Evaluating patient and public involvement in health research: from theoretical model to practical workshop

Health Expectations

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 826-835

  Gibson, Andy ^a   Welsman, Jo ^b   Britten, Nicky ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

evaluation; health research; knowledge spaces; mapping experiences; public involvement; theoretical framework

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL HEALTH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

CAREGIVERS; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL HEALTH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 85021728818     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12486     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Department of Health (DoH). NHS Constitution. London: HMSO; 2015.
2. Morrow E, Ross F, Grocott P, Bennett J. A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. Int J Consum Stud. 2010;34:532–539.
3. Popay J, Collins M. with the PiiAF Study Group (eds). The Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework Guidance. Liverpool and Exeter: Universities of Lancaster; 2014. http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/piiaf-guidance-jan14.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2016.
4. Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35:628–632.
5. Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, McNeilly E, Goodman C, et al. ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study. Health Serv Deliv Res [Online]. 2015;3:38.
6. NIHR Research Design Services. Patient and public involvement in health and care research: a handbook for researchers, 2014. http://www.rds.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/RDS-PPI-Handbook-2014-v8-FINAL.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2016.
7. Gibson A, Britten N, Lynch J. Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement. Health. 2012;16:531–547.
8. Popay J, Williams G. Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:759–768.
9. Elliott E, Williams G. Developing public sociology through health impact assessment. Sociol Health Illn. 2008;30:1101–1116.
10. Duckenfield M, Rangnekar D. The Rise of Patient Groups and Drug Development: Towards a Science of Patient Involvement. London, University College London; 2004.
11. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action (Volume 2: Lifeworld and System). Cambridge: Polity Press; 1987.
12. Habermas J. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
13. Bourdieu P. What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley J Sociol. 1987;32:1–17.
14. Bourdieu P. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990.
15. Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: Fraser N, ed. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. London: Routledge; 1997:69–98.
16. NRES/INVOLVE. Patient and public involvement in research and research ethics committee review. 2009.
17. Staley K. ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2015;1:6.