Analysis of production, impact, and scientific collaboration on difficult airway through the web of science and scopus (1981-2013)

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 124, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1886-1896

  García Aroca, Miguel Ángel ^a,b   Pandiella Dominique, Andrés ^c   Navarro Suay, Ricardo ^a,b,d   Alonso Arroyo, Adolfo ^e   Granda Orive, José Ignacio ^f,g   Anguita Rodríguez, Francisco ^h   López García, Andrés ⁱ  

^a HOSPITAL CENTRAL DE LA DEFENSA GÓMEZ ULLA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^c Autonomous University of Madrid Instituto Interuniversitario Investigación Avanzada sobre Evaluación de la Ciencia y la Universidad   (Spain)

^d Joint Institute for Biomedical Research of Defence (IMIDEF)   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^f HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO 12 DE OCTUBRE   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^h UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA   (Spain)

ⁱ Montepríncipe University Hospital   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SCOPUS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEB OF SCIENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; PRODUCTIVITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME FACTOR; TRENDS; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85020394993     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: 15267598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002058     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Utting JE. Pitfalls in anaesthetic practice. Br J Anaesth. 1987; 59: 877-890.
2. Gannon K. Mortality associated with anaesthesia A case review study. Anaesthesia. 1991; 46: 962-966.
3. Lee LA, Domino KB. The Closed Claims Project. Has it influenced anesthetic practice and outcome?. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2002; 20: 485-501.
4. Woodward S, Randall S, Hoey A, Bishop R. Seven steps to patient safety: a guide for NHS staff. National Patient Safety Agency. 2004. Available at: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/.resources/?entryid45=59787. Accessed November 2015.
5. Naguib M, Scamman FL, O'Sullivan C, et al. Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: a double-blind, case-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 818-824.
6. Henderson J. Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD, ed. Miller?s Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Publishers, 2010: 1573-1610.
7. Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C. Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 106: 617-631.
8. Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109(suppl 1): i68-i85.
9. Shirgoska B, Netkovski J. New techniques and devices for difficult airway management. Acta Clin Croat. 2012; 51: 457-461.
10. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 1993; 78: 597-602.
11. Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, et al. The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth. 1998; 45: 757-776.
12. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on management of the difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98: 1269-1277.
13. Braun U, Goldmann K, Hempel V, Krier C. Airway management. Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. (Airway management. Guidelines of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care). Anaesth Intensiv Med. 2004; 45: 302-306.
14. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult Airway Society. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 675-694.
15. Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, et al. Gruppo di Studio SIAARTI Vie Aeree Difficili; IRC e SARNePI; Task Force. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 2005; 71: 617-657.
16. Langeron O, Bourgain JL, Laccoureye O, Legras A, Orliaguet G. Difficult airway algorithms and management: question 5. Société Française d?Anesthésie et de Réanimation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008; 27: 41-45.
17. Valero R, Mayoral V, Massó E, et al. Evaluation and management of expected or unexpected difficult airways: adopting practice guidelines. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2008; 55: 563-570.
18. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118: 251-270.
19. Thomson Reuters Scientific. Whitepaper using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. Thomson Reuters Scientific. Available at: http://wokinfo.com/.media/mtrp/UsingBibliometricsinEval-WP.pdf. Accessed November 2015.
20. Marchant T. An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-ratio and some other bibliometric rankings of authors. Scientometrics. 2009; 80: 327-344.
21. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA. Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics. 2011; 87: 499-514.
22. Torres-Salinas D, Jiménez Contreras E. Hacia las unidades de bibliometría en las universidades: modelo y funciones. (Towards bibliometrics units in universities: model and functions). Rev Esp Doc Cient. 2012; 35: 469-480.
23. Ida TY, Harder LD, Kudo G. Demand-driven resource investment in annual seed production by a perennial angiosperm precludes resource limitation. Ecology. 2013; 94: 51-61.
24. Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2015; 1-16 (online first article
25. Bradford SC. Sources of information on specific subject. Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal. 1934; 137: 85-86.
26. Bradford SC. Documentation. London, UK: Crosby Lockwood & Son; 1948.
27. Wolfram D. Applications of SQL for informetric frequency distribution processing. Scientometrics. 2006; 67: 301-313.
28. Martín Escofet C. El lenguaje SQL. (The SQL language). UOC OpenCourseWare. Available at: http://ocw.uoc.edu. Accessed March 2014.
29. Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Pajek and Pajek-XXL Programs for Analysis and Visualization of Very Large Networks. Reference Manual. List of commands with short explanation, version 4.06. Ljubljana, November 2, 2015. Available at: http://mrvar.fdv. uni-lj.si/pajek/. Accessed November 2015.
30. De Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis With Pajek. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
31. Brambrink AM, Ehrler D, Dick WF. Publications on paediatric anaesthesia: a quantitative analysis of publication activity and international recognition. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 85: 556-562.
32. Moppett IK, Hardman JG. Bibliometrics of anaesthesia researchers in the UK. Br J Anaesth. 2011; 107: 351-356.
33. Mowafi HA. Bibliometric analysis of the volume and visibility of Saudi publications in leading anesthesia journals. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012; 6: 393-397.
34. Zhang WJ, Ding W, Jiang H, Zhang YF, Zhang JL. National representation in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70: 231-234.
35. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA A bibliometric analysis of geographic publication variations in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia from 1990 to 2011. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013; 27: 208-212.
36. Tripathi RS, Blum JM, Papadimos TJ, Rosenberg AL A bibliometric search of citation classics in anesthesiology. BMC Anesthesiol. 2011; 12: 11-24.
37. Schreiber K, Girard T, Kindler CH. Bibliometric analysis of original molecular biology research in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 1002-1007.
38. Zambon M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Bignami E, Ruggeri L, Zangrillo A, Landoni G A comprehensive appraisal of meta-Analyses focusing on nonsurgical treatments aimed at decreasing perioperative mortality or major cardiac complications. J Anesth. 2012; 26: 509-515.
39. Jankovic MP, Kaufmann M, Kindler CH. Active research fields in anesthesia: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106: 1524-1533.
40. Landoni G, Bignami E, Nicolotti D, et al. Publication trends in the journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: a 10-year analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010; 24: 969-973.
41. Ramsdell R, Lerman J, Pickhardt D, Feldman D, Foster J, Houle TT. Subspecialty impact factors: the contribution of pediatric anesthesia and pain articles. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108: 105-110.
42. Mulita A, Liu X, Desai SP. Publication trends for articles related to the history of anesthesia: A 10 year analysis from six journals. Bull Anesth Hist. 2013; 31: 1, 3-6, 13.
43. Jackson GN, Mackenzie MJ, Arrandale LA, Yentis SM. Abstracts and papers published in the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia since inception. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010; 19: 188-192.
44. Teoh DC, Schramm B. Changes in clinical research in anaesthesia and intensive care from 1974-2004. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006; 34: 753-757.
45. de Granda-Orive JI, García Río F, Aleixandre Benavent R, et al. Spanish productivity in smoking research relative to world and European union productivity from 1999 through 2003, analyzed with the science citation index. Arch Bronconeumol. 2007; 43: 212-218.
46. Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Research output in anaesthesia: a quantitative ranking. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57: 1213-1214.
47. Wren JD, Kozak KZ, Johnson KR, Deakyne SJ, Schilling LM, Dellavalle RP. The write position A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Rep. 2007; 8: 988-991.
48. De Granda-Orive JI, Villanueva-Serrano S, Aleixandre-Benavent R, et al. World-wide collaboration among medical specialities in smoking research: production, collaboration, visibility and influence.Res Eval. 2009; 18: 3-12.
49. De Granda-Orive JI, Villanueva-Serrano S, Aleixandre-Benavent R, et al. Redes de colaboración científica internacional en tabaquismo: análisis de coautorías mediante el Science Citation ratio durante el periodo 1.999-2.003. (Network of international scientific collaboration on smoking: analysis of coauthorship through the Science Citation Index (1999-2003)). Gac Sanit. 2009; 23: 222.e34-222.e43.
50. Jankovic MP, Kaufmann M, Kindler CH. Active research fields in anesthesia: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106: 1524-1533.
51. Wachtel RE, Dexter F. Difficulties and challenges associated with literature searches in operating room management, complete with recommendations. Anesth Analg. 2013; 117: 1460-1479.
52. Vann Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, Moed HF, Nederhof TJ, Van Raan AFJ. The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics. 2003; 57: 257-280.
53. Costas-Comesaña R. Análisis bibliométrico de la actividad científica de los investigadores del CSIC en tres áreas: Biología y Biomedicina, Ciencia de Materiales y Recursos Naturales. Una aproximación metodológica a nivel micro (Web of Science, 1994- 2004). Tesis doctoral. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Getafe: Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación, 2008. (Bibliometric analysis of scientific activity of researchers from the CSIC in three areas: Biology and Biomedicine, Materials Science, and Natural Resources A methodological approach at micro level (Web of Science, 1994- 2004). Dissertation. Carlos III University, Getafe. Madrid. Department of Library and Information Science