Policy lessons from health taxes: A systematic review of empirical studies

BMC Public Health

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Wright, Alexandra ^a   Smith, Katherine E ^a   Hellowell, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Fat tax; Hypothecation earmarking; Public health; Sin taxes; Soda tax; Sugar tax; Systematic review; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

SWEETENING AGENT;

BEVERAGE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ECONOMICS; FOOD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; POLICY; POLITICS; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC HEALTH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TAX;

BEVERAGES; COMMERCE; FOOD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SWEETENING AGENTS; TAXES;

EID: 85020920866     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Sassi F, Belloni A, Capobianco C. The role of fiscal policies in health promotion [Internet]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2013. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5k3twr94kvzx-en
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention volume 14: tobacco control: effectiveness of tax and price policies for tobacco control. Lyon: World Health Organization; 2011.
3. Wagenaar AC, Salois MJ, Komro KA. Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2009;104:179-90.
4. Hellowell M, Smith KE, Wright A. Hard to avoid but difficult to sustain: Scotland's innovative health tax on large retailers selling tobacco and alcohol. Milbank Q. 2016;94:800-31.
5. Barroy H, Sparkles S, Dale E. Assessing fiscal space for health expansion in low-and-middle income countries: a review of the evidence [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Report No.: No 3. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/251904/1/WHO-HIS-HGF-HFWorkingPaper-16.3-eng.pdf?ua=1
6. Stewart E, Smith KE. "Black magic" and "gold dust": the epistemic and political uses of evidence tools in public health policy making. Evid Policy J Res Debate Pract. 2015;11:415-37.
7. Gortmaker SL, Long MW, Resch SC, Ward ZJ, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, et al. Cost effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions: evidence and methods for CHOICES. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:102-11.
8. Zhang D, Giabbanelli PJ, Arah OA, Zimmerman FJ. Impact of different policies on unhealthy dietary behaviors in an urban adult population: an agent-based simulation model. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:1217-22.
9. Colantuoni F, Rojas C. The impact of soda sales taxes on consumption: evidence from scanner data. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33:714-34.
10. Elder RW, Lawrence B, Ferguson A, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Chattopadhyay SK, et al. The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:217-29.
11. Wagenaar AC, Tobler AL, Komro KA. Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2270-8.
12. Smith KE, Savell E, Gilmore AB. What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies. Tob Control. 2012;22:144-53.
13. Mytton OT, Clarke D, Rayner M. Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health. BMJ. 2012;344:e2931.
14. Epstein LH, Finkelstein E, Raynor H, Nederkoorn C, Fletcher KD, Jankowiak N, et al. Experimental analysis of the effect of taxes and subsides on calories purchased in an on-line supermarket. Appetite. 2015;95:245-51.
15. Bíró A. Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier? Food Policy. 2015;54:107-15.
16. Dharmasena S, Capps O. Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the U.S. obesity problem. Health Econ. 2012;21:669-94.
17. Fletcher JM, Frisvold DE, Tefft N. Non-linear effects of soda taxes on consumption and weight outcomes. Health Econ. 2015;24:566-82.
18. Etilé F, Sharma A. Do high consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages respond differently to price changes? A finite mixture IV-Tobit approach. Health Econ. 2015;24:1147-63.
19. Miao Z, Beghin J, Jensen H. Taxing sweets: sweetener input tax or final consumption tax? Contemp Econ Policy. 2012;30:344-61.
20. Mytton O, Gray A, Rayner M, Rutter H. Could targeted food taxes improve health? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:689-94.
21. Ford CN, Ng SW, Popkin BM. Targeted beverage taxes influence food and beverage purchases among households with preschool children. J Nutr. 2015;145:1835-43.
22. Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S, Stuckler D, Popkin B, Ebrahim S. Averting obesity and type 2 diabetes in India through sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an economic-epidemiologic modeling study. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001582.
23. Briggs ADM, Mytton OT, Kehlbacher A, Tiffin R, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6189.
24. Bodker M, Pisinger C, Toft U, Jorgensen T. The rise and fall of the world's first fat tax. Health Policy. 2015;119:737-42.
25. Fletcher JM, Frisvold D, Tefft N. Can soft drink taxes reduce population weight? Contemp Econ Policy. 2010;28:23-35.
26. Smed S, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Jensen JD. The effects of the Danish saturated fat tax on food and nutrient intake and modelled health outcomes: an econometric and comparative risk assessment evaluation. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70:681-6.
27. Wang Y. The potential impact of sweetened beverage taxes in New York state: a report to the NYC Department of Mental Health & Hygiene [Internet]. New York: Columbia University; 2010. Available from: http://www.columbia.edu/~ycw2102/SSB%20tax%20brief%20Wang%202010%2006%2021%20-Final-.pdf
28. Kim D, Kawachi I. Food taxation and pricing strategies to "thin out" the obesity epidemic. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30:430-7.
29. Fletcher JM, Frisvold D, Tefft N. Taxing soft drinks and restricting access to vending machines to curb child obesity. Health Aff Proj Hope. 2010;29:1059-66.
30. Fletcher JM, Frisvold DE, Tefft N. The effects of soft drink taxes on child and adolescent consumption and weight outcomes. J Public Econ. 2010;94:967-74.
31. Powell LM, Chriqui J, Chaloupka FJ. Associations between state-level soda taxes and adolescent body mass index. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2009;45:S57-63.
32. Sturm R, Powell LM, Chriqui JF, Chaloupka FJ. Soda taxes, soft drink consumption, and Children's body mass index. Health Aff Proj Hope. 2010;29:1052-8.
33. Allais O. Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: an empirical evaluation of fat policies. J Health Econ. 2015;43:27-44.
34. Epstein LH, Dearing KK, Roba LG, Finkelstein E. The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psychol Sci [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Jun 27]; Available from: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/02/04/0956797610361446
35. Nnoaham KE, Sacks G, Rayner M, Mytton O, Gray A. Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1324-33.
36. Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Orton L, Hawkes C, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, et al. Smorgasbord or symphony? Assessing public health nutrition policies across 30 European countries using a novel framework. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1195.
37. Central Bank of Barbados. Barbados' tax on sugar-sweetened beverages is a step in the right direction [Internet]. Bridgetown: Central Bank of Barbados; 2016. Available from: http://www.centralbank.org.bb/news/article/9031/barbados-tax-on-sugar-sweetened-beverages-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction
38. Sanger-Katz M. Soda tax passes in Philadelphia. Advocates ask: Who's next? N Y Times [Internet]. 2016; Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/17/upshot/soda-tax-passes-in-philadelphia-advocates-ask-whos-next.html?-r=1
39. Thow AM, Quested C, Juventin L, Kun R, Khan AN, Swinburn B. Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific: implementation lessons for improving health. Health Promot Int. 2011;26:55-64.
40. Chriqui J, Eidson S, Chaloupka F. State sales taxes on regular Sodea (as of January 2014) - BTG fact sheet. Chicago: Bridging the Gap Program, Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2014.
41. Carriedo A, Lock K, Knai C, Hawkins B. A qualitative analysis of the design and implementation of the soda tax in Mexico. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25:ckv175.241.
42. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;352:h6704.
43. Gustavsen GW, Rickertsen K. Adjusting VAT rates to promote healthier diets in Norway: a censored quantile regression approach. Food Policy. 2013;42:88-95.
44. Harkanen T, Kotakorpi K, Pietinen P, Pirttila J, Reinivuo H, Suoniemi I. The welfare effects of health-based food tax policy. Food Policy. 2014;49:196-206.
45. Nordström J, Thunström L. Can targeted food taxes and subsidies improve the diet? Distributional effects among income groups. Food Policy. 2011;36:259-71.
46. Ni Mhurchu C, Eyles H, Genc M, Scarborough P, Rayner M, Mizdrak A, et al. Effects of health-related food taxes and subsidies on mortality from diet-related disease in New Zealand: an econometric-epidemiologic modelling study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128477.
47. Long MW, Gortmaker SL, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Moodie ML, Sacks G, et al. Cost effectiveness of a sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:112-23.
48. Smed S, Jensen J, Denver S. Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument. Food Policy. 2007;32:624-39.
49. Wada R, Han E, Powell LM. Associations between soda prices and intake: evidence from 24-h dietary recall data. Food Policy. 2015;55:54-60.
50. Wang YC, Coxson P, Shen Y-M, Goldman L, Bibbins-Domingo K. A penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would cut health and cost burdens of diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:199-207.
51. Sacks G, Veerman JL, Moodie M, Swinburn B. "traffic-light" nutrition labelling and "junk-food" tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes. 2011;35:1001-9.
52. Sharma A, Hauck K, Hollingsworth B, Siciliani L. The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages across different income groups. Health Econ. 2014;23:1159-84.
53. Tiffin R, Kehlbacher A, Salois M. The effects of a soft drink tax in the UK. Health Econ. 2015;24:583-600.
54. Wang EY. The impact of soda taxes on consumer welfare: implications of storability and taste heterogeneity. RAND J Econ. 2015;46:409-41.
55. Zhen C, Finkelstein EA, Nonnemaker JM, Karns SA, Todd JE. Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system. Am J Agric Econ. 2014;96:1-25.
56. Zhen C, Wohlgenant MK, Karns S, Kaufman P. Habit formation and demand for sugar-sweetened beverages. Am J Agric Econ. 2011;93:175-93.
57. Alagiyawanna A, Townsend N, Mytton O, Scarborough P, Roberts N, Rayner M. Studying the consumption and health outcomes of fiscal interventions (taxes and subsidies) on food and beverages in countries of different income classifications; a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:887.
58. ECORYS. Food taxes and their impact on competitiveness in the agri-food sector: final report. ECORYS: Rotterdam; 2014.
59. Chouinard HH, Davis DE, LaFrance JT, Perloff JM. Fat taxes: big money for small change. Forum Health Econ Policy [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2016 Mar 21];10. Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/fhep.2007.10.2/fhep.2007.10.2.1071/fhep.2007.10.2.1071.xml
60. Barry C, Niederdeppe J, Gollust S. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:158-63.
61. Beeken R, Wardle J. Public beliefs about the causes of obesity and attitudes towards policy initiatives in Great Britain. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16:2132-7.
62. González-Zapata LI, Alvarez-Dardet C, Millstone E, Clemente-Gómez V, Holdsworth M, Ortiz-Moncada R, et al. The potential role of taxes and subsidies on food in the prevention of obesity in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:696-704.
63. Morley B, Martin J, Niven P, Wakefield M. Public opinion of food-related obesity prevention policy initiatives. Health Promot J Austr. 2012;23:86-91.
64. Donaldson EA, Cohen JE, Rutkow L, Villanti AC, Kanarek NF, Barry CL. Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2263-73.
65. Moretto N, Kendall E, Whitty J, Byrnes J, Hills AP, Gordon L, et al. Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:2456-71.
66. Vallgårda S, Holm L, Jensen JD. The Danish tax on saturated fat: why it did not survive. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69:223-6.
67. Donaldson E. Advocating for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: a case study of Mexico [Internet]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 2015. Available from: http://www.jhsph.edu/departments/health-behavior-and-society/-pdf/Advocating-For-Sugar-Sweetened-Beverage-Taxation.pdf
68. Nixon L, Majia P, Cheyne A, Dorfman L. Big Soda's long shadow: news coverage of local proposals to tax sugar-sweetened beverages in Richmond, El Monte and Telluride. Crit Public Health. 2015;25:333-47.
69. Isett KR, Laugesen MJ, Cloud DH. Learning from New York City: a case study of public health policy practice in the Bloomberg administration. J Public Health Manag Pract JPHMP. 2015;21:313-22.
70. Shill J, Mavoa H, Allender S, Lawrence M, Sacks G, Peeters A, et al. Government regulation to promote healthy food environments - a view from inside state governments. Obes Rev. 2012;13:162-73.
71. Allais O, Bertail P, Nichle V. The effects of a fat tax on French households' purchases: a nutritional approach. Am J Agric Econ. 2010;92:228-45.
72. Madden D. The poverty effects of a "fat-tax" in Ireland. Health Econ. 2015;24:104-21.
73. Hoffman SJ, Tan C. Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:744.
74. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control. 2012;21:172-80.
75. Stenberg K, Elovainio R, Chisholm D, Fuhr D, Perucic A-M, Rekve D, et al. Responding to the challenge of resource mobilization - mechanisms for raising additional domestic resources for health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/13Innovativedomfinancing.pdf
76. Vardavas CI, Filippidis FT, Agaku I, Mytaras V, Bertic M, Connolly GN, et al. Tobacco taxation: the importance of earmarking the revenue to health care and tobacco control. Tob Induc Dis. 2012;10:21.
77. Vandenberg B, Sharma A. Are alcohol taxation and pricing policies regressive? Product-level effects of a specific tax and a minimum unit price for alcohol. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016;51:493-502.
78. Hill S, Amos A, Clifford D, Platt S. Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence. Tob Control. 2014;23:e89-97.
79. International Monetary Fund. Revenue mobilization in developing countries [Internet]. Washington: International Monetary Fund; 2011. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2011/030811.pdf
80. Julia C, Méjean C, Vicari F, Péneau S, Hercberg S. Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2679-88.
81. Somerville C, Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL, Cohn S. Public attitudes towards pricing policies to change health-related behaviours: a UK focus group study. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25:1058-64.