Modelling consensus building in Delphi practices for participated transport planning

Transportation Research Procedia

Volumn 25, Issue , 2017, Pages 3725-3735

  Le Pira, Michela ^a   Inturri, Giuseppe ^a   Ignaccolo, Matteo ^a   Pluchino, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

agent based modelling; AHP; Delphi method; group decision making process; multicriteria decision making methods; participatory transport planning; public participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020309894     PISSN: 23521457     EISSN: 23521465     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.226     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Anand N., Van Duin J.R., Quak H., and Tavasszy L.A. Relevance of City Logistics Modelling Efforts: A Review Transport Reviews 35 6 2015 701 719
2. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of Citizen Participation Journal of the American Planning Association 35 1969 216 224
3. Banister D. The sustainable mobility paradigm Transport Policy 15 2008 73 80
4. Bazzan A.L.C., Klügl F., and Ossowski S. Agents in traffic and transportation: Exploring autonomy in logistics management, simulation, and cooperative driving. Transportation Research Part C 13 2005 251 254
5. Cascetta, E., Pagliara, F. 2013. Public engagement for planning and designing transportation systems. SIDT Scientific Seminar 2012. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 87, 103 - 116.
6. Cascetta E., Cartenì A., Pagliara F., and Montanino M. A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods. Transport Policy 38 2015 27 39
7. Castellano C., Fortunato S., and Loreto V. Statistical physics of social dynamics Reviews of Modern Physics 81 2009 591 646
8. Columbu G.L., De Martino A., and Giansanti A. Nature and statistics of majority rankings in a dynamical model of preference aggregation Physica A 387 2008 1338 1344
9. Condorcet Marquis de Essai sur l'Application de l'Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix 1785 Imprimerie Royale. Paris France
10. Dalkey N., and Helmer O. An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts Management Science 9 1963 458 467
11. De Luca S. Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach Transport Policy 33 2014 110 124
12. Dong Y., Zhang G., Hong W., and Xu Y. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method Decision Support Systems 49 2010 281 289
13. García-Melón M., Gómez-Navarro T., and Acuña-Dutra S. A combined ANP-delphi approach to evaluate sustainable tourism Environmental Impact Assessment Review 34 2012 41 50
14. Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F., and Chiclana F. A Consensus Model for Multiperson Decision Making With Different Preference Structures IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man And Cybernetics - Part A: Systems And Humans 32 3 2002
15. Ignaccolo M., Inturri G., Le Pira M., Caprì S., and Mancuso V. Evaluating the role of land use and transport policies in reducing the transport energy dependence of a city Research in Transportation Economics 55 2016 60 66
16. Klügl F., Bazzan A.L.C., and Ossowski S. Agents in traffic and transportation Transportation Research Part C 18 2010 69 70
17. Le Pira, M. 2015. Towards participatory decision-making processes in transport planning: an agent-based approach. PhD thesis, University of Catania, Italy.
18. Le Pira, M., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Garofalo, C., Pluchino A., Rapisarda, A. 2013. Agent-based modelling of Stakeholder Interaction in Transport Decisions. Selected Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR), 15th-18th July 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. ISBN: 978-85-285-0232-9.
19. Le Pira, M. Inturri, G. Ignaccolo, M. Pluchino, and A. Rapisarda Simulating opinion dynamics on stakeholders' networks through agent-based modeling for collective transport decisions Procedia Computer Science 52 2015 884 889 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.146
20. Le Pira, M. Inturri, G. Ignaccolo, and M. Pluchino Analysis of AHP methods and the Pairwise Majority Rule (PMR) for collective preference rankings of sustainable mobility solutions Transportation Research Procedia 10 2015 777 787
21. Li T. H.Y., Ng S.T., and Skitmore M. Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach Automation in Construction 29 2013 123 135
22. Litman T. Transportation cost and benefit analysis: techniques 2009 http://www.vtpi.org/tca/ estimates and implications [Second Edition]. In
23. Macal C.M., and North M.J. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation Journal of Simulation 4 2010 151 162
24. Mahmoud M., and Hine J. Using AHP to measure the perception gap between current and potential users of bus services Transportation Planning and Technology 36 1 2013 4 23
25. Mau-Crimmins T., de Steiguer J.E., and Dennis D. AHP as a means for improving public participation: a pre-post experiment with university students Forest Policy and Economics 7 2005 501 514
26. Pacinelli A. Metodi per la ricerca sociale partecipata 2008 FrancoAngeli Milan
27. Piantanakulchai M., and Saengkhao N. Evaluation of alternatives in transportation planning using multi-stakeholders multi-objectives AHP modelling Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 4 2003 October, 2003
28. Quick K., Narvaez, G. E., Saunoi-Sandgren E, 2015 Quick, K. S., Narváez, G. E., Saunoi-Sandgren, E., 2015. Changing Minds through Deliberation: Citizens' Accounts of Their Changing Local Transportation Policy. TRB 94th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. Washington, DC.
29. Raffaelli, G., Marsili, M. 2005. A Statistical Mechanics Model for the Emergence of Consensus. In: arXiv:cond-mat/0403030 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
30. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw Hill New York
31. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process - What it is and how it is used Mathl Modelling 9 3-5 1987 161 176
32. Saaty T.L., and Hu G. Ranking by Eigenvector Versus Other Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process Appl. Math. Lett. 11 4 1998 121 125
33. Sivilevičius H., and Maskeliūnaite L. The criteria for identifying the quality of passengers' transportation by railway and their ranking using AHP method Transport 25 4 2010 368 381
34. Tavana M., Kennedy D.T., Rappaport J., and Ugras Y.J. An AHP-Delphi Group Decision Support System Applied to Conflict Resolution in Hiring Decisions Journal of Management Systems 5 1993 49 74
35. Vidal L., Marle F., and Bocquet J. Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects Expert Systems with Applications 38 2011 5388 5405
36. von der Gracht H.A. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 79 2012 1525 1536