Multi-criteria analysis in compound decision processes: The AHP and the architectural competition for the Chamber of Deputies in Rome (Italy)

Buildings

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Guarini, Maria Rosaria ^a   D'Addabbo, Nicola ^a   Morano, Pierluigi ^b   Tajani, Francesco ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; Architectural competition; Compound decision process; Multi criteria evaluation; Selection of the winner project

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020274548     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20755309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/buildings7020038     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Leon, P. Stato, Mercato e Collettività; Giappichelli: Torino, Italy, 2007
2. Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005
3. Zanakis, S.H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S. Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of selection methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1998, 107, 507-529
4. Saaty, T. About a hundred years of creativity in decision making. Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 2015, 7, 138-144
5. Ishizaka, A.; Nemery, P. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2013
6. Kazana, V.; Sisak, L.; Jobstl, H.; Merlo, M. A critical overview of multiple criteria decision making methods for natural resource planning and management with reference to practice. In Proceedings of the Symposium from Theory to Practice: Gaps and Solutions in Managerial Economics and Accounting in Forestry, Prague, Czech Republic, 13-15 May 1999
7. MacCrimmon, K.R.; Cochran, J.L.; Zeleny, M. An overview of multiple objective decision making. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making; University of South Carolina Press: Colombia, DC, USA, 1973
8. Sadok, W.; Angevin, F.; Bergez, J.; Bockstaller, C.; Colomb, B.; Guichard, L.; Reau, R.; Dorè, T. Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: Implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. A review. In Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 753-767
9. Yoon, K.; Hwang, C. Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. In Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series/Number 07-104; Lewis-Beck, M., Ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995
10. Saaty, T.; Ergu, D. When is a decision making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2015, 14, 1171
11. Battisti, F.; Guarini, M.R. Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership. Int. J. Multicrit. Decis. Mak. 2017, 7, in press
12. Morano, P.; Tajani, F. The break-even analysis applied to urban renewal investments: A model to evaluate the share of social housing financially sustainable for private investors. Habitat Int. 2017, 59, 10-20
13. Saaty, T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 1977, 15, 234-281
14. Saaty, T. Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. RACSAM 2008, 102, 251-318
15. Ji, P.; Jiang, R. Scale transitivity in the AHP. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2003, 54, 896-905
16. Saaty, T. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process; Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, 6; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2007
17. Saaty, T.; Forman, E.H. The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies; Expert Choice Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996
18. Shapira, A.; Simcha, M. AHP-based weighting of factors affecting safety on construction sites with tower cranes. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009, 135, 307-318
19. Reza, B.; Sadiq, R.; Hewage, K. Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 2053-2066
20. Shapira, A.; Shoshany, M.; Nir-Goldenberg, S. Combining analytical hierarchy process and agglomerative hierarchical clustering in search of expert consensus in green corridors development management. Environ. Manag. 2013, 52, 123-135
21. Raviv, G.; Shapira, A.; Fishbain, B. AHP-based analysis of the risk potential of safety incidents: Case study of cranes in the construction industry. Saf. Sci. 2017, 91, 289-309
22. Saaty, T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980
23. Ishizaka, A. Clusters and pivots for evaluating a large number of alternatives in AHP. Pesqui. Oper. 2012, 32, 87-101
24. European Commission. Evaluation Methods for the European Union's External Assistance. Evaluation Tool. Volume 4. 2006. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/evaluation-methodsguidance-vol4_en.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2017)
25. UK Department for Communities and Local Government. Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Manual. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications (accessed on 16 March 2017)
26. Hill, T.; Westbrook, R. SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Plan. 1997, 30, 46-52
27. Wheelen, T.L.; Hunger, J.D. Strategic Management and Business Policy, 5th ed.; Addison Wesley: Berkshire, UK, 1995
28. Saaty, T.; Ozdemir, M. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math. Comput. Model. 2003, 38, 233-244
29. Guarini, M.R.; Battisti, F. Benchmarking multi-criteria evaluation methodology's application for the definition of benchmarks in a negotiation-type public-private partnership. A case of study: The integrated action programmes of the Lazio Region. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 2014, 9, 271-317
30. Guitouni, A.; Martel, J.M. Tentative guideline to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1998, 109, 501-521
31. Saaty, T. Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1994, 74, 426-447
32. Nesticò, A.; Pipolo, O. A protocol for sustainable building interventions: Financial analysis and environmental effects. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 2015, 10, 199-212
33. Las Casas, G.; Murgante, B.; Scorza, F. Regional local development strategies benefiting from open data and open tools and an outlook on the renewable energy sources contribution. In Smart Energy in the Smart City; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 275-290
34. Tajani, F.; Morano, P. Evaluation of vacant and redundant public properties and risk control: A model for the definition of the optimal mix of eligible functions. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 2017, 35, 75-100
35. Del Giudice, V.; Manganelli, B.; De Paola, P. Depreciation methods for firm's assets. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 214-227
36. Manganelli, B.; Del Giudice, V.; De Paola, P. Linear programming in a multi-criteria model for real estate appraisal. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 182-192
37. Morano, P.; Locurcio, M.; Tajani, F.; Guarini, M.R. Fuzzy logic and coherence control in multi-criteria evaluation of urban redevelopment projects. IJBIDM 2015, 10, 73-93
38. Guarini, M.R.; Battisti, F.; Buccarini, C. Rome: requalification program for the street markets in public-private partnership. A further proposal for the Flaminio. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 838-841, 2928-2933