Light curve analysis from kepler spacecraft collected data

ICMR 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 93-98

  Nigri, Eduardo ^a   Arandjelović, Ognjen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Astronomy; Big Data; Pattern recognition; Photometry; Random forests; Space; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ASTRONOMY; DATA MINING; DECISION TREES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOMETRY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; VECTOR SPACES;

ASTRONOMICAL DATA; ASTROPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; AUTOMATIC TECHNIQUE; LARGE CORPORA; PHOTOMETRIC DATA; RANDOM FORESTS; SPACE; THRESHOLD-CROSSING;

BIG DATA;

EID: 85021807271     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3078971.3080544     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. F. Abel, Q. Gao, G. J. Houben, and K. Tao. Analyzing user modeling on Twi.er for personalized news recommendations. In Proc. International Conference User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pages 1-12, 2011.
2. V. Andrei and O. Arandjelović. Identification of promising research directions using machine learning aided medical literature analysis. In Proc. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 2471- 2474, 2016.
3. O. Arandjelović. Discovering hospital admission pa.erns using models learnt from electronic hospital records. Bioinformatics, 31(24):3970-3976, 2015.
4. O. Arandjelović. Learnt quasi-transitive similarity for retrieval from large collections of faces. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4883-4892, 2016.
5. O. Arandjelović. Weighted linear fusion of multimodal data - a reasonable baseline? In Proc. ACM Conference on Multimedia, pages 851-857, 2016.
6. A. Beykikhoshk, O. Arandjelović, D. Phung, and S. Venkatesh. Hierarchical Dirichlet process for tracking complex topical structure evolution and its application to autism research literature. In Proc. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1:550-562, 2015.
7. A. Beykikhoshk, O. Arandjelović, D. Phung, and S. Venkatesh. Overcoming data scarcity of Twi.er: using tweets as bootstrap with application to autism-related topic content analysis. In Proc. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, pages 1354-1361, 2015.
8. A. Beykikhoshk, O. Arandjelović, D. Phung, S. Venkatesh, and T. Caelli. Using Twi.er to learn about the autism community. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 5(1):5-22, 2015.
9. C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2007.
10. G. V. Bodenhausen, S. Gabriel, and M. Lineberger. Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11(4):320-323, 2000.
11. W. J. Borucki, D. Koch, G. Basri, N. Batalha, and et al. Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results. Science, 327(5968):977-980, 2010.
12. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123-140, 1996.
13. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001.
14. M. Chan, D. Estève, C. Escriba, and E. Campo. A review of smart homes?present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 91(1):55-81, 2008.
15. C. Chew and G. Eysenbach. Pandemics in the age of Twi.er: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLOS ONE, 5(11):e14118, 2010.
16. J. L. Coughlin, F. Mullally, S. E. Thompson, J. F. Rowe, C. J. Burke, D. W. Latham, N. M. Batalha, A. Ofir, B. L. Charles, and C. E. Henze. Planetary candidates observed by Kepler. VII. The first fully uniform catalog based on the entire 48- month data set (Q1-Q17 DR24). The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 224(1):12, 2016.
17. P. Cunningham and S. J. Delany. k-nearest neighbour classifiers. Multiple Classifier Systems, pages 1-17, 2007.
18. D. R. Cutler, T. C. Edwards, K. H. Beard, A. Cutler, K. T. Hess, J. Gibson, and J. J. Lawler. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88(11):2783-2792, 2007.
19. M. N. Fanelli, J. M. Jenkins, S. T. Bryson, E. V. Flintana, and et al. Kepler Data Processing Handbook. NASA Ames Research Center, 2011.
20. G. Feffweis and S. Alamouti. 5G: personal mobile internet beyond what cellular did to telephony. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2):140-145, 2014.
21. P. Ghosh and B. Manjunath. Robust simultaneous registration and segmentation with sparse error reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(2):425-436, 2013.
22. S. B. Howell, C. Sobeck, M. Haas, M. Still, and et al. The K2 mission: characterization and early results. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 126(938):398, 2014.
23. J. M. Jenkins, D. A. Caldwell, H. Chandrasekaran, J. D. Twicken, and et al. Overview of the Kepler science processing pipeline. The Astrophysical Journal Le.ers, 713(2):L87, 2010.
24. A. Jordan. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: a comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14:841, 2002.
25. R. S. J. Kim, J. V. Kepner, M. Postman, M. A. Strauss, and et al. Detecting clusters of galaxies in the sloan digital sky survey I: Monte Carlo comparison of cluster detection algorithms. The Astronomical Journal, 123(1):20pp., 2002.
26. J. Lin and D. Ryaboy. Scaling big data mining infrastructure: the Twifier experience. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsle.er, 14(2):6-19, 2013.
27. R. Martin and O. Arandjelović. Multiple-object tracking in clustered and crowded public spaces. In Proc. International Symposium on Visual Computing, 3:89-98, 2010.
28. S. D. McCauli., J. M. Jenkins, J. Catanzarite, C. J. Burke, J. L. Coughlin, J. D. Twicken, P. Tenenbaum, S. Seader, J. Li, and M. Cote. Automatic classification of Kepler planetary transit candidates. The Astrophysical Journal, 806(1):6, 2015.
29. J. Mercer. Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of integral equations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 209:415-446, 1909.
30. P. M. Nadkarni. Drug safety surveillance using de-identified EMR and claims data: issues and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 17(6):671-674, 2010.
31. E. Nigri and O. Arandjelović. Machine learning based detection of Kepler objects of interest. In Proc. ICME Workshop on Emerging Multimedia Systems and Applications, 2017.
32. S. F. Oliveira, K. Fürlinger, and D. Kranzlmüller. Trends in computation, communication and storage and the consequences for data-intensive science. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Embedded So.ware and Systems & High Performance Computing and Communication, pages 572-579, 2012.
33. F. Provost and T. Fawce. Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1(1):51-59, 2013.
34. B. Schölkopf, A. Smola, and K. Müller. Advances in Kernel Methods - SV Learning, chapter Kernel principal component analysis., pages 327-352. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
35. A. Szalay. Extreme data-intensive scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(6):34-41, 2011.
36. V. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
37. I. Vasiljeva and O. Arandjelović. Towards sophisticated learning from EHRs: increasing prediction specificity and accuracy using clinically meaningful risk criteria. In Proc. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 2452-2455, 2016.
38. H.-F. Yu, F.-L. Huang, and C.-J. Lin. Dual coordinate descent methods for logistic regression and maximum entropy models. Machine Learning, 85(1-2):41-75, 2011.
39. B. Zadrozny and C. Elkan. Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naive Bayesian classifiers. In Proc. IMLS International Conference on Machine Learning, 1:609-616, 2001.