Effect of Gum arabic on distribution behavior of nanocellulose fillers in starch film

Applied Nanoscience (Switzerland)

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 137-142

  Vigneshwaran, Nadanathangam ^a   Ammayappan, L ^b   Huang, Qingrong ^c  

^a ICAR CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COTTON TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b CENTRAL SHEEP AND WOOL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Gum arabic; Nanocellulose; Nanocomposites; Polarized microscopy; Surface energy

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMOLECULES; BIOPOLYMERS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; CONTACT ANGLE; FILLERS; HIGH ENERGY FORMING; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; NANOCOMPOSITES; STARCH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

BIOPOLYMER FILMS; GUM ARABIC; HIGH SURFACE ENERGY; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; POLARIZED MICROSCOPY; POTENTIAL DEMAND; UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION; WATER VAPOR PERMEABILITY;

NANOCELLULOSE;

EID: 85021748579     PISSN: 21905509     EISSN: 21905517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-011-0020-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Al-Assaf S, Sakata M, McKenna C, Aoki H, Phillips G (2009) Molecular associations in acacia gums. Struct Chem 20(2):325–336. doi:10.1007/s11224-009-9430-3
2. Arvanitoyannis IS (1999) Totally and partially biodegradable polymer blends based on natural and synthetic macromolecules: preparation, physical properties, and potential as food packaging materials. J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys C 39(2):205–271
3. Beckham GT, Bomble YJ, Matthews JF, Taylor CB, Resch MG, Yarbrough JM, Decker SR, Bu L, Zhao X, McCabe C, Wohlert J, Bergenstrahle M, Brady JW, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Crowley MF (2010) The O-glycosylated linker from the Trichoderma reesei Family 7 cellulase is a flexible, disordered protein. Biophys J 99(11):3773–3781. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.032
4. Chen Y, Liu C, Chang PR, Cao X, Anderson DP (2009) Bionanocomposites based on pea starch and cellulose nanowhiskers hydrolyzed from pea hull fibre: effect of hydrolysis time. Carbohydr Polym 76(4):607–615. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.030
5. Dickinson E (2003) Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocolloids 17(1):25–39. doi:10.1016/s0268-005x(01)00120-5
6. French D (1984) Organization of starch granules. In: Whistler RL, BeMiller JN, Paschall EF (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology. Academic Press Inc, London, pp 183–247
7. Gennadios A, Ghorpade VM, Weller CL, Hanna MA (1996) Heat curing of soy protein films. Trans ASABE 39(2):575–579
8. Kacuráková M, Smith AC, Gidley MJ, Wilson RH (2002) Molecular interactions in bacterial cellulose composites studied by 1D FT-IR and dynamic 2D FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 337(12):1145–1153. doi:10.1016/s0008-6215(02)00102-7
9. Kampeerapappun P, Aht-ong D, Pentrakoon D, Srikulkit K (2007) Preparation of cassava starch/montmorillonite composite film. Carbohydr Polym 67(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.012
10. Kannan R, Rahing V, Cutler C, Pandrapragada R, Katti KK, Kattumuri V, Robertson JD, Casteel SJ, Jurisson S, Smith C, Boote E, Katti KV (2006) Nanocompatible chemistry toward fabrication of target-specific gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 128(35):11342–11343. doi:10.1021/ja063280c
11. Khan RA, Salmieri S, Dussault D, Uribe-Calderon J, Kamal MR, Safrany A, Lacroix M (2010) Production and properties of nanocellulose-reinforced methylcellulose-based biodegradable films. J Agric Food Chem 58(13):7878–7885. doi:10.1021/jf1006853
12. Kumar AP, Singh RP (2008) Biocomposites of cellulose reinforced starch: improvement of properties by photo-induced crosslinking. Bioresour Technol 99(18):8803–8809. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.045
13. −1. J Polymer Sci 39(135):269–278. doi:10.1002/pol.1959.1203913521
14. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X (2006) Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites–reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 63(2):198–204. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.027
15. Mali S, Grossmann MVE, GarcIa MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE (2005a) Mechanical and thermal properties of yam starch films. Food Hydrocoll 19(1):157–164. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.05.002
16. Mali S, Sakanaka LS, Yamashita F, Grossmann MVE (2005b) Water sorption and mechanical properties of cassava starch films and their relation to plasticizing effect. Carbohydr Polym 60(3):283–289. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.003
17. Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Seo G (2005) FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res 340(3):417–428. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027
18. Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5(5):1671–1677. doi:10.1021/bm034519+
19. Romero-Bastida CA, Bello-Pérez LA, García MA, Martino MN, Solorza-Feria J, Zaritzky NE (2005) Physicochemical and microstructural characterization of films prepared by thermal and cold gelatinization from non-conventional sources of starches. Carbohydr Polym 60(2):235–244. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.004
20. Roque ACA, Bicho A, Batalha IL, Cardoso AS, Hussain A (2009) Biocompatible and bioactive gum arabic coated iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. J Biotechnol 144(4):313–320. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.08.020
21. Satyamurthy P, Jain P, Balasubramanya RH, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanowhiskers from cotton fibres by controlled microbial hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 83(1):122–129. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.07.029
22. Teixeira EdM, Pasquini D, Curvelo AAS, Corradini E, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A (2009) Cassava bagasse cellulose nanofibrils reinforced thermoplastic cassava starch. Carbohydrate Polymers 78(3):422–431. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.034
23. Wenjuan Z (2011) Study on nanocellulose/starch composites. Adv Mater Res 187:544–547
24. Xiong H, Tang S, Tang H, Zou P (2008) The structure and properties of a starch-based biodegradable film. Carbohydr Polym 71(2):263–268. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.035