Landscape Quality and Brownfield Regeneration: A Community Investigation Approach Inspired by Landscape Preference Studies

Landscape Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 75-99

  Ruelle, Christine ^a   Halleux, Jean Marie ^a   Teller, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Brownfield regeneration; landscape preferences; landscape quality; local community; post industrial landscapes

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; ESTHETICS; LANDSCAPE; NEIGHBORHOOD; URBAN RENEWAL;

BELGIUM; WALLONIA;

EID: 84876513540     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2011.647898     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Burton, M. and Rymsa-Fitschen, C. 2008. " The 'landscape quality effect' ". In Creating a Setting for Investment-Project ReportEdited by: CSI Project Team. 9-25. available at http://www.environment-investment.com/images/downloads/final_report.pdf (accessed 18 December 2009)
2. Cabernet Coordination Team. 2006. " Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report ". available at http://www.cabernet.org.uk/ (accessed 8 December 2008)
3. Cheng, A. C., Kruger, L. and Daniels, S. 2003. Place as an interesting concept in natural resource politics. Society and Natural Resources, 16 (2): 87-104.
4. Chon, J. and Shafer, C. S. 2009. Aesthetic responses to urban greenway trail environments. Landscape Research, 34 (1): 83-104.
5. Coeterier, J. F. 1996. Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34: 27-44.
6. Collier, M. J. and Scott, M. J. 2008. Industrially harvested peatlands and after-use potential: Understanding local stakeholder narratives and landscape preferences. Landscape Research, 33 (4): 439-460.
7. COE. 2000. " European Landscape Convention, Council of Europe ". available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed 3 March 2011)
8. Daniel, T. C. 2001. Wither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54: 267-281.
9. Dixon, T. 2007. The property development industry and sustainable urban brownfield regeneration in England: An analysis of case studies in Thames Gateway and Greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 44 (12): 2379-2400.
10. Ellis, C. D., Lee, S. W. and Kweon, B. S. 2006. Retail land use, neighbourhood satisfaction and the urban forest: An investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74 (1): 70-78.
11. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2): 219-245.
12. Franz, M., Güles, O. and Prey, G. 2008. Place making and 'green' reuses of brownfields in the Ruhr. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 99 (3): 316-328.
13. Fraser, C. and Marechal, L. 2003. " Belgium: The case of Wallonie ". In Urban Regeneration in Europe, Edited by: Couch, C., Fraser, C. and Percy, S. 126-134. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
14. Galindo, M. P. and Rodriguez, J. A. C. 2000. Environmental aesthetics and psychological wellbeing: Relationships between preference judgements for urban landscapes and other relevant affective responses. Psychology in Spain, 4 (1): 13-27.
15. Halleux, J.-M. 2005. " Valuing green structures. The use of hedonic models to assess the influence of green structure on residential property prices, in: A.C. Werquin, B. Duhem, G. Lindholm, B. Oppermann, S. Pauleit & S. Tjallingi (Eds) Green Structure and Urban Planning, pp. 267-273 (European Science Foundation). http://hdl.handle.net/2268/62472".
16. Halleux, J.-M. and Lambotte, J.-M. 2008. Reconstruire la ville sur la ville. Le recyclage et le renouvellement des espaces dégradés. Territoire(s) wallon(s), 2: 7-22. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/62557
17. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice, London: Routledge.
18. Henneberry, J. and Halleux, J.-M. 2008. " Effects of landscape quality on property and land values ". In Creating a Setting for Investment - Project ReportEdited by: CSI Project Team. Available at www.environment-investment.com/ (accessed 25 May 2010)
19. Hitchmough, J. D. and Bonugli, A. M. 1997. Attitudes of residents of a medium sized town in south west Scotland to street trees. Landscape Research, 22 (3): 327-337.
20. Holden, R. 1995. Post-industrial landscapes: London and the aesthetics of current British urban planning. Built Environment, 21 (1): 35-44.
21. Kaltenborn, B. P. and Bjerke, T. 2002. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59: 1-11.
22. Kaplan, R. and Austin, M. E. 2004. Out in the country: Sprawl and the quest for nature nearby. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69: 235-243.
23. Karjalainen, E. 2006. " The visual preferences for forest regeneration and field afforestation-four case studies in Finland ". Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Biosciences, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Finnish Forest Research Institute, December, available at http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/bio/bioja/vk/karjalainen2/ (accessed 14 February 2010)
24. Lafortezza, R., Corry, R. C., Senesi, G. and Brown, R. D. 2008. Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations. Journal of Environmental Management, 89: 257-269.
25. Lee, S.-W., Ellis, C. D., Kweon, B.-S. and Hong, S.-K. 2008. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85: 60-70.
26. Letombe, G. and Zuindeau, B. 2001. L'impact des friches industrielles sur les valeurs immobilières: une application de la méthode des prix hédoniques à l'arrondissement de Lens (Nord - Pas de Calais). Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, 4: 605-624.
27. Lilford, R. J. and Braunholtz, D. 2003. Reconciling the quantitative and qualitative traditions - the Bayesian approach. Public Money & Management, 23 (3): 203-208.
28. Ling, C., Handley, J. and Rodwell, J. 2007. Restructuring the post-industrial landscape: A multifunctional approach. Landscape Research, 32 (3): 285-309.
29. Maginn, P. J. 2007. Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 7 (1): 25-43.
30. Miles, S. 2005. 'Our Tyne': Iconic regeneration and the revitalisation of identity in Newcastle Gateshead. Urban Studies, 42 (5/6): 913-926.
31. Mudrak, L. Y. 1983. Urban residents' landscape preferences: A method for their assessment. Urban Ecology, 7 (2): 91-123.
32. Murtagh, B. 1999. Listening to communities: Locality research and planning. Urban Studies, 36: 1181-1193.
33. Orueta, F. D. 2007. Madrid: Urban regeneration projects and social mobilization. Cities, 24 (3): 183-193.
34. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. 1982. A public preference evaluation of landscape quality. Regional Studies, 16 (2): 97-112.
35. Podmore, J. 1998. (Re)reading the 'loft living' habitus in Montréal's inner city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22 (2): 283-302.
36. Roovers, P., Hermy, M. and Gulinck, H. 2002. Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59 (3): 129-145.
37. Ruddell, E. J., Gramann, J. H., Rudis, V. A. and Westphal, J. M. 1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near view forest scenic-beauty models. Environment and Behavior, 21 (4): 393-412.
38. Sevenant, M. and Antrop, M. 2009. Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (9): 2889-2899.
39. Sharp, J., Pollock, V. and Paddison, R. 2005. Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42 (5/6): 1001-1023.
40. Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, London: Routledge.
41. Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42. Stedman, R. 2003. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 16 (8): 671-685.
43. Sullivan, W. C. and Lovell, S. T. 2006. Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural-urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77 (1-2): 152-166.
44. Surova, D. and Pinto-Correia, T. 2008. Landscape preferences in the cork oak Montado region of Alentejo, southern Portugal: Searching for valuable landscape characteristics for different user groups. Landscape Research, 33 (3): 311-330.
45. Teller, J. 2007. Etudes de cas comparatives et bonnes pratiques, in: LAUA (Eds) Formes et pratiques de l'activité de recherche. Lieux communs, 10: 93-116.
46. Tjallingii, S. 2005. " Green structure and urban planning, general outcomes of Cost C11 ". In Green Structure and Urban Planning, Edited by: Werquin, A. C., Duhem, B., Lindholm, G., Oppermann, B., Pauleit, S. and Tjallingi, S. 15-37. Brussels: COST Action C11, European Science Foundation.
47. Tress, B., Tress, G., Decamps, H. and d'Hauteserre, A. M. 2001. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57: 137-141.
48. Tweed, C. and Sutherland, M. 2007. Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83 (3): 62-69.
49. Vileniske, I. G. 2008. Influence of built heritage on sustainable development of landscape. Landscape Research, 33 (4): 425-437.
50. Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. (1st edn: 1984)