common ground in situated human-robot dialogue, " in [ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction], 33-40, IEEE Computer Society (2014).
5. Jones, H. And Rock, S."Dialogue-based human-robot interaction for space construction teams, " in [Aerospace Conference Proceedings, 2002. IEEE], 7, 3645-3653, IEEE (2002).
6. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., andBaur, C."Collaboration, dialogue, human-robot interaction, " in [Robotics Research], 255-266, Springer (2003).
7. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S.-l., and Kiesler, S."Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot, " in [ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication], 158-163, IEEE (2005).
8. Fong, T., Kunz, C., Hiatt, L. M., and Bugajska, M."The human-robot interaction operating system, " in [Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)], 41-48, ACM (2006).
9. Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D., and Nourbakhsh, I."Using a robot proxy to create common ground in exploration tasks, " in [2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)], 375-382 (March 2008).
10. Kiesler, S."Fostering common ground in human-robot interaction, " in [ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication], 729-734 (Aug 2005).
11. Buschmeier, H. And Kopp, S."Co-constructing grounded symbolsfeedback and incremental adaptation in human-agent dialogue, " KI-Kunstliche Intelligenz 27 (2), 137-143 (2013).
12. Peltason, J., Rieser, H., Wachsmuth, S., and Wrede, B."On grounding natural kind terms in human-robot communication, " KI-Kunstliche Intelligenz 27 (2), 107-118 (2013).
13. Mehta, S., Ton, C., Doucette, E., and Curtis, J."Curious partner: An approach to realize common ground in human-autonomy collaboration, " in [Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2016 IEEE International Conference on], 004040-004045, IEEE (2016).
14. Jing, C., Jing-qi, F., Wei, S., and Jing, C."Learning bayesian network parameters based on iterative learning control, " in [2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet)], 4161-4165 (April 2011).
15. Li, S., Zhang, J., Huang, K., and Gao, C."A graph partitioning approach for bayesian network structure learning, " in [2014 33rd Chinese Control Conference (CCC)], 2887-2892 (July 2014).
16. Mehta, S. S., Berg-Yuen, P. E. K., Waden, D., Pasiliao, E. L., and Curtis, J. W."An efficient framework for particle lter-based urban target tracking, " in [Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) Conf. ], AIAA 2012-4480 (2012).
17. Mehta, S. S., McCourt, M., Doucette, E. A., and Curtis, J. W."A touch interface for soft data modeling in bayesian estimation, " in [Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)], 3732-3737 (2014).
18. Dani, A., McCourt, M., Curtis, J. W., and Mehta, S. S."Information fusion in human-robot collaboration using neural network representation, " in [Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)], 2114-2120 (2014).
19. Muir, B. M."Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems, " Ergonomics 37 (11), 1905-1922 (1994).
20. Muir, B. M. And Moray, N."Trust in automation: Part II. experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation, " Ergonomics 39 (3), 429-460 (1996).
21. Rickert, M., Foster, M. E., Giuliani, M., By, T., Panin, G., and Knoll, A."Integrating language, vision and action for human robot dialog systems, " in [Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient Interaction], Stephanidis, C., ed., 987-995, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007).
22. Bannat, A., Blume, J., Geiger, J. T., Rehrl, T., Wallho, F., Mayer, C., Radig, B., Sosnowski, S., andKuhnlenz, K."Amultimodalhuman-robot-dialog applyingemotional feedbacks, " in [Proceedings Social Robotics: Second International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR 2010], Ge, S. S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., and Tan, Y. K., eds., 1-10, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010).
23. Johnson-Roberson, M., Bohg, J., Skantze, G., Gustafson, J., Carlson, R., Rasolzadeh, B., and Kragic, D."Enhanced visual scene understanding through human-robot dialog, " in [2011 IEEE/RSJ International Con-ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)], 3342-3348, IEEE (2011).