United States 舑 Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Original Complaint by the European Communities) 舑 Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004: A Legal and Economic Analysis

World Trade Review

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 254-279

  Howse, Robert ^a   Staiger, Robert W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Wisconsin Department Natural Rsrc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85022694927     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745606001467     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. E. Cannizzaro, “The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures,” EJIL (2001) 889–916, pp. 902–903.
2. Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.) New Directions in International Economic Law, Kluwer Law International (The Hague), 2000.
3. Schwartz, Warren F. and Alan O. Sykes, “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization,” Journal of Legal Studies 31, 2002.
4. Winters, L. Alan, “Regionalism and the Rest of the World: The Irrelevance of the Kemp–Wan Theorem,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1997
5. Staiger, Robert W. and Frank A. Wolak, “Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1994, pp. 51–118;
6. Krupp, Corinne M. and Patricia S. Pollard, “Market Responses to Antidumping Laws: Some Evidence from the US Chemical Industry,” Canadian Journal of Economics 29(1), February 1996, pp. 199–227.
7. Shin, Hyun Ja, “Possible Instances of Predatory Pricing in Recent Antidumping Cases,” in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum, 1998, pp. 81–98.
8. J. H. Jackson, “The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding–Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation,” 91 American Journal of International Law 60 (1997).
9. A. O. Sykes, “The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?” in M. Bronckers and R. Quick, eds., New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 347–357.
10. Susan Esserman and Robert Howse 2004, “The WTO on trial,” Foreign Affairs, 82(1), 130–140.
11. Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaidis, (2003), “Enhancing WTO legitimacy constitutionalization or global subsidiarity?” Governance, 16(1), 73–94.
12. John H. Jackson, “Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligations to Comply or Option to ‘Buy Out’?” American Journal of International Law, January 2004, 109–125.