Clusters and pivots for evaluating a large numberof alternatives in AHP

Pesquisa Operacional

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 87-101

  Ishizaka, Alessio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Multicriteria decision making (MCDM); Supplier selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860843938     PISSN: 01017438     EISSN: 16785142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-74382012005000002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AGUARóN J & MORENO-JIMéNEZ J. 2000. Local Stability Intervals in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(1): 113-132.
2. AGUARóN J & MORENO-JIMéNEZ J. 2003. The Geometric Consistency Index: Approximated Thresholds. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1): 137-145.
3. AISSAOUI N & HAOUARI M ET AL. 2007. Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review. Computers & Operations Research, 34(12): 3516-3540.
4. BANA E COSTA C & VANSNICK J. 2008. A Critical Analysis of the Eigenvalue Method Used to Derive Priorities in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3): 1422-1428.
5. BARZILAI J. 1997. Deriving Weights from Pairwise Comparisons Matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(12): 1226-1232.
6. BARZILAI J. 2001. Notes on the analytic hierarchy process. Proceedings of the NSF Design and Manufacturing Research Conference, Tampa.
7. BARZILAI J. 2005. Measurement and preference function modelling. International Transactions in Operational Research, 12(2): 173-183.
8. BARZILAI J & COOK WD ET AL. 1987. Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives. Operations research letters, 6(1): 131-134.
9. BARZILAI J & GOLANY B. 1990. Derivingweightsfrompairwisecomparisonmatrices: theadditive case. Operations Research Letters, 9(6): 407-410.
10. BELTON V & GEAR A. 1983. On a Shortcoming of Saaty's Method of Analytical Hierarchies. Omega, 11(3): 228-230.
11. CRAWFORD G & WILLIAMS C. 1985. A Note on the Analysis of Subjective Judgement Matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4): 387-405.
12. DE BOER L & LABRO E ET AL. 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(2): 75-89.
13. DONEGAN H & DODD F ET AL. 1992. A new approach to AHP decision-making. The Statician, 41(3): 295-302.
14. DYER J. 1990. Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36(3): 249-258.
15. EL-SAWALHI N & EATON D ET AL. 2007. Contractor pre-qualification model: State-of-the-art. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5): 465-474.
16. FORMAN E & GASS S. 2001. The Analytic Hierarchy Process-An Exposition. Operations Research, 49(4): 469-486.
17. FORMAN EH. 1993. Facts and fictions about the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and computer modelling, 17(4-5): 19-26.
18. GOLDEN B & WASIL E ET AL. 1989. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
19. HARKER P & VARGAS L. 1987. The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 33(11): 1383-1403.
20. HARKER PT. 1987. Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling, 9(11): 837-848.
21. HO W. 2008. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1): 211-228.
22. HO W & XU X ET AL. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1): 16-24.
23. HOECHT A & TROTT P. 2006. Outsourcing, information leakage and the risk of losing technology based competencies. European Business Review, 18(5): 395-412.
24. ISHIZAKA A & BALKENBORG D ET AL. 2010. Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4): 700-710.
25. ISHIZAKA A & LABIB A. 2009. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: benefits and limitations. OR Insight, 22(4): 201-220.
26. ISHIZAKA A & LABIB A. 2011. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11): 14336-14345.
27. ISHIZAKA A & LUSTI M. 2004. An Expert Module to Improve the Consistency of AHP Matrices. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11(1): 97-105.
28. ISHIZAKA A & LUSTI M. 2006. How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 14(4): 387-400.
29. JOHNSON C & BEINE W ET AL. 1979. Right-LeftAsymmetryinanEigenvectorRankingProcedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19(1): 61-64.
30. KARAPETROVIC S & ROSENBLOOM E. 1999. A Quality Control Approach to Consistency Paradoxes in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(3): 704-718.
31. KUMAR S & VAIDYA O. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1): 1-29.
32. KWIESIELEWICZ M & VAN UDEN E. 2004. Inconsistent and Contradictory Judgements in Pairwise Comparison Method in AHP. Computers and Operations Research, 31(5): 713-719.
33. LESKINEN P & KANGAS J. 2005. Rank reversal in multi-criteria decision analysis with statistical modelling of ratio-scale pairwise comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(7): 855-861.
34. LIBERATORE M & NYDICK R. 2008. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1): 194-207.
35. LIEB R & BENTZ B. 2005. The North Amarican third party logistics in 2004: the provider CEO perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(8): 595-611.
36. LIEB R & BENTZ B. 2006. The 3PL Industry in Asia/Pacific. Supply Chain Management Review, 10(9): 10-15.
37. LIEB R & BUTNER K. 2007. The North American Third-Party Logistics Industry in 2006: The Provider CEO Perspective. Transportation Journal, 46(3): 40-52.
38. OGDEN J. 2006. Supply base reduction: an empirical study of critical success factors. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42(4): 29-39.
39. OMKARPRASAD V & SUSHIL K. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1): 1-29.
40. SAATY T. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3): 234-281.
41. SAATY T. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.
42. SAATY T. 2001. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary? Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process (ISAHP 2001), Bern.
43. SAATY T. 2001. ThesevenpillarsoftheAnalyticHierarchyProcess. MultipleCriteriaDecisionMakingintheNewMillennium. Proceedingsofthe15thInternationalConference, MCDM.M. Köksalan. Berlin, Springer: 15-37.
44. SAATY T. 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1): 85-91.
45. SAATY T & FORMAN E. (1992). The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies. Pittsburgh, RWS Publications.
46. SAATY T & OZDEMIR M. 2003. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3-4): 233-244.
47. SAATY T & VARGAS L. 1984. Comparison of Eigenvalue, Logarithmic Least Squares and Least Squares Methods in Estimating Ratios. Mathematical Modeling, 5(5): 309-324.
48. SAATY T & VARGAS L. 1984. Inconsistency and Rank Preservation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28(2): 205-214.
49. SARKAR A & MOHAPATRA P. 2006. Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(3): 148-163.
50. SHIM J. 1989. Bibliography research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23(3): 161-167.
51. SIPAHI S & TIMOR M. 2010. The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5): 775-808.
52. VARGAS L. 1990. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 2-8.
53. YOKOYAMA M. 1921. The Nature of the affective judgment in the method of paired comparison. The American Journal of Psychology, 32: 357-369.
54. ZAHEDI F. 1986. The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications. Interface, 16(4): 96-108.