Microsoft Academic is one year old: the Phoenix is ready to leave the nest

Scientometrics

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 1887-1894

  Harzing, Anne Wil ^a   Alakangas, Satu ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021271385     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2454-3     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Elsevier (2016) Scopus: Content coverage guide. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/scopus_content_coverage_guide.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2017.
2. Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or perish. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish.
3. Harzing, A. W. (2013). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel Prize winners. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1057–1075.
4. Harzing, A. W. (2016). Microsoft Academic (Search): A Phoenix arisen from the ashes? Scientometrics, 108(3), 1637–1647.
5. Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804.
6. Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2017). Microsoft Academic: Is the Phoenix getting wings? Scientometrics, 110(1), 371–383.
7. Harzing, A. W., Alakangas, S., & Adams, D. (2014). hIa: An individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences. Scientometrics, 99(3), 811–821.
8. Hug, S. E., & Brändle, M. P. (2017). The coverage of Microsoft Academic: Analyzing the publication output of a university. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.05539.