What are the benefits of strictly protected nature reserves? Rapid assessment of ecosystem service values in Wanglang Nature Reserve, China

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 26, Issue , 2017, Pages 70-78

  Liu, Peng ^a   Jiang, Shiwei ^b   Zhao, Lianjun ^b   Li, Yunxi ^b   Zhang, Pingping ^c   Zhang, Li ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Long'an Town   (China)

^c NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Beneficiaries; Conservation; Ecosystem services; Natural Forest Protection Project; Nature reserve; TESSA

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021119616     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agarwala, M., Kumar, S., Treves, A., Naughton-Treves, L., Paying for wolves in Solapur, India and Wisconsin, USA: comparing compensation rules and practice to understand the goals and politics of wolf conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143 (2010), 2945–2955.
2. Anderson-Teixeira, K.J., DeLucia, E.H., The greenhouse gas value of ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 17 (2011), 425–438.
3. Bagstad, K.J., Semmens, D.J., Waage, S., Winthrop, R., A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2013), 27–39.
4. Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., et al. Ecology – Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297 (2002), 950–953.
5. Balmford, A., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., et al. Bringing ecosystem services into the real world: an operational framework for assessing the economic consequences of losing wild nature. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48 (2011), 161–175.
6. Bao, Y., Wu, W., Wang, M., Liu, W., Disadvantages and future research directions in valuation of ecosystem services in China. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 14 (2007), 372–381.
7. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A.R., Mace, G.M., et al. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341 (2013), 45–50.
8. Bernard, F., de Groot, R.S., Campos, J.J., Valuation of tropical forest services and mechanisms to finance their conservation and sustainable use: a case study of Tapanti National Park, Costa Rica. Forest Policy Econ. 11 (2009), 174–183.
9. Birch, J.C., Thapa, I., Balmford, A., et al. What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal. Ecosyst. Serv. 8 (2014), 118–127.
10. Blaen, P.J., Jia, L., Peh, K.S.H., et al. Rapid assessment of ecosystem services provided by two mineral extraction sites restored for nature conservation in an agricultural landscape in Eastern England. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0121010.
11. Cai, H.S., Zhang, X.L., Zhu, D.H., Study of ecological capacity change and quantitative analysis of ecological compensation in a nature reserve based on RS and GIS: A case study on Po-yang Lake Nature Reserve China. N. Zealand J. Agric. Res. 50 (2007), 757–766.
12. Chen, X., Lupi, F., Viña, A., He, G., Liu, J., Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services. Conserv. Biol. 24 (2010), 1469–1478.
13. Costanza, R., dArge, R., deGroot, R., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997), 253–260.
14. Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Ervin, D. et al., (2010) Valuing ecological systems and services. F1000 Biology Reports 3.
15. Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., et al. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 21–28.
16. de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., Boumans, R.M.J., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41 (2002), 393–408.
17. Doxa, A., Bas, Y., Paracchini, M.L., Pointereau, P., Terres, J.-M., Jiguet, F., Low-intensity agriculture increases farmland bird abundances in France. J. Appl. Ecol. 47 (2010), 1348–1356.
18. Guan, T., Wang, F., Li, S., McShea, W.J., Nature reserve requirements for landscape-dependent ungulates: the case of endangered takin (Budorcas taxicolor) in Southwestern China. Biol. Conserv. 182 (2015), 63–71.
19. Hanson, C., Finisdore, J., Ranganathan, J., 2012. The corporate ecosystem services review: guidelines for identifying business risks & opportunities arising from ecosystem change. World Resources Institute.
20. IPCC, 2006. IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan.
21. Koenig, H.J., Multifunctional forest management in Guyuan: potentials, challenges and trade-offs. J. Resour. Ecol. 1 (2010), 300–310.
22. Kremen, C., Ostfeld, R.S., A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3 (2005), 540–548.
23. Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Dorji, L., Thoennes, P., Tshering, K., An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan. Ecosyst. Serv. 3 (2013), e11–e21.
24. Liang, Y., Xiang, Y., Takeuchi, K. (2013) Harnessing the ecosystem services for local livelihoods: The case of the tea forests in Yunnan, China. TEEB case. Available from: < http://www.teebweb.org/>.
25. Lin, Z., Dai, F., Sonnenfeld, D.A., Resolving Forest Property Rights Disputes in China: the Bailian case. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 29 (2012), 227–231.
26. MA, Living beyong our means: natural assets and human well-being. 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, United Nations.
27. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B., Alkemade, R., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 (2012), 1–12.
28. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 9495–9500.
29. Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 (2009), 4–11.
30. Peh, K.S.H., Balmford, A., Bradbury, R.B., et al. TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosyst. Serv. 5 (2013), 51–57.
31. Peh, K.H., Balmford, A., Birch, J., et al. Potential impact of invasive alien species on ecosystem services provided by a tropical forested ecosystem: a case study from Montserrat. Biol. Invasions, 2014, 1–15.
32. Peh, K.S.H., Balmford, A., Field, R.H., et al. Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a UK wetland. Ecol. Evol. 4 (2014), 3875–3886.
33. Penman, J., Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., et al. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 35 (2003), 103–105.
34. Qiao, X., Xiao, W.Y., Tang, Y., Jaffe, D., Jiang, L.J., Contributions of local tourism and regional air pollution to atmospheric aerosols in Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan, China. China Environ. Sci. 34 (2014), 14–21.
35. Raymond, C.M., Bryan, B.A., Macdonald, D.H., et al. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 1301–1315.
36. Schroter, D., Cramer, W., Leemans, R., et al. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310 (2005), 1333–1337.
37. Srinivasan, U.T., Carey, S.P., Hallstein, E., et al. The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 1768–1773.
38. TEEB, TEEB for Local and Regional Policy Makers. Available from: http://www.teebweb.org/, 2010.
39. Thapa, I., Butchart, S.H.M., Gurung, H., Stattersfield, A.J., Thomas, D.H.L., Birch, J.C., Using information on ecosystem services in Nepal to inform biodiversity conservation and local to national decision-making. Oryx FirstView, 2014, 1–9.
40. Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005), 857–874.
41. Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol. Econ. 46 (2003), 493–510.
42. Wan, P., Cui, C., Wang, C., Dong, F., Hu, L.I., Wen, L.I., An Unexploited Scenic Spot of Jiuzaigou Circular Tour Area –The Tourism Resources of Ecology and Qiang Nationality Culture and Its Development in Yanmengou Area, Wenchuan County. J. Sichuan Normal Univ. 25 (2002), 212–215.
43. World Bank Group and ECOFYS, 2016. Carbon Pricing Watch 2016. World Bank Other Operational Studies. World Bank Group, ECOFYS.
44. Xie, G., Lu, C., Leng, Y., Zheng, D., Li, S., Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J. Nat. Res. 18 (2003), 189–196.
45. Yang, B., Busch, J., Zhang, L., et al. China's Collective Forest Tenure Reform and the Future of the Giant Panda. Conserv. Lett. 8 (2014), 251–261.
46. Zhang, L., Balancing conservation and development to preserve China's biodiversity. Conserv. Biol., 29, 2015 1496-1496.
47. Zhang, J.H., Zhang, J., Liang, Y.L., et al. An Analysis of Touristic Ecological Footprint and Eco compensation of Jiuzhaigou in 2002. J. Nat. Res. 20 (2005), 735–744.
48. Zhu, L., Hu, Y., Zhang, Z., Wei, F., Effect of China's rapid development on its iconic giant panda. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58 (2013), 2134–2139.