A numerical study on the cumulative out-of-plane damage to church masonry façades due to a sequence of strong ground motions

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 46, Issue 15, 2017, Pages 2717-2737

  Casolo, Siro ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

cumulative damage assessment; dynamics; masonry; out of plane; repeated earthquakes; rigid body spring model

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKES; GRAPHIC METHODS; MASONRY MATERIALS; RIGID STRUCTURES; SEISMIC DESIGN;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; CUMULATIVE DAMAGE; HISTORICAL BUILDINGS; MASONRY; OUT-OF PLANE; OUT-OF-PLANE RESPONSE; RIGID BODY SPRING MODELS; STRONG GROUND MOTION;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; LOADING; MASONRY; MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRONG MOTION;

EID: 85023636842     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2927     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ITACA-Working-Group. Data base of the Italian strong motion records. http://itaca.mi.ingv.it
2. Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F. ITACA (Italian accelerometric archive): a web portal for the dissemination of Italian strong-motion data. Seismol Res Lett. 2008;79(5):716-722.
3. Pacor F, Paolucci R, Luzi L, et al. Overview of the Italian strong motion database ITACA 1.0. Bull Earthq Eng. 2011;9:1723-1739.
4. Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S. The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of sdof systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2003;32(2):291-308.
5. Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, Macorini L. Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions. Eng Struct. 2004;26(13):2021-2035.
6. Hatzigeorgiou G, Beskos Dc. Inelastic displacement ratios for sdof structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Eng Struct. 2009;31(11):2744-2755.
7. Moustafa A, Takewaki I. Characterization of earthquake ground motion of multiple sequences. Earthq Struct. 2012;3(5):629-647.
8. Mouyiannou A, Penna A, Rota M, Graziotti F, Magenes G. Implications of cumulated seismic damage on the seismic performance of unreinforced masonry buildings. Bull New Zealand Soc Earthq Eng. 2014;47(2):157-170.
9. Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Ruiz-Garca J. Nonlinear response analysis of SDOF systems subjected to doublet earthquake ground motions: a case study on 2012 Varzaghan-Ahar events. Eng Struct. 2016;110:281-292.
10. Das S, Gupta VK, Srimahavishnu V. Damage-based design with no repairs for multiple events and its sensitivity to seismicity model. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(3):307-325.
11. Li Q, Ellingwood BR. Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shockaftershock earthquake sequences. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(3):405-427.
12. Goda K, Taylor CA. Effects of aftershocks on peak ductility demand due to strong ground motion records from shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2012;41(15):2311-2330.
13. Di Sarno L. Effects of multiple earthquakes on inelastic structural response. Eng Struct. 2013;56:673-681.
14. Zhai CHb, Zheng Z, Li Sb, Xie Lc. Seismic analyses of a RCC building under mainshock–aftershock seismic sequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015;74:46-55.
15. Casolo S, Uva G. Nonlinear analysis of out-of-plane masonry façades: full dynamic versus pushover methods by rigid body and spring model. Earthqu Eng Struct Dyn. 2013;42(4):499-521.
16. Casolo S, Milani G. Simplified out-of-plane modelling of three-leaf masonry walls accounting for the material texture. Constr Build Mater. 2013;40:330-351.
17. Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V. Le Chiese e il Terremoto. Trieste: Lint press; 1994. In Italian.
18. Giuffré A. Protection of the Architectural Heritage Against Earthquakes, chap. A mechanical model for statics and dynamics of historical masonry buildings. No. 359 in CISM Courses and Lectures. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
19. Doglioni F. Codice di pratica (linee guida), bollettino ufficiale n.15. Regione Marche. In Italian; 2000.
20. Casolo S, Neumair S, Parisi MA, Petrini V. Analysis of seismic damage patterns in old masonry church façades. Earthq Spectra. 2000;16(4):757-773.
21. D'Ayala D, Speranza E. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spectra. 2003;19(3):479-509.
22. Lagomarsino S, Podestà S. Damage and vulnerability assessment of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra. 2004;20(S1):S271-S283.
23. Lagomarsino S, Resemini S. The assessment of damage limitation state in the seismic analysis of monumental buildings. Earthq Spectra. 2009;25(2):323-346.
24. Da Porto F, Silva B, Costa C, Modena C. Macro-scale analysis of damage to churches after earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. J Earthq Eng. 2012;16(6):739-758.
25. rdECCOMAS, Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Corfù, Greece; 2011.
26. Chávez M, Meli R. Shaking table testing and numerical simulation of the seismic response of a typical Mexican colonial temple. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2012;41(2):233-253.
27. Dolatshahi K, Yekrangnia M. Out-of-plane strength reduction of unreinforced masonry walls because of in-plane damages. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2015;44(13):2157-2176.
28. Peña F, García N. Numerical evaluation of the seismic behavior of façades of mexican colonial churches. Eng Fail Anal. 2016;62:164-177.
29. Luciano R, Sacco E. Homogenization technique and damage model for old masonry material. Int J Solids Struct. 1997;34(4):3191-3208.
30. Roca P, Cervera M, Gariup G, Pela' L. Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions. Classical and advanced approaches. Arch Comput Meth Eng. 2010;17:299-325.
31. Baraldi D, Bullo S, Cecchi A. Continuous and discrete strategies for the modal analysis of regular masonry. Int J Solids Struct. 2016;84:82-98.
32. Asteris P, Plevris V, Sarhosis V, Papaloizou L, Mohebkhah A, Komodromos P. Handbook of Research on Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Historic Structures, chap. Numerical modeling of historic masonry structures; 2015. 213–256.
33. Ferreira TM, Costa AA, Arêde A, Gomes A, Costa A. Experimental characterization of the out-of-plane performance of regular stone masonry walls, including test setups and axial load influence. Bull Earthq Eng. 2015;13(9):2667-2692.
34. Ferreira T, Costa A, Costa A. Analysis of the out-of-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry: a literature review. Int J Archit Heritage. 2015;9(8):949-972.
35. Casolo S. Modelling the out-of-plane seismic behaviour of masonry walls by rigid elements. Earthqu Eng Struct Dyn. 2000;29(12):1797-1813.
36. Rondelet J-B. Traité Théorique et pratique de L'art de Bâtir: Paris; 1812–1817.
37. Anthoine A, Magenes G, Magonette G. Shear compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In: Proceeding of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 1994; Wien:1657-1662.
38. Magenes G, Calvi G. In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1997;26(11):1091-1112.
39. Griffith MC, Vaculik J, Lam NTK, Wilson J, Lumantarna E. Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2007;36(6):801-821.
40. David PR, Guccione M. La protezione del patrimonio culturale (1998). La questione sismica. Atlante dei tipi costruttivi murari in italia. Italia Settentrionale (Mannoni T) e Meridionale (Saccone T, Peduto P). II seminario nazionale di studio. Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali,. Rome, Italy; 1998.
41. Silva B, Dalla Benetta M, Da Porto F, Valluzzi MR. Compression and sonic tests to assess effectiveness of grout injection on three-leaf stone masonry walls. Int J Archit Heritage. 2014;8(3):408-435.
42. Silva B, Benetta MD, da Porto F, Modena C. Experimental assessment of in-plane behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls. Constru Build Mater. 2014;53:149-161.
43. Silva B, Pigouni AE, Valluzzi MR, Modena C. Calibration of analytical formulations predicting compressive strength in consolidated three-leaf masonry walls. Constr Build Mater. 2014;64:28-38.
44. Circolare n. 617. istruzioni per l'applicazione delle "nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni" di cui al d.m. 14-01-2008. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 47, Suppl. Ordinario n. 27 edn. 26; 2009.
45. Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S. Theory of Plates and Shells: McGraw-Hill; 1959.
46. Uang CM, Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1990;19(1):77-90.
47. Costa AA, Arêde A, Costa A, Oliveira CS. In situ cyclic tests on existing stone masonry walls and strengthening solutions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2011;40(4):449-471.
48. Ferreira T, Costa A, Arêde A, Varum H, Costa A. In situ out-of-plane cyclic testing of original and strengthened traditional stone masonry walls using airbags. J Earthq Eng. 2016;20(5):749-772.
49. Bothara JK, Dhakal RP, Mander JB. Seismic performance of an unreinforced masonry building: an experimental investigation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2010;39(1):45-68.
50. Krenk S. Extended state-space time integration with high-frequency energy dissipation. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2008;73(12):1767-1787.
51. Housner G. Earthquake Engineering, chap. : Strong ground motion: Prentice-Hall; 1970. 75–91.
52. Katsanos EI, Sextos AG, Manolis GD. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2010;30(4):157-169.
53. Bradley B, Cubrinovski M, MacRae G, Dhakal R. Ground-motion prediction equation for SI based on spectral acceleration equations. Bull Seismol Soc America. 2009;99(1):277-285.
54. Bradley BA. Empirical correlations between peak ground velocity and spectrum-based intensity measures. Earthq Spectra. 2012;28(1):17-35.
55. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti. Decreto Ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008 ”Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29, Suppl. Ordinario edn. 4; 2008.