Big Soda’s long shadow: news coverage of local proposals to tax sugar-sweetened beverages in Richmond, El Monte and Telluride

Critical Public Health

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 333-347

  Nixon, Laura ^a   Mejia, Pamela ^a   Cheyne, Andrew ^a   Dorfman, Lori ^a  

^a Berkeley Media Studies Group   (United States)

Author keywords

media; newspapers; obesity; soda tax; sugary drink

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CARBONATE;

ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; CHILD HEALTH; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ETHNOGRAPHY; FOOD INDUSTRY; LEGAL ASPECT; MASS COMMUNICATION; MASS MEDIUM; NEWS COVERAGE; POLICY; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SODA INDUSTRY; SUGARY DRINK; TAX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925149086     PISSN: 09581596     EISSN: 14693682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2014.987729     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Adams, S. (2013, October 16). Sugary beverage tax strikes a nerve. The Watch.
2. Allen, S. (2012, October 29). Ad blitz aims to drown soda tax: El Monte mayor saw measure as a slam dunk. Then the drink makers declared war. Los Angeles Times.
3. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Reflections: ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10, 65–77. doi:10.1007/bf0098826910.1007/BF00988269
4. American Beverage Association. (2012, September 18). A tale of two politicians. Sip and Savor Blog.
5. American Heart Association. (2013). Decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: Policy approaches to address obesity. Retrieved March 14, 2014, from http://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@adv/documents/downloadable/ucm_453908.pdf
6. Andreyeva, T., Chaloupka, F. J., & Brownell, K. D. (2011). Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue. Preventive Medicine, 52, 413–416. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.01310.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.013
7. Andreyeva, T, Long, M. W., & Brownell, K. D. (2010). The impact of food prices on consumption: A systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 216–222.10.2105/AJPH.2008.151415
8. Apollonio, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (2007a). Industry front groups: A tobacco case study. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 2, 341–348.
9. Apollonio, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (2007b). The creation of industry front groups: The tobacco industry and “get government off our back”. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 419–427.10.2105/AJPH.2005.081117
10. Ballesteros-Coronel, M. (2012, October 10). Empresarios de El Monte se oponen a Medida H. [El Monte businesspeople oppose Measure H]. El Mensajero.
11. Basen-Engquist, K., & Chang, M. (2011). Obesity and cancer risk: Recent review and evidence. Current Oncology Reports, 13, 71–76.10.1007/s11912-010-0139-7
12. Berkeley Media Studies Group. (2014). Building capacity to make the case for healthier beverage environments. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.bmsg.org/about/projects/building-capacity-to-make-the-case-for-healthier-beverage-environments
13. Brownell, K. D. (2012). Thinking forward: The quicksand of appeasing the food industry. PLoS Medicine, 9(7), doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001254
14. Brownell, K. D., Farley, T., Willett, W. C., Popkin, B. M., Chaloupka, F. J., Thompson, J. W., & Ludwig, D. S. (2009). The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1599–1605. doi:10.1056/NEJMhpr090572310.1056/NEJMhpr0905723
15. Brownell, K. D., & Frieden, T. R. (2009). Ounces of prevention – The public policy case for taxes on sugared beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1805–1808. doi:10.1056/NEJMp090239210.1056/NEJMp0902392
16. Brownell, K. D., Kersh, R., Ludwig, D. S., Post, R. C., Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Willett, W. C. (2010). Personal responsibility and obesity: A constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Affairs, 29, 379–387. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.073910.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739
17. Brownell, K. D., & Warner, K. E. (2009). The perils of ignoring history: Big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Quarterly, 87, 259–294.10.1111/milq.2009.87.issue-1
18. California Center for Public Health Advocacy. (2011). Soda industry ups political spending to fight proposed sugary drink taxes. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.kickthecan.info/soda-industry-political-spending
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). State tobacco activities tracking and evaluation (STATE) system. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/statesystem
20. Chaloupka, F. J., & Davidson, P. A. (2010). Applying tobacco control lessons to obesity: Taxes and other pricing strategies to reduce consumption. Retrieved from http://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/tclc-syn-obesity-2010.pdf
21. Chaloupka, F. J., Powell, L. M., & Chriqui, J. F. (2011). Sugar-sweetened beverage taxation as public health policy-lessons from tobacco. Choices, 26(3).
22. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Dorfman, L., Cheyne, A., Friedman, L. C., Wadud, A., & Gottlieb, M. (2012). Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: How do they compare? PLoS Medicine, 9(6).
24. Drange, M. (2012, November 2). Soda industry pours millions into campaign to defeat Richmond soda tax. The Bay Citizen.
25. Flores, G. (2010). Racial and ethnic disparities in the health and health care of children. Pediatrics, 125, e979–e1020.10.1542/peds.2010-0188
26. Friedman, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2012). Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: An updated policy brief. Yale Rudd Center. Retrieved March 14, 2014, from http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/reports/Rudd_Policy_Brief_Sugar_Sweetened_Beverage_Taxes.pdf
27. Glantz, S. A., & Balbach, E. D. (2000). Tobacco war: Inside the California battles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Grier, S. A., & Kumanyika, S. K. (2008). The context for choice: Health implications of targeted food and beverage marketing to African Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1616–1629. doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.11562610.2105/AJPH.2007.115626
29. Grynbaum, M. M. (2012, July 1). Soda makers begin their push against New York ban. New York Times.
30. Han, E., & Powell, L. M. (2013). Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113, 43–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.01610.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016
31. Harnish, B. (2013, October 11). Stranger in town: The sugar tax. Telluride Daily Planet.
32. Harris, J. L., Schwartz, M. B., Brownell, K. D., Javadizadeh, J., Weinberg, M., Sarda, V., … Mejia, P. (2011). Sugary drink FACTS: Evaluating sugary drink nutrition and marketing to youth. New Haven, CT. Retrieved from http://www.sugarydrinkfacts.org/resources/SugaryDrinkFACTS_Report.pdf
33. Huff, B. (2013, October 20). Telluride mom for 2A. Telluride Daily Planet.
34. Hughes, M. (2013, October 30). Yes on 2A. Telluride Daily Planet.
35. Jonassen, W. (2013, January 23). Race-baiting in Richmond. East Bay Express.
36. Jou, J., Niederdeppe, J., Barry, C. L., & Gollust, S. E. (2014). Strategic messaging to promote taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: Lessons from recent political campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 847–853. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301679
37. Kenyon, A. (2011, December 13). Richmond moves forward with Soda Tax. The Bay Citizen.
38. Kit, B. K., Fakhouri, T. H. I., Park, S., Nielsen, S. J., & Ogden, C. L. (2013). Trends in sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth and adults in the United States: 1999–2010. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98, 180–188. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.05794310.3945/ajcn.112.057943
39. Klingsporn, K. (2013, October 13). Sugar, obesity and the role of government. Telluride Daily Planet.
40. Knobel, L. (2014, February 12). Will Berkeley be first in nation to impose soda tax? BerkeleySide.
41. Krippendorff, K. (2009). The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Kumanyika, S., Grier, S. A., Lancaster, K., & Lassiter, V. (2011). Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on Black Americans’ health. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.aacorn.org/uploads/files/AACORNSSBBrief2011.pdf
43. Lee, C. (2012, November 4). Study: Soda tax would boost health of Latinos, blacks. The Bay Citizen.
44. Lundeen, P. (2013, June 30). Education, not taxes. Telluride Daily Planet.
45. Lynch, D. (2013, October 20). The Telluride beverage tax isn’t the answer. Telluride Daily Planet.
46. McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2009). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
47. Mejia, P., Nixon, L., Cheyne, A., Dorfman, L., & Quintero, F. (2014). Issue 21: Two communities, two debates: News coverage of soda tax proposals in Richmond and El Monte. Berkeley, CA. Retrieved August 28, 2014, from http://www.bmsg.org/sites/default/files/bmsg_issue21_sodataxnews.pdf
48. Menashe, C. L. (1998). The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues-United States, 1985-1996. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 307–325. doi:10.1080/108107398127139.10.1080/108107398127139
49. Miller, E. (2013, February 7). Soda tax discussed by lawmakers. Hawaii Tribune Herald.
50. Newspaper Association of America. (2012, February 15). Newspaper readers vote, and voters read newspapers.
51. Niederdeppe, J., Gollust, S. E., Jarlenski, M. P., Nathanson, A. M., & Barry, C. L. (2013). News coverage of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Pro- and antitax arguments in public discourse. American Journal of Public Health, 103, e92–e98. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.30102310.2105/AJPH.2012.301023
52. Oatman, M. (2012, November 7). The Soda Tax Lost. Now What? Mother Jones.
53. Ogden, C. L., Kit, B. K., Carroll, M. D., & Park, S. (2011). NCHS data brief: Consumption of sugar drinks in the United States, 2005–2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 14, 2014, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db71.htm
54. Onshi, N. (2012). California city savors role in fighting “Big Soda”. New York Times.
55. Ottier, M. (2014, February 18). Illinois “soda tax” proposal. KWQC Local News.
56. Overall, E. M., & Taddonio, B. (2013, July 31). The sugary drink tax explained. Telluride Daily Planet.
57. Pamer, M., & Lopez, L. (2012, July 24). El Monte declares fiscal emergency, can put soda tax on November ballot. NBC 4: Southern California.
58. Piernas, C., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. (2013). Trends in purchases and intake of foods and beverages containing caloric and low-calorie sweeteners over the last decade in the United States. Pediatric Obesity, 8, 294–306. doi:10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00153.x10.1111/ijpo.2013.8.issue-4
59. Pomeranz, J. L. (2014). Sugary beverage tax policy: Lessons learned from tobacco. American Journal of Public Health, 104, e13–e15. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.30180010.2105/AJPH.2013.301800
60. Powell, L. M., Chriqui, J. F., Khan, T., Wada, R., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2013). Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: A systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. Obesity Reviews, 14, 110–128. doi:10.1111/obr.12002.10.1111/obr.12002
61. Proctor, R. N. (2006). “Everyone knew but no one had proof”: Tobacco industry use of medical history expertise in US courts, 1990–2002. Tobacco Control, 15, iv117–iv25.
62. Proctor, R. N. (2011). Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
63. Pulido, T. (2012, November 7). Soda tax lost, but Richmond still won (sort of). Richmond Pulse.
64. Ravdin, G. (2014). Sugar sweetened beverage polling report. In Using the right messages for sugar sweetened beverages: Results from research in Los Angeles, California and Vermont. Webinar. Princeton, NJ: Hosted by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the American Heart Association.
65. Reedy, J., & Krebs-Smith, S. M. (2010). Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110, 1477–1484.10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.010
66. Rogers, R. (2012, July 15). Bitter fight over sugar: A councilman in Richmond leads an effort to tax sugary drinks. Rich foes line up against him. Los Angeles Times.
67. Roisman, H. (2013a, October 11). Deep in the heart of taxes, redux. Telluride Daily Planet.
68. Roisman, H. (2013b, November 1). Responding to the R-1 board. Telluride Daily Planet.
69. Ryan, C (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston, MA: South End Press.
70. Samuels, B., & Glantz, S. A. (1991). The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 2110–2117.10.1001/jama.1991.03470150082035
71. Sasseen, J., Olmstead, K., & Mitchell, A. (2013). Digital: As mobile grows rapidly, the pressures on news intensify. In The Pew Center Project for Excellence in Journalism. The state of the news media 2013: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://stateofthemedia.org/2013/digital-as-mobile-grows-rapidly-the-pressures-on-news-intensify/
72. Scheufele, D., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.10.1111/jcom.2007.57.issue-1
73. Smart Voter. (2012). Measure O: Business license fee advisory measure – City of Richmond. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.smartvoter.org/2012/11/06/ca/cc/meas/O/
74. Smith, C., & Ritterman, J. (2012, September 30). Point-counter point: Richmond measure N Soda Tax. Halfway to Concord.
75. Swisher, C. K., & Reese, S. D. (1992). The smoking and health issue in newspapers: Influence of regional economies, the tobacco institute and news objectivity. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69, 987–1000. doi:10.1177/107769909206900417
76. Taddonio, B. (2013, November 1). The best offense is a good defense. Telluride Daily Planet.
77. US Census (2010). American FactFinder – Community Facts. Retrieved March 28, 2014, from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
78. Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2007). Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 667–675.10.2105/AJPH.2005.083782
79. Velazquez, M. (2012a, July 23). El Monte Council to consider fiscal emergency, “sweet” tax for November ballot. San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
80. Velazquez, M. (2012b, October 8). El Monte to spend roughly $100,000 to place “soda tax” on special election ballot. San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
81. Velazquez, M. (2012c, September 6). Residents, business owners file arguments on El Monte ballot initiatives. San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
82. Wang, Y. C., Coxson, P., Shen, Y. M., Goldman, L., & Bibbins-Domingo, K. (2012). A penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would cut health and cost burdens of diabetes. Health Affairs, 31, 199–207. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.041010.1377/hlthaff.2011.0410
83. Welsh, J. A., Sharma, A. J., Grellinger, L., & Vos, M. B. (2011). Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94, 726–734.10.3945/ajcn.111.018366
84. Whitney, S. (2012, May 16). Soda tax voted on to Richmond ballot. Richmond Confidential.
85. Wilkey, R. (2013, October 28). San Francisco soda tax proposed by city supervisor. The Huffington Post.
86. Woodward-Lopez, G., Kao, J., & Ritchie, L. (2010). To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic? Public Health Nutr, 14, 499–509. doi: 10.1017/s1368980010002375
87. Yach, D., & Bialous, S. A. (2001). Junking science to promote tobacco. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1745–1748. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.11.174510.2105/AJPH.91.11.1745
88. Yanamadala, S., Bragg, M. A., Roberto, C. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2012). Food industry front groups and conflicts of interest: The case of Americans against food taxes. Public Health Nutrition, 15, 1331–1332.10.1017/S1368980012003187
89. Zingale, D. (2012, December 9). Gulp! The high cost of Big Soda’s victory. Los Angeles Times.