A critical review of the stamp, fram and accimap systemic accident analysis models

Advances in Human Aspects of Road and Rail Transportation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 385-394

  Underwood, Peter ^a   Waterson, Patrick ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Accimap; FRAM; STAMP; Systems approach

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; FERROELECTRIC RAM; STAMPING;

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; ACCIMAP; CRITICAL REVIEW; FRAM; SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS APPROACH;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 84990865884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b12320     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Bamber, L. 2003. Risk management: Techniques and practices. In. Safety at work. 6th edn, eds. J.R. Ridley and J. Channing. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 227-262.
2. Belmonte, F., Schoen, W., and Heurley, L., et al. 2011. Interdisciplinary safety analysis of complex socio-technological systems based on the functional resonance accident model: An application to railway traffic supervision. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96(2): 237-249.
3. Branford, K. 2011. Seeing the big picture of mishap: Applying the AcciMap approach to analyze system accidents. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors 1(1): 31-37.
4. Branford, K. 2007. An investigation into the validity and reliability of the AcciMap approach. Australian National University.
5. Branford, K., Naikar, N., and Hopkins, A. 2009. Guidelines for accimap analysis. In. Learning from high reliability organisations. ed. A. Hopkins. Sydney, Australia: CCH Australia, pp. 193-212.
6. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3(2): 77-101.
7. Herrera, I.A. and Woltjer, R. 2010. Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95(12): 1269-1275.
8. Hollnagel, E. 2004. Barriers and accident prevention. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
9. Hollnagel, E. and Goteman, Ö. 2004. The functional resonance accident model. In. Cognitive System Engineering in Process Control 2004.
10. Hollnagel, E. and Speziali, J. 2008. Study on developments in accident investigation methods: A survey of the’state-of-the-art. SKI Report 2008:50. Sophia Antipolis, France: Ecole des Mines de Paris.
11. Hovden, J., Størseth, F., and Tinmannsvik, R.K. 2011. Multilevel learning from accidents-case studies in transport. Safety Science 49(1): 98-105.
12. Johansson, B. and Lindgren, M. 2008. A quick and dirty evaluation of resilience enhancing properties in safety critical systems. In: Third Symposium on Resilience Engineering, eds. E. Hollnagel, F. Pieri and E. Rigaud. Juan-les-Pins, France.
13. Johnson, C.W. and de Almeida, I.M. 2008. An investigation into the loss of the Brazilian space programme’s launch vehicle VLS-1 V03. Safety Science 46(1): 38-53.
14. Johnson, C.W. and Holloway, C.M. 2003. The ESA/NASA SOHO mission interruption: Using the STAMP accident analysis technique for a software related ‘mishap’. Software: Practice and Experience 33(12): 1177-1198.
15. Kontogiannis, T. and Malakis, S. 2012. A systemic analysis of patterns of organizational breakdowns in accidents: A case from helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 99: 193-208.
16. Ladkin, P.B. 2005. Why-because analysis of the Glenbrook, NSW rail accident and comparison with Hopkins’s accimap. Research Report RVS-RR-05-05. Bielefeld, Germany: Bielefeld University.
17. Lehto, M. and Salvendy, G. 1991. Models of accident causation and their application: Review and reappraisal. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 8: 173-205.
18. Leplat, J. 1984. Occupational accident research and systems approach. Journal of Occupational Accidents 6(1-3): 77-89.
19. Leveson, N. 2004. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Science 42(4): 237-270.
20. Lindberg, A., Hansson, S.O., and Rollenhagen, C. 2010. Learning from accidents-what more do we need to know? Safety Science 48(6): 714-721.
21. Rasmussen, J. 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science 27(2-3): 183-213.
22. Reason, J. 2008. The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Farnham: Ashgate.
23. Reiman, T. and Rollenhagen, C. 2011. Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96(10): 1263-1274.
24. Salmon, P., Williamson, A., and Lenné, M., et al. 2010. Systems-based accident analysis in the led outdoor activity domain: Application and evaluation of a risk management framework. Ergonomics 53(8): 927-939.
25. Salmon, P.M., Cornelissen, M., and Trotter, M.J. 2012. Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Safety Science 50(4): 1158-1170.
26. Santos-Reyes, J. and Beard, A.N. 2006. A systemic analysis of the Paddington railway accident. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 220(2): 121-151.
27. Schwaninger, M. 2006. System dynamics and the evolution of the systems movement. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23(5): 583-594.
28. Sklet, S. 2004. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111: 29-37.
29. Skyttner, L. 2005. General systems theory: Problems, perspectives, practice. 2nd edn. London: World Scientific Publishing Ltd.
30. Stringfellow, M.V. 2010. Accident analysis and hazard analysis for human and organizational factors. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31. Svedung, I. and Rasmussen, J. 2002. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: Mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Safety Science 40(5): 397-417.
32. Svenson, O., Lekberg, A., and Johansson, A.E.L. 1999. On perspective, expertise and differences in accident analyses: Arguments for a multidisciplinary integrated approach. Ergonomics 42(11): 1561-1571.
33. Thomas, C. and Bevan, N. 1996. Usability context analysis: A practical guide. Version 4.04. Teddington: National Physical Laboratory.
34. Wiegmann, D.A. and Shappell, S.A. 2003. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Burlington, USA: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.