Comprehending the multiple ‘values’ of green infrastructure – Valuing nature-based solutions for urban water management from multiple perspectives

Environmental Research

Volumn 158, Issue , 2017, Pages 179-187

  Wild, T C ^a   Henneberry, J ^a   Gill, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Sheffield ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economics; Green Infrastructure; Nature based solutions; Urban water; Valuation

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; ETHICS; GREENSPACE; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; POLICY MAKING; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN AREA; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN PLANNING; VALUATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMPIRICISM; NATURAL SCIENCE; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; CITY; CITY PLANNING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMICS; ENGLAND; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WATER SUPPLY;

CITIES; CITY PLANNING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENGLAND; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 85021152162     PISSN: 00139351     EISSN: 10960953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barton, D., 2015. Monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services-operationalization or tragedy of well-intentioned valuation? An illustrated example. In: Nuss-Girona, S., Castañer, M. (Eds.),Ecosystem Services: Concepts, Methodologies and Instruments for Research and Applied Use.
2. Bond, A.J., Morrison-Saunders, A., Sustainability appraisal: jack of all trades, master of none?. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 27:4 (2009), 321–329.
3. BREEAM, 2016. (undated). 〈http://www.breeam.com/why-breeam〉. (Accessed online on 18 November 2016).
4. Briassoulis, H., Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (planner's) glass darkly. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 44:3 (2001), 409–427.
5. Brown, G., Matysiak, G., Real Estate Investment: A Capital Budgeting Approach. 2000, Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow.
6. Burton, M., Rymsa-Fitschen, C., 2008. The ‘Landscape Quality Effect’. In: CSI, 2008. Creating a Setting for Investment Project Report. SYFP, Sheffield. pp. 9–25.
7. Coleman, C., Crosby, N., McAllister, P., Wyatt, P., Development appraisal in practice: some evidence from the planning system. J. Prop. Res. 30:2 (2013), 144–165.
8. Costmodelling, 2016. UK Tender Price and Building Cost Indices. 〈http://www.costmodelling.com/construction-indices〉 (Accessed online 24 November 2016).
9. Crosby, N., McAllister, P., Wyatt, P., Fit for planning? An evaluation of the application of development viability appraisal models in the UK planning system. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 40:1 (2013), 3–22.
10. Davies, C., MacFarlane, R., McGloin, C., Roe, M., Green. Infrastruct. Plan. Guide, v1, 2015, 1.
11. Dickie, I., Natural capital: adding value to urban environments. 〈http://ecosystemsknowledge.net/events/building-prosperous-cities/〉 (Accessed online 14 September 2016).
12. Everard, M., Moggridge, H.L., Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosyst. 15:2 (2012), 293–314.
13. Gill, L., Lange, E., Morgan, E., Romano, D., An analysis of usage of different types of visualisation media within a collaborative planning workshop environment. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 40:4 (2013), 742–754.
14. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N., Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86 (2013), 235–245.
15. Havard, T., Contemporary Property Development. 2nd ed., 2008, RIBA Publishing, London.
16. Henneberry, J., Development viability. Crook, A., Henneberry, J., Whitehead, C., (eds.) Planning Gain: Providing Infrastructure and Affordable Housing, Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, 2016, 115–139.
17. Kallis, G., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Zografos, C., To value or not to value? That is not the question. Ecol. Econ. 94 (2013), 97–105.
18. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives – Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Kumar, V., Roquette, J.R., Lerner, D.N., Integrated modelling for sustainability appraisal for urban River Corridor (re)-development. Procedia Environ. Sci. 13 (2012), 687–697.
20. Liu, S., Hite, D., 2013. Measuring the effect of green space on property value: an application of the hedonic spatial quantile regression. Presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA) Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 3–5 February.
21. McAllister, P., Wyatt, P., Coleman, C., Fit for policy? Some evidence on the application of development viability models in the United Kingdom planning system. Town Plan. Rev. 84:4 (2013), 495–521.
22. Mell, I.C., Keskin, B., Hehl-Lange, S., Henneberry, J., A Contingent Valuation of Green Investments in The Wicker Riverside, Sheffield. (Action 4.2, Level II Report, VALUE Project), 2012, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
23. Mell, I.C., Henneberry, J., Hehl-Lange, S., Keskin, B., Promoting urban greening: valuing the development of green infrastructure investments in the urban core of Manchester, UK. Urban For. Urban Green. 12:3 (2013), 296–306.
24. Mell, I., Henneberry, J., Hehl-Lange, S., Keskin, B., To green or not to green: establishing the economic value of green infrastructure investments in the Wicker, Sheffield. Urban For. Urban Green. 18 (2016), 257–267.
25. Merk, O., Saussier, S., Staropoli, C., Slack, E., Kim, J.H., Financing Green Urban Infrastructure. 2012, OECD Publishing.
26. Mielke, B., 2008. The costs and benefits of landscape quality enhancements on brownfield sites. In: CSI, 2008. Creating a Setting for Investment Project Report. SYFP, Sheffield.
27. Monbiot, G., 2014. We need a new law to protect our wildlife from critical decline. 〈https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2014/nov/21/we-need-nature-wellbeing-act-protect-wildlife-decline〉. (Accessed online 26 September 2016).
28. Nadin, V., Stead, D., European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP – Plann. Rev. 44:172 (2008), 35–47.
29. Nationwide, 2016. Nationwide House Price Index - UK and regional quarterly series by property age group. 〈http://www.nationwide.co.uk/about/house-price-index/download-data#tab:Downloaddata〉. (Accessed online 24 November 2016).
30. Nicholls, S., The impact of greenways on property values: evidence from Austin, Texas. J. Leis. Res. 37:3 (2005), 321–341.
31. ODPM, 2005. Sustainability appraisal of regional spatial strategies and local development documents. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, England.
32. Planning Advisory Service, 2011. Viability handbook and exercises, Local Government Group, London.
33. RICS, 2012. Financial viability in planning, RICS guidance note, 1st ed. (GN94/2012), Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
34. Roberts, C., Rowley, S., Henneberry, J., The impact of landscape quality on property investment decisions. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 30:1 (2012), 69–82.
35. Rosen, S., Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Political Econ. 82:1 (1974), 34–55.
36. Ruelle, C., Halleux, J.M., Teller, J., Landscape quality and brownfield regeneration: a community investigation approach inspired by landscape preference studies. Landsc. Res. 38:1 (2013), 75–99.
37. Saraev, V., Economic Benefits of Greenspace: A Critical Assessment of Evidence of Net Economic Benefits. Forestry Commission Research Report. 2012, Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
38. Shiffer, M.J., Towards a collaborative planning system. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des., 19(6), 1992, 709.
39. Shaw, E., Wild, T.C., Lerner, D.N., ISIS 2D flood modelling of Wicker Riverside. (URSULA Project Report no. 8. ISBN 978-0-9561379-6-8), 2011, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
40. Syms, P., Land, Development and Design. 2nd ed., 2010, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
41. Tosics, I., Sustainable land use in peri-urban areas: government, planning and financial instruments. Nillson, K., et al. (eds.) Peri-urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe., 2013, Springer, Heidelberg, 373–404.
42. UNEP, 2015. Overview of the Milliennium Ecosystem Assessment. 〈http://www.unep.org/maweb/en/about.aspx#2〉. (Accessed online 28 September 2016).
43. Vivid Economics, 2016. The Value of Sheffield's Parks. 〈http://www.vivideconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Briefing-The-value-of-Sheffields-parks.pdf〉 (Accessed online 21 November 2016).
44. Wild, T.C., 2007 (Ed.). Making Places Profitable: Proceedings of the transnational conference on Creating a Setting for Investment. SYFP, Sheffield.
45. Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D., Assessing the value of future landscapes. Landsc. and Urban Plan. 23 (1992), 17–32.
46. Wilker, J., Rusche, K., Economic valuation as a tool to support decision-making in strategic green infrastructure planning?. Local Environ. 19:6 (2013), 702–713.
47. Wyatt, P., Property Valuation in an Economic Context. 2007, Blackwell, Oxford.