The effect of virtual endoscopy on diagnostic accuracy and airway management strategies in patients with head and neck pathology: a prospective cohort study;Effet de l’endoscopie virtuelle sur la précision diagnostique et les stratégies de prise en charge des voies aériennes chez les patients atteints de pathologies de la tête et du cou : une étude de cohorte prospective

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 1101-1110

  El Boghdadly, Kariem ^a   Onwochei, Desire N ^a   Millhoff, Britta ^a   Ahmad, Imran ^a  

^a GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGIST; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; ENDOSCOPY; EPIGLOTTIS; HEAD AND NECK DISEASE; HEAD AND NECK SURGERY; HUMAN; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATION CONTROL; STRATEGIC PLANNING; VIRTUAL ENDOSCOPY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEAD; NECK; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; COHORT STUDIES; ENDOSCOPY; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; NECK; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85023201901     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-017-0929-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: Anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 617-31.
2. TM). Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 74-8.
3. McDonagh DL, Benedict PE, Kovac AL, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in elderly patients. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 318-29.
4. Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 991-8.
5. Amao R, Zornow MH, Cowan RM, Cheng DC, Morgte JB, Allard MW. Use of sugammadex in patients with a history of pulmonary disease. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 289-97.
6. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 827-48.
7. Norskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrom LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 272-81.
8. Forastiere A, Koch W, Trotti A, Sidransky D. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1890-900.
9. Rosenblatt W, Ianus AI, Sukhupragarn W, Fickenscher A, Sasaki C. Preoperative endoscopic airway examination (PEAE) provides superior airway information and may reduce the use of unnecessary awake intubation. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 602-7.
10. Pearce A. Recognition and management of the difficult airway. In: Gleeson M, Browning GG, Burton M, et al. (Eds). Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery - 7th Edition. Edward Arnold Ltd; 2008: 473-4.
11. Mark Z, Bajzik G, Nagy A, Bogner P, Repa I, Strausz J. Comparison of virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the management of airway stenosis. Pathol Oncol Res 2008; 14: 313-9.
12. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: An open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17: 205-16.
13. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-4.
14. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351: h5527.
15. Boet S, Naik VN, Diemunsch PA. Virtual simulation training for fibreoptic intubation. Can J Anesth 2009; 56: 87-8.
16. Boet S, Bould MD, Schaeffer R, et al. Learning fibreoptic intubation with a virtual computer program transfers to ‘hands on’ improvement. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 31-5.
17. Baker PA, Weller JM, Baker MJ, et al. Evaluating the ORSIM® simulator for assessment of anaesthetists’ skills in flexible bronchoscopy: aspects of validity and reliability. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117: i87-91.
18. Ahmad I, Millhoff B, John M, Andi K, Oakley R. Virtual endoscopy—a new assessment tool in difficult airway management. J Clin Anesth 2015; 27: 508-13.
19. Byrne AT, Walshe P, McShane D, Hamilton S. Virtual laryngoscopy-preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 38-42.
20. Sgalambro F, Sanfilippo F, Santonocito C, Caltavuturo C, Grillo Cl. Virtual laryngoscopy and combined laryngoscopic-bronchoscopic approach for safemanagement of obstructive upper airways lesions. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 304-6.
21. Yentis SM. Predicting difficult intubation-worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 105-9.
22. Huitink JM, Bouwman RA. The myth of the difficult airway: airway management revisited. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 244-9.
23. Finkelstein SE, Schrump DS, Nguyen DM, Hewitt SM, Kunst TF, Summers RM. Comparative evaluation of super high-resolution CT scan and virtual bronchoscopy for the detection of tracheobronchial malignancies. Chest 2003; 124: 1834-40.
24. Boiselle P, Reynolds KF, Ernst A. Multiplanar and three-dimensional imaging of the central airways with multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 301-8.
25. Men S, Ecevit MC, Topçu I, Kabakci N, Erdag TK, Sutay S. Diagnostic contribution of virtual endoscopy in diseases of the upper airways. J Digit Imaging 2007; 20: 67-71.
26. Walshe P, Hamilton S, McShane D, McConn Walsh R, Walsh MA, Timon C. The potential of virtual laryngoscopy in the assessment of vocal cord lesions. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27: 98-100.
27. Summers RM, Shaw DJ, Shelhamer JH. CT virtual bronchoscopy of simulated endobronchial lesions: effect of scanning, reconstruction, and display settings and potential pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 947-50.
28. Summers RM, Aggarwal NR, Sneller MC, et al. CT virtual bronchoscopy of the central airways in patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis. Chest 2002; 121: 242-50.
29. De Wever W, Vandecaveye V, Lanciotti S, Verschakelen JA. Multidetector CT-generated virtual bronchoscopy: an illustrated review of the potential clinical indications. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 776-82.
30. Bauer TL, Steiner KV. Virtual bronchoscopy: clinical applications and limitations. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2007; 16: 323-8.
31. Rogalla P, Nischwitz A, Gottschalk S, Huitema A, Kaschke O, Hamm B. Virtual endoscopy of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 946-50.
32. Burke AJ, Vining DJ, McGuirt WF Jr, Postma G, Browne JD. Evaluation of airway obstruction using virtual endoscopy. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 23-9.