Capturing middle school students’ understandings of design thinking

Taking Design Thinking to School: How the Technology of Design Can Transform Teachers, Learners, and Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 76-93

  Goldman, Shelley ^a,b   Zielezinski, Molly B ^c   Vea, Tanner ^c   Bachas Daunert, Stephanie ^c   Kabayadondo, Zaza ^d  

^a Design Lab (REDlab)   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Smith College ^*

^d SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021891763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781317327585     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3-23.
2. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
3. Capobianco, B.M., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304-328.
4. Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., & Royalty, A. (2009). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21(1), 37-53.
5. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
7. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Gutiérrez, K.D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (2003). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. In S. Goodman, T. Lillis, J. Maybin, & N. Mercer (Eds.), Language, literacy and education: A reader (pp. 171-187). Trent: Trentham Books.
9. Gutiérrez, K.D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148-164.
10. Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. New York, NY: Crown Business.
11. Muller, M.J. (2003). Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), Handbook of HCI. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies (NAENA). (2010). Grand challenges for engineering. Retrieved from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org.
13. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
14. Research in Education Design (2016, February 22). Retrieved from: http://web.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/.
15. Rittel, H.W., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
16. Sheppard, S.D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.