Evaluation of groundwater remediation technologies based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approaches

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Wang, Hao ^a   Cai, Yanpeng ^a,b   Tan, Qian ^b,c   Zeng, Yong ^d  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^c CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

Author keywords

Groundwater remediation technologies; MCDA; Shengli oil field

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GAME THEORY; GROUNDWATER; HEALTH RISKS; OIL FIELDS; PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION; POLLUTION;

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; COOPERATIVE GAME THEORY; GROUND WATER REMEDIATION; MCDA; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

REMEDIATION;

DECISION MAKING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GROUNDWATER; LEAKAGE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OIL FIELD; OIL POLLUTION; PETROLEUM; PUBLIC HEALTH; REMEDIATION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CHINA; SHANDONG; SHENGLI FIELD;

EID: 85021185787     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w9060443     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Lv, X.L.; Sun, J.C. Review on remediation technology for petrochemical hydrocarbon contamination of groundwater. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2014, 42, 5567-5571.
2. Li, M.L.; Dong, W.H. Health risk assessment of typical petroleum contaminated groundwater and soil in northeast China. China Rural Water Hydropower 2016, 7, 67-71.
3. Yu, C.; Yin, X.A.; Yang, Z.F.; Cai, Y.P.; Sun, T. A shorter time step for eco-friendly reservoir operation does not always produce better water availability and ecosystem benefits. J. Hydrol. 2016, 540, 900-913.
4. Tan, Q.; Huang, G.H.; Cai, Y.P.; Yang, Z.F. A non-probabilistic programming approach enabling risk-aversion analysis for supporting sustainable watershed development. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4771-4788.
5. Zhang, B.Q.; An, D.; Wang, Y.; Liang, H.H.; Zhou, L.; Xi, B.D.; Tang, J. An optimization methodology of groundwater remediation technologies of contaminated sites in the desert areas by multi-criteria decision analysis. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2016, 10, 5521-5527.
6. Li, C.H.; Sun, L.; Jia, J.X.; Cai, Y.P.; Wang, X. Risk assessment of water pollution sources based on an integrated k-means clustering and set pair analysis method in the region of Shiyan, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 557-558, 307-316.
7. Zhai, M.Z.; Zhang, K.L.; Dang, L.; Qin, W.; Ma, W.P. Study on American storage tank leakage prevention technique system. Autom. Pet. Chem. Ind. 2016, 52, 14-17.
8. USEPA. UST Program Facts, Washington, DC, USA. [EB/OL]. 2013. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/oust/pnhs/ustfacts.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2016).
9. Shang, J.T.; Wang, Z. Review of remediation technologies for oil-contaminated soil and effect of different soil amendments on bioremediation efficacy. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2016, 41, 122-125.
10. Zhang, S.Y.; Su, X.X.; Lin, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, Y. Experimental study on the multi-media PRB reactor for the remediation of petroleum-contaminated groundwater. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 1-8.
11. Saghi, H.; Lakzian, E. Optimization of the rectangular storage tanks for the sloshing phenomena based on the entropy generation minimization. Energy 2017, 128, 564-574.
12. Chen, H.L. Research progress in microbial remediation of petroleum-contaminated shallow aquifer. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2015, 22, 66-72.
13. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, J.S.; Zhang, D.; Deng, C.G. Investigation on pollution characteristics of petroleum hydrocarbon in shallow groundwater around gas stations. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2016, 10, 131-136.
14. Cai, Y.P.; Yue, W.C.; Xu, L.Y.; Yang, Z.F.; Rong, Q.Q. Sustainable urban water resources management considering life-cycle environmental impacts of water utilization under uncertainty. Resour. Conserv. Recyl. 2016, 108, 21-40.
15. Hu, H.T. An enhanced remediation technology for contaminated groundwater. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 253-255, 1089-1092.
16. Han, H.L.; Chen, Z.; Yang, J.M.; Miao, C.C.; Zhang, K.; Jin, W.B.; Liu, Z. Field scale demonstration of fungi-bacteria augmented remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. 2008, 29, 454-461.
17. Li, P.; Tian, R.; Xue, C.; Wu, J. Progress, opportunities, and key fields for groundwater quality research under the impacts of human activities in China with a special focus on western China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 13224-13234.
18. Lv, H. Research on Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminants and Enhanced In-Situ Remediation in Groundwater. Ph. D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2014.
19. Zhao, Y.S. Risk management and screening of remediation technologies for contaminated groundwater site. J. Jilin Univ. 2012, 42, 1426-1433.
20. Li, W.;Wang, M.Y.; Han, Z.T.; Zhang, M.; Liu, L.Y. Screening process of brownfield site groundwater remedial technologies: A case study of an abandoned chemical factory contaminated site. Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol. 2016, 3, 131-140.
21. Bai, L.P.; Luo, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Yan, Z.G.; Li, F.S. Research on the screening method of soil remediation technology at contaminated sites and its application. Environ. Sci. 2015, 36, 4218-4224.
22. Bossel, H. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications; International Institute of Sustainable Development: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1999; pp. 20-55.
23. Bossel, H. The human actor in ecological-economic models: Policy assessment and simulation of actor orientation for sustainable development. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34, 337-355.
24. Loucks, D.P. Sustainability Criteria for Water Resources System; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; pp. 33-90.
25. Loucks, D.P. Sustainable water resources management. Water Int. 2000, 25, 3-10.
26. Faures, J.M. Indicators for Sustainable Water Resources Development; Land andWater Development Division, FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; pp. 1-10.
27. Meng, B.; Chi, G. Evaluation index system of green industry based on maximum information content. Singap. Econ. Rev. 2016.
28. Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, Z. Social risk assessment index system by composite catastrophe models: A case study in contemporary china. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management; Springer: Singapore, 2017.
29. Chen, S.J.J.; Hwang, C.L.; Beckmann, M.J.; Krelle, W. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Lect. Notes Econ. Math. Syst. 2011, 375, 1-531.
30. Baas, S.M.; Kwakernaak, H. Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica 1977, 13, 47-58.
31. Bonissone, P.P. A fuzzy sets based linguistic approach: Theory and applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Winter Simulation, Orlando, FL, USA, 3-5 December 1980; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1980; pp. 99-111.
32. Chen, S.M. A new approach to handling fuzzy decision-making problems. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1988, 18, 1012-1016.
33. Efstathiou, J.; Rajkovic, V. Multi-attribute decision making using a fuzzy heuristic approach. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1979, 9, 326-333.
34. Efstathiou, J.; Tong, R. Ranking fuzzy sets: A dession theoretic approach. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1982, 2, 655-659.
35. Kerre, E.E. The use of fuzzy set theory in electrocardiological diagnostics. In Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis; Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E., Eds.; North-Holland Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 277-278.
36. Wenstop, F. Fuzzy set simulation models in a systems dynamic perspective. Kybernetes 1976, 5, 209-218.
37. Wang, P.; Zhu, Z.;Wang, Y. A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the saw, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Inf. Sci. 2016, 345, 27-45.
38. Xue, Y.X.; You, J.X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, H.C. An integrated linguistic MCDM approach for robot evaluation and selection with incomplete weight information. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 5452-5467.
39. Mardani, A.; Jusoh, A.; Zavadskas, E.; Zakwan, N.; Valipour, A.; Kazemilari, M. Proposing new hierarchical framework to evaluating of quality management practices: A new combined fuzzy hybrid mcdm approach. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2016, 17.
40. Karsak, E.E.; Dursun, M. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 82, 82-93.
41. Hipel, K.W. Fuzzy set methodologies in multi-criteria modeling. In Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes; Gupta, M.M., Sanchez, E., Eds.; North-Holland Publishing: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 279-287.
42. Cheng, K.S. Development of a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Municipal Solid Waste Management. Master's Thesis, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada, 2000.
43. Jain, R. A procedure for multi-aspect decision making using fuzzy sets. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 1977, 8, 1-7.
44. Chen, S.H. Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1985, 17, 113-129.
45. Chang, S.H.;Wen, C.G.; Cheng, Y.L. A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for optimal management of the reservoir watershed. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1997, 99, 289-302.
46. Hong, I.; Vogel, D.R. Data and model management in a generalized mcdm-dss. Decis. Sci. 1991, 22, 1-25.
47. Maniezzo, V.; Mendes, I.; Paruccini, M. Decision support for siting problems. Decis. Support Syst. 1998, 23, 273-284.
48. Haastrup, P.; Maniezzo, V.; Mattarelli, M.; Rinaldi, F.M.; Mendes, I.; Paruccini, M. A decision support system for urban waste management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1998, 109, 330-341.
49. Gershon, M. The role of weights and scales in the application of multi-objective decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1984, 15, 244-250.
50. Lau, P. An Architectural Framework for Construction of a Flexible Expert System for Engineering Selection. Master's Thesis, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada, 1996.
51. Ruan, Y.F.; Liu, Y.F.; Wang, D.; Mou, J. Research on application of fuzzy consistent matrix theory in optimization of foundation design schemes. Ind. Constr. 2008, 38, 636-640.