Shaking table testing and numerical simulation of the seismic response of a typical Mexican colonial temple

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 233-253

  Chávez, Marcos ^a   Meli, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Damping; Nonlinear analyses; Seismic response; Shaking table test; Stone masonry

Indexed keywords

DAMPING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MASONRY MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NANOINDENTATION; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOFTWARE TESTING; TESTING; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL MODEL; ANALYTICAL SIMULATIONS; BASE MOTION; BASE SHEAR; BELL TOWERS; CONSTITUTIVE LAW; DAMAGE PATTERNS; DAMPING COEFFICIENTS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; GEOMETRIC SCALE; HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOTIONS; LOCAL VIBRATIONS; ME-XICO; PLAIN CONCRETE; REASONABLE ACCURACY; SHAKING TABLE TESTING; SHAKING TABLE TESTS; STONE MASONRY; VERTICAL COMPONENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; CRACKING; DAMPING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MASONRY; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST; VIBRATION;

EID: 84855899250     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1127     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Tomazevic M, Velechovosky T. Some aspects of testing small-scale masonry building models on simple earthquake simulators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21(11):945-963.
2. Chávez M. Estudio experimental de las propiedades mecánicas de mamposterías de piedra natural (Experimental study on mechanical properties of stone masonry). Master Dg Thesis, UNAM, México, 2005.
3. Rinawi A, Clough R. Improved amplitude fitting for frequency and damping estimation. Proceedings of the 10th International Modal Analysis Conference. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, 1992; 893-898.
4. Rivera D, Meli R, Sánchez R, Orozco B. Evaluation of the measured seismic response of the Mexico City Cathedral. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37(10):1249-1268. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.808.
5. ANSYS Inc. Release 11.0, Documentation for ANSYS, 2007.
6. Willam K, Warnke E. Constitutive model for triaxial behavior of concrete. Seminar on Concrete Structures Subjected to Triaxial Stresses, International Association of Bridge an Structural Engineering Conference, Bergamo, Italy, vol. 19, 1975; 174.
7. Giordano A, Mele E, De Luca A. Modelling of historical masonry structures: comparison of different approaches through a case study. Engineering Structures 2002; 24(8):1057-1069.
8. García N, Meli R. On structural bases for building the mexican convent churches from the sixteenth century. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 2009; 3:24-51. DOI: 10.1080/15583050701842344.
9. Dahmani L, Khennane A, Kac S. Crack identification in reinforced concrete beams using ANSYS software. Strength of Materials 2010; 42(2):232-240.
10. Thomas J, Ramaswamy A. Nonlinear analysis of shear dominant prestressed concrete beams using ANSYS. International ANSYS Conference Proceedings, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2006. Available at:.
11. Barchielli M, Domenichi L. Analisi statica e di la stabilitá di una ciminiera in muratura, Corso di laurea in Ingegneria civile, Univesitá degli studi di Firenze, Italia, 2003; 1-54.
12. Bertocci S, Betti M, Di Carlo A. Il progetto di restauro della Torre di Galatrona a Bucine. Bolletino Ingegneri 2006; 54(4):3-9.
13. Hemmaty Y. Modeling of the shear force transferred between cracks in reinforced and fiber reinforced concrete structures. International ANSYS Conference Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.