Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients’ preferences

Palliative Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 625-633

  Henselmans, Inge ^a   Van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M ^a   Van der Vloodt, Jane ^a   De Haes, Hanneke C J M ^a   Smets, Ellen M A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision making; medical oncology; palliative care; patient participation; physician patient relations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON CANCER; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MALE; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PANCREAS CANCER; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SARCOMA; SHARED DECISION MAKING; STOMACH CANCER; DECISION MAKING; DRUG THERAPY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VERY ELDERLY;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; DRUG THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PALLIATIVE CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 85020920646     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: 1477030X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269216316676010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Shah MA. Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 778–784.
2. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH., Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Vox Sang 2002; 83(Suppl. 1): 383–386.
3. Hoffman TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C., The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA 2014; 312: 1295–1296.
4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T., Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681–692.
5. De Kort SJ, Pols J, Richel DJ. Understanding palliative cancer chemotherapy: about shared decisions and shared trajectories. Health Care Anal 2010; 18: 164–174.
6. Seminar SG., Salzburg statement of shared decision making. BMJ 2011; 342: 1745.
7. Shay LA, Lafata JE., Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making 2015; 35: 114–131.
8. Kashaf MS, McGill E., Does shared decision making in cancer treatment improve quality of life? A systematic literature review. Med Decis Making 2015; 35: 1037–1048.
9. Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 86: 9–18.
10. Brom L, Pasman HRW, Widdershoven GAM. Patients’ preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e100435.
11. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1361–1367.
12. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC., Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98: 1172–1179.
13. Rohan MJ., A rose by any name? The values construct. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2000; 4: 255–277.
14. Pieterse AH, Henselmans I, de Haes JCJM. Shared decision making: prostate cancer patients’ appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists’ eliciting and responding behavior, an explorative study. Patient Educ Couns 2012; 85: e251–e259.
15. Feldman-Stewart D, Tong C, Siemens R. The impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Med Decis Making 2012; 32: 616–626.
16. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C., A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psychooncology 2005; 14: 801–809.
17. Voogt E, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA. Attitudes of patients with incurable cancer toward medical treatment in the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2012–2019.
18. Kunneman M, Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM. Treatment preferences and involvement in treatment decision making of patients with endometrial cancer and clinicians. Br J Cancer 2014; 111: 674–679.
19. Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Baas-Thijssen MC. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferences. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 717–724.
20. Jansen SJ, Kievit J, Nooij MA. Patients’ preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile? Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 1577–1585.
21. Davidson PM, Jiwa M, Goldsmith AJ. Decisions for lung cancer chemotherapy: the influence of physician and patient factors. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19: 1261–1266.
22. Kunneman MM, Baas-Thijssen MC, Van der Linden YM. Considering patient values and treatment preferences enhances patient involvement in rectal cancer treatment decision making. Radiother Oncol. Epub ahead of print 11 September 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.09.005.
23. Buiting HM, Rurup ML, Wijsbek H. Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study. BMJ 2011; 342: d1933.
24. The AM, Hak T, Koeter G. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ 2000; 321: 1376–1381.
25. De Haes H. Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: a case for vulnerability. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 62: 291–298.
26. De Haes HC, Koedoot N. Patient centered decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a world of paradoxes. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 43–49.
27. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1245–1251.
28. Graneheim UH, Lundman B., Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24: 105–112.
29. MAXqda 10. The art of text analysis. Berlin: VERBI Software Consult, Sozialforschung GmbH, 2010.
30. Del Piccolo L, de Haes H, Heaven C. Development of the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences to code health providers’ responses (VR-CoDES-P) to patient cues and concerns. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 82: 149–155.
31. Connor M, Fletcher I, Salmon P., The analysis of verbal interaction sequences in dyadic clinical communication: a review of methods. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75: 169–177.
32. Fridman I, Epstein AS, Higgins ET., Appropriate use of psychology in patient-physician communication: influencing wisely. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 725–726.
33. Henselmans I, Smets EM, Van Laarhoven HW., Decision making about treatment for advanced cancer: influencing wisely? JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 1169.
34. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MPT. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012; 344: e256.
35. Hillen MA, de Haes HCJM, van Tienhoven G. All eyes on the patient: the influence of oncologists’ nonverbal communication on breast cancer patients’ trust. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 153: 161–171.
36. Henry SG, Jerant A, Iosif AM. Analysis of threats to research validity introduced by audio recording clinic visits: selection bias, Hawthorne effect, both, or neither? Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98: 849–856.
37. Pringle M, Stewartevans C., Does awareness of being video recorded affect doctors consultation behavior. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40: 455–458.
38. Mazer BL, Cameron RA, DeLuca JM. ‘Speaking-for’ and ‘speaking-as’: pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 96: 36–42.