A dynamic framework for analyzing technology standardisation using network analysis and game theory

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 540-555

  Kim, Keungoui ^a   Jung, Sungdo ^b   Hwang, Junseok ^a   Hong, Ahreum ^c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Fire Equipment Inspection Corporation   (South Korea)

^c Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

game theory; network analysis; patent analysis; Standardisation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GAME THEORY; NETWORK ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 85020699651     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1340639     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Amatulli, C., T., Caputo, and G., Guido. 2011. “Strategic Analysis through the General Electric/Mckinsey Matrix: An Application to the Italian Fashion Industry.” International Journal of Business and Management 6 (5): 61–75. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n5p61
2. Angulo, J., J., Calzada, and A., Estruch. 2011. “Selection of Standards for Digital Television: The Battle for Latin America.” Telecommunications Policy 35 (8): 773–787. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.07.007
3. Arthur, W. B., 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Journal of Econometrics, 99 (394): 116–131.
4. Bekkers, R., R., Bongard, and A., Nuvolari. 2011. “An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential IPR Claims in Compatibility Standards.” Research Policy 40 (7): 1001–1015. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.004
5. Belleflamme, P., 1998. “Adoption of Network Technologies in Oligopolies.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (4): 415–444. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00003-4
6. Berg, S. V., 1988. “Duopoly Compatibility Standards with Partial Cooperation and Standards Leadership.” Information Economics and Policy 3 (1): 35–53. doi: 10.1016/0167-6245(88)90013-3
7. Bergek, A., C., Berggren, and F., Tell. 2009. “Do Technology Strategies Matter? A Comparison of Two Electrical Engineering Corporations, 1988–1998.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 21 (4): 445–470. doi: 10.1080/09537320902818744
8. Berger, F., K., Blind, and N., Thumm. 2012. “Filing Behavior Regarding Essential IPRs in Industry Standards.” Research Policy 41 (1): 216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.004
9. Bresnahan, T. F., and S., Greenstein. 1996. “Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics 47 (1): 1–77. doi: 10.2307/2534746
10. Chang, S. C. W., and H., Huang. 2016. “Institutional Logics, Work and Outcomes: The Case of Soy and Toshiba in the HD Optical Disc Standard War.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research 27 (1): 37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2016.04.004
11. Choi, E., and K. C., Lee. 2016. “Relationship Between Social Network Structure Dynamics and Innovation: Micro-Level Analyses of Virtual Cross-Functional Teams in a Multinational B2B Firm.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.021
12. Crepon, B., E., Duguet, and J., Mairesse. 1998. “Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7 (2): 115–158. doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
13. Curran, C., and J., Leker. 2011. “Patent Indicators for Monitoring Convergence: Examples from NFF and ICT.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (2): 256–273. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021
14. Dyson, R. G., 2004. “Strategic Development and SWOT Analysis at the University of Warwick.” European Journal of Operational Research 152: 631–640. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00062-6
15. Egbetokun, A. A., 2015. “The More the Merrier? Network Portfolio Size and Innovation Performance in Nigerian Firms.” Technovation 43-44: 17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.004
16. Farrell, J., and G., Saloner. 1985. “Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation.” The RAND Journal of Economics 16: 70–83. doi: 10.2307/2555589
17. Farrell, J., and G., Saloner. 1992. “Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 40 (1): 9–35. doi: 10.2307/2950625
18. Funk, J. L., and D. T., Methe. 2001. “Market- and Committee-Based Mechanisms in the Creation and Diffusion of Global Industry Standards: The Case of Mobile Communication.” Research Policy 30 (4): 589–610. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00095-0
19. Gallagher, S. R., 2012. “The Battle of the Blue Laser DVDs: The Significance of Corporate Strategy in Standards Battles.” Technovation 32 (2): 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.004
20. Gandal, N., 1994. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and Empirical Test for Network-Externalities.” The RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1): 160–170. doi: 10.2307/2555859
21. Geum, Y., C., Kim, S., Lee, and M. S., Kim. 2012. “Technological Convergence of IT and BT: Evidence from Patent Analysis.” ETRI Journal 34 (3): 439–449. doi: 10.4218/etrij.12.1711.0010
22. Hartman, R. S., and D. J., Teece. 1990. “Product Emulation Strategies in the Presence of Reputation Effects and Network Externalities: Some Evidence from Minicomputer Industry.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1 (1-2): 157–182. doi: 10.1080/10438599000000009
23. Hovav, A., M., Hemmert, and Y. J., Kim. 2011. “Determinants of Internet Standards Adoption: The Case of South Korea.” Research Policy 40 (2): 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.016
24. Hovav, A., R., Patnayakuni, and D., Schuff. 2004. “A Model of Internet Standards Adoption: The Case of IPv6.” Information Systems Journal 14 (3): 265–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00170.x
25. Hovav, A., and D., Schuff. 2005. “The Changing Dynamics of the Internet: Adoption Patterns of the IPv6 Standard.” Communications of AIS 15: 242–262.
26. Jost, L., 2006. “Entropy and Diversity.” OIKOS 113 (2): 363–375.
27. Kaa, G., J., Ende, H. J., Vries, and E., Heck. 2011. “Factors for Winning Interface Format Battles: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (8): 1397–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.011
28. Kaa, G., and H. J., Vries. 2015. “Factors for Winning Format Battles: A Comparative Case Study.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 91 (2): 222–235.
29. Kang, B., and K., Motohashi. 2015. “Essential Intellectual Property Rights and Inventors’ Involvement in Standardization.” Research Policy 44 (2): 483–492. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.012
30. Kelly, K., 1998. New Rules for the New Economy: Ten Radical Strategies for a Connected World. New York: Penguin Books.
31. Kim, K., S., Jung, and J., Hwang. 2015. “A Study on Technology Standardization Method Using Network Analysis: Focused on Wireless Communication Technology Layer of Internet of Things.” Journal of Technology Innovation 23 (3): 43–66.
32. Monge, P. R., and N. S., Contractor. 2003. Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Nickerson, J. V., and M. Z., Muehlen. 2006. “The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from Internet Standard Making.” MIS Quarterly 30: 467–488. doi: 10.2307/25148769
34. Ohashi, H., 2003. “The Role of Network Effects in the US VCR Market, 1978–1986.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 12 (4): 447–494. doi: 10.1162/105864003322538929
35. Park, Y., and J., Yoon. 2017. “Application Technology Opportunity Discovery From Technology Portfolios: Use of Patent Classification and Collaborative Filtering.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118: 170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.018
36. Rogers, E. M., 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
37. Rysman, M., T., Simcoe, and C., Heath. 2008. “Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations.” Management Science 54 (11): 1920–1934. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0919
38. Schilling, M. A., 2002. “Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities.” The Academy of Management Journal 45 (2): 387–398. doi: 10.2307/3069353
39. Scott, J., 2003. Social Network Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
40. Shankar, V., and B. L., Bayus. 2003. “Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Video Game Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 24 (4): 375–384. doi: 10.1002/smj.296
41. Shapiro, C., and H. R., Varian. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Shin, D., H., Kim, and J., Hwang. 2015. “Standardization Revisited: A Critical Literature Review on Standards and Innovation.” Computer Standards and Interfaces 38: 152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2014.09.002
43. Suzuki, J., and F., Kodama. 2004. “Technological Diversity of Persistent Innovators in Japan.” Research Policy 33 (5): 531–549. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.10.005
44. Tassey, G., 2000. “Standardization in Technology-Based Markets.” Research Policy 29 (4-5): 587–602. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00091-8
45. Tseng, C. Y., S. C., Lin, D. C., Pai, and P. C., Tung. 2016. “The Relationship between Innovation Network and Innovation Capability: A Social Network Perspective.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 28 (9): 1029–1040. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2016.1181739
46. Wasserman, S., and K., Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Weitzel, T., 2004. Economics of Standards in Information Networks. New York: Physica-Verlag.
48. Xie, Z., J., Hall, I. P., McCarthy, M., Skitmore, and L., Shen. 2016. “Standardization Efforts: The Relationship Between Knowledge Dimensions, Search Processes and Innovation Outcomes.” Technovation 48-49: 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.002
49. Xue, X., X., Zhanag, L., Wang, M., Skitmore, and Q., Wang. 2017. “Analyzing Collaborative Relationships among Industrialized Construction Technology Innovation Organizations: A Combined SNA and SEM Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production 147: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.072
50. Yoon, B., and R., Phaal. 2013. “Structuring Technological Information for Technology Roadmapping: Data Mining Approach.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 25 (9): 1119–1137. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.832744