Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies with one continuous covariate

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 1199-1215

  Gutman, R ^a   Rubin, D B ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal inference; matching; regression adjustment; Rubin causal model; spline

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE; HUMAN; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85020723922     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: 14770334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280215570722     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Rubin DB,. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 1974; 66: 688-688.
2. Rubin DB,. Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat 1978; 6: 34-58.
3. Rubin DB,. Comment on randomization analysis of experimental data: the fisher randomization test. J Am Stat Assoc 1980; 75: 591-593.
4. Rubin DB,. Formal modes of statistical inference for causal effects. J Stat Plan Infer 1990; 25: 279-292.
5. Holland PW,. Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 1986; 81: 945-970.
6. Rubin DB. Bayesian inference for causality: the importance of randomization. In: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1975, pp.233-239.
7. Rubin DB,. Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J Educ Behav Stat 1977; 2: 1-26.
8. Neyman J,. Sur les applications de la thar des probabilities aux experiences agaricales: essay de principle. English translation of excerpts by Dabrowska D and Speed T (1990). Stat Sci 1923; 5: 465-472.
9. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB,. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41-55.
10. Cochran WG,. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics 1968; 24: 295-313.
11. Rubin DB,. Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 1973; 29: 159-183.
12. Rubin DB,. Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74: 318-328.
13. Rubin DB, Thomas N,. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 2000; 95: 573-585.
14. Rubin DB,. Matched sampling for causal effects, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
15. Rosenbaum PR,. Design of observational studies, New York, NY: Springer Verlag, 2009.
16. Rubin DB,. The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 1973; 29: 185-203.
17. Shah BR, Laupacis A, Hux JE, et al. Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 550-559.
18. Lunceford JK, Davidian M,. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med 2004; 23: 2937-2960.
19. Robins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP,. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. J Am Stat Assoc 1994; 89: 846-866.
20. Austin PC,. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Making 2009; 29: 661-677.
21. Waernbaum I,. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation. Stat Med 2012; 31: 1572-1581.
22. Austin PC,. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med 2014; 33: 1057-1069.
23. Lehmann EL, Romano JP,. Testing statistical hypotheses, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2005.
24. Chambers CD, Johnson KA, Dick LM, et al. Birth outcomes in pregnant women taking fluoxetine. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1010-1015.
25. Gastil J, Pierre Deess E, Weiser P,. Civic awakening in the jury room: a test of connection between jury deliberation and political participation. J Polit 2002; 64: 585-595.
26. O'Dea JA, Wilson R,. Socio-cognitive and nutritional factors associated with body mass index in children and adolescents: possibilities for childhood obesity prevention. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 796-805.
27. Fisher RA,. Statistical methods for research workers, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyed, 1932.
28. Cochran WG, Rubin DB,. Controlling bias in observational studies: a review. SankhyÄ Indian J Stat Ser A 1973; 35: 417-466.
29. McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Austin PC,. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data. Stat Med 2009; 28: 94-112.
30. Myers JA, Louis TA,. Comparing treatments via the propensity score: stratification or modeling. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2012; 12: 1-15.
31. Marsh LC, Cormier DR,. Spline regression models, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage University, 2002.
32. Eubank RL,. Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 1999.
33. Boor C,. A practical guide to splines, New York, NY: Springer, 2001.
34. Stone CJ,. Generalized additive models: comment. Stat Sci 1986; 1: 312-314.
35. Harrell FE,. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
36. Hastie T, Tibshirani R,. Generalized additive models, 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1990.
37. Wahba G,. Spline models for observational data, 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1990.
38. Wood SN,. On confidence intervals for generalized additive models based on penalized regression splines. Aust NZ J Stat 2003; 48: 445-464.
39. Rubin DB, Thomas N,. Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 2000; 95: 573-585.
40. Stuart EA,. Matching methods for causal inference. Stat Sci 2010; 25: 1-21.
41. Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM,. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Literature 2009; 47: 5-86.
42. Austin PC,. Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses. Int J Biostat 2009; 5 (1): Article 13-Article 13.
43. Abadie A, Drukker D, Herr JL, et al. Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata. Stata J 2004; 4: 290-311.
44. Sekhon JS,. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 2011; 42: 1-52.
45. Imbens G, Rubin DB,. Causal inference in statistics, and in the social and biomedical sciences, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
46. Rosenbaum PR,. A characterization of optimal designs for observational studies. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 1991; 53: 597-610.
47. Hansen BB,. Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the sat. J Am Stat Assoc 2004; 99: 609-618.
48. Rosenbaum PR,. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc 1987; 82: 387-394.
49. Rubin DB, Thomas N,. Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions. Biometrika 1992; 79: 797-809.
50. Hirano K, Imbens G, Ridder G,. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 2003; 71: 1161-1189.
51. Kang JDY, Schafer JL,. Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Stat Sci 2007; 4: 1-18.
52. Abadie A, Imbens GW,. Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J Bus Econ Stat 2011; 29: 1-11.
53. Espindle LP. Improving confidence coverage for the estimate of the treatment effect in a subclassification setting, Bachelor's thesis, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, May 2004.
54. Azzalini A,. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat 1985; 12: 171-178.
55. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB,. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 1985; 39: 33-38.
56. Cangul MZ, Chretien YR, Gutman R, et al. Testing treatment effects in unconfounded studies under model misspecification: logistic regression, discretization, and their combination. Stat Med 2009; 28: 2531-2551.
57. Lin J,. Divergence measures based on Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 1991; 37: 145-151.
58. Kullback S, Leibler RA,. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 1951; 22: 79-86.
59. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014, http://www.R-project.org (accessed August 2014).
60. Hansen BB, Klopfer SO,. Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J Comput Graph Stat 2006; 15: 609-627.
61. Imai K, Ratkovic M,. Covariate balancing propensity score. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 2014; 76 (1): 243-263.
62. Gutman R, Rubin DB,. Robust estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies with dichotomous outcomes. Stat Med 2013; 32: 1795-1814.