Mode of first delivery and severe maternal complications in the subsequent pregnancy

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 96, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1053-1062

  Colmorn, Lotte B ^a   Krebs, Lone ^b   Klungsøyr, Kari ^c,d   Jakobsson, Maija ^e   Tapper, Anna Maija ^e,f   Gissler, Mika ^g,h   Lindqvist, Pelle G ⁱ   Källen, Karin ^j,k   Gottvall, Karin ^j   Bordahl, Per E ^c,l   Bjarnadóttir, Ragnheiður I ^m   Langhoff Roos, Jens ^a  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b Holbaek University Hospital   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^f HYVINKÄÄ HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^g NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^h KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

ⁱ KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^j NATIONAL BOARD OF HEALTH AND WELFARE   (Sweden)

^k LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^l HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^m LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Iceland)

more..

Author keywords

abnormally invasive placenta; cesarean; hysterectomy; intended mode of delivery; maternal morbidity; population study; severe postpartum hemorrhage; Uterine rupture

Indexed keywords

ABNORMALLY INVASIVE PLACENTA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; FINLAND; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; ICD-10; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NORWAY; PERINATAL PERIOD; PLACENTA DISORDER; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SWEDEN; UTERINE ATONY; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PLACENTA ACCRETA; SCANDINAVIA; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PLACENTA ACCRETA; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; SCANDINAVIAN AND NORDIC COUNTRIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85021372504     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13163     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Butwick AJ, Raleigh L, Maeda A, Kuklina E, et al. Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:384.e1–11.
2. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):907–12.
3. Daltveit AK, Tollanes MC, Pihlstrom H, Irgens LM. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1327–34.
4. Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS, et al. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176:455–60.
5. Silver RM. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:315–23.
6. Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:56.e1–6.
7. Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM, Uddin SF. Maternal Morbidity for Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries, According to Previous Cesarean History: new Data From the Birth Certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–13.
8. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148343.
9. Report of Nordic Perinatal Statistics 2016. Available online at: https://www.thl.fi/fi/web/thlfi-en/statistics/statistics-by-topic/sexual-and-reproductive-health/parturients-deliveries-and-births/nordic-perinatal-statistics (accessed 16 January, 2017)
10. Colmorn LB, Petersen KB, Jakobsson M, Lindqvist PG, Klungsoyr K, Kallen K, et al. The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:734–44.
11. Dodd J, Crowther CA. Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: a survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43:226–31.
12. Carpentieri AM. Overview of the 2015 AMerican Congress pf Obstetricians and Gynecologist’ survey on Professional liability http://www.ACOG.org2015. Available online at: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Professional-Liability/2015-Survey-Results (accessed 20 January, 2017)
13. Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):342–50.
14. Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Muller M, Surbek D. Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean” A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:905–10.
15. Jakobsson M, Tapper AM, Colmorn LB, Lindqvist PG, Klungsoyr K, Krebs L, et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: results from the prospective Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study (NOSS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:745–54.
16. Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, Colmorn LB, Klungsoyr K, Bjarnadottir RI, et al. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016;123:1348–55.
17. Cole SR, Hernan MA. Fallibility in estimating direct effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:163–5.
18. Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR, Greene T, Varner MW, Silver RM. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:799–804.
19. Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52893.
20. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P; United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System Steering Committee. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:97–105.
21. Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, et al. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1486–92.
22. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2009;116:1069–78.
23. Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1042–6.
24. Publications Committee SfM-FM, Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:430–9.
25. Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M, Ravelli A, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, et al. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121:216–23.
26. Brahmalakshmy BL, Kushtagi P. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:755–62.
27. Berube L, Arial M, Gagnon G, Brassard N, Boutin A, Bujold E. Factors associated with lower uterine segment thickness near term in women with previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:581–7.
28. Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:321–7.
29. Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS; Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001192.
30. Kok N, Ruiter L, Lindeboom R, de Groot C, Pajkrt E, Mol BW, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;195:214–8.
31. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–9.
32. Nair M, Soffer K, Noor N, Knight M, Griffiths M. Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007434.
33. van Dillen J, Zwart JJ, Schutte J, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe acute maternal morbidity and mode of delivery in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1460–5.
34. Holm C, Langhoff-Roos J, Petersen KB, Norgaard A, Diness BR. Severe postpartum haemorrhage and mode of delivery: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119:596–604.
35. Al-Zirqi I, Vangen S, Forsen L, Stray-Pedersen B. Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage. BJOG. 2008;115:1265–72.