De novo yeast genome assemblies from MinION, PacBio and MiSeq platforms

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Giordano, Francesca ^a   Aigrain, Louise ^a   Quail, Michael A ^a   Coupland, Paul ^b   Bonfield, James K ^a   Davies, Robert M ^a   Tischler, German ^c   Jackson, David K ^a   Keane, Thomas M ^a   Li, Jing ^d   Yue, Jia Xing ^d   Liti, Gianni ^d   Durbin, Richard ^a   Ning, Zemin ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85021200151     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03996-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. Dna sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74(12), 5463-5467 (1977).
2. Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 333-351 (2016).
3. Liu, L. et al. Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2012, Article ID 251364 (2012).
4. Glenn, T. 2016 NGS field guide: Overview. http://www.molecularecologist.com/next-gen-fieldguide-2016 (2016).
5. Quick, J. et al. Real-time, portable genome sequencing for Ebola surveillance. Nature 530, 228-232 (2016).
6. Hoenen, T. et al. Nanopore sequencing as a rapidly deployable ebola outbreak response tool. Emerg Infect Dis 22 (2015).
7. Faria, N. R. Zibra project: real-time sequencing of zika virus in brazil. https://nanoporetech.com/publications/zibra-project-realtime-sequencing-zika-virus-brazil (2016).
8. Parker, J., Helmstetter, A. J., Devey, D. S. & Papadopulos, A. S. T. Field-based species identification in eukaryotes using single molecule, real-time sequencing. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Labs Journals), doi:10.1101/107656 (2017).
9. Judge, K., Harris, S. R., Reuter, S., Parkhill, J. & Peacock, S. J. Early insights into the potential of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 2775-2778 (2015).
10. Greninger, A. L. et al. Rapid metagenomic identification of viral pathogens in clinical samples by real-time nanopore sequencing analysis. Genome Medicine 7, 99 (2015).
11. Schmidt, K. et al. Identification of bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance directly from clinical urines by nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkw397 (2016).
12. Istace, B. et al. de novo assembly and population genomic survey of natural yeast isolates with the oxford nanopore minion sequencer. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Labs Journals), doi:10.1101/066613 (2016).
13. Koren, S. et al. Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads. Nature Biotechnology 30, 693-700 (2012).
14. Koren, S., Walenz, B., Berlin, K., Miller, J. & AM, P. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Research, doi:10.1101/gr.215087.116 (2017).
15. Chin, C. et al. Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Nature Methods, doi:10.1038/ nmeth.4035 (2016).
16. Lin, Y., Yuan, J., Kolmogorov, M., Shen, M. & Pevzner, P. Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs. PNAS 113, 52, doi:10.1101/048413 (2016).
17. Li, H. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 32(14), 2103-2110 (2016).
18. Vaser, R., Sović, I., Nagarajan, N. & Sikic, M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Research, doi:10.1101/gr.214270.116 (2016).
19. Cao, M. et al. Scaffolding and completing genome assemblies in real-time with nanopore sequencing. Nature Communications 8, Article number: 14515 (2017).
20. Antipov, D., Korobeynikov, A., McLean, J. & Pevzner, P. hybridSPades: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads. Bioinformatics 32(7), 1009-15 (2016).
21. Nurk, S. et al. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. Research in Computational Molecular Biology: 17th Annual International Conference, RECOMB 2013, Beijing, China, April 7-10, 2013. Proceedings 158-170 (2013).
22. Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. Quast: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29(8), 1072-1075 (2013).
23. Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with bwa-mem. arXiv: 1303.3997v2 [q-bio.GN] (2013).
24. Loman, N., Quick, J. & Simpson, J. A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nature Methods 12, 733-735 (2015).
25. Yue, J.-X. et al. Contrasting genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nature Genetics, doi:10.1038/ng.3847 (2017).
26. Loman, N. & Quinlan, A. Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(23), 3399-3401 (2014).
27. Kurtz, S. et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biology 5:R12 (2004).