Optimization methodology of groundwater remediation technologies of contaminated sites in the desert areas by multi-criteria decision analysis

Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 5521-5527

  Zhang, Boqiang ^a,b   An, Da ^a   Wang, Yue ^a   Liang, Huanhuan ^a,c   Zhou, Lian ^a,d   Xi, Beidou ^a   Tang, Jun ^a  

^a CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d CHONGQING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Desert area; Groundwater; Multi criteria decision analysis; Remediation technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992026520     PISSN: 16739108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.201603040     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. HE Yong. The desert is not pollution heaven. Green China, 2014(10): 9 (in Chinese)
2. ZOU Mingying, YUAN Rong, ZHANG Yu. Status of desert pollution and control measures in China. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2015(6): 67-69 (in Chinese)
3. AN Da, JIANG Yonghai, XI Beidou, et al. Analysis for remedial alternatives of unregulated municipal solid waste landfills leachate-contaminated groundwater. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2013, 7(3): 310-319
4. LI Anjie, QUAN Xiangchun, WANG Yan, et al. Selection of contaminated site soil remediation technology based on PROMETHEE II. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2012, 6(10): 3767-3773 (in Chinese)
5. GUITOUNI A., MARTEL J. M. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 109(2): 501-521
6. U. S. EPA. Annual superfund report to congress for fiscal 2004. [2016-03-01]. http://www.epa.gov/oig/report/2005/20050826-EPA-350-R-05.001.pdf
7. LUO Chengzhong, YI Aihua, ZHANG Zengqiang, et al. Remediation technology selection for POPs contaminated sites. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(4): 569-573 (in Chinese)
8. LI Yanping, QIAO Qi, CAI Fahe, et al. Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 27(3): 334-340 (in Chinese)
9. XU Kelong. Risk decision-making method based on ELECTRE. Journal of CTUB (Natural Sciences Edition), 2004, 21(1): 7-10 (in Chinese)
10. WANG Xiaoting, TRIANTAPHYLLOU E. Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 2008, 36(1): 45-63
11. YUAN Xing, WANG Yawei, WEI Yuansong, et al. Optimization of non-point source pollution control measures for Zhong-Xin eco-city in Tianjin based on best management practices. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(11): 4231-4235 (in Chinese)
12. SHEN Lina, LI Guanghe. Groundwater pollution risk mapping method. Environmental Science, 2010, 31(4): 918-923 (in Chinese)
13. YANG Yan, YU Yunjiang, WANG Zongqing, et al. Study on the risk assessment method of regional groundwater pollution. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(2): 653-661 (in Chinese)
14. ZHAO Yongsheng. Risk management and screening of remediation technologies for contaminated groundwater site. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(5): 1426-1433 (in Chinese)
15. TAN Yong. Research PRB design based on numerical simulation and response surface methodology. Changsha: Master Dissertation of Hunan University, 2014 (in Chinese)
16. YANG Mei, FEI Yuhong. Research summary on groundwater pollution remediation technology. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2008(4): 12-16 (in Chinese)
17. KHAN F. I., HUSAIN T., HEJAZI R. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 71(2): 95-122
18. SPIRA Y., HENSTOCK J., NATHANAIL P., et al. A European approach to increase innovative soil and groundwater remediation technology applications. Remediation Journal, 2006, 16(4): 81-96