Single session family therapy in youth mental health: Can it help?

Australasian Psychiatry

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 108-111

  Hopkins, Liza ^a   Lee, Stuart ^b   McGrane, Tess ^a   Barbara May, Rachel ^a,c  

^a Headspace Elsternwick   (Australia)

^b The Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School ^*  (Australia)

^c Alfred Child and Youth Mental Health Service   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Family therapy; Mental health; Single session therapy; Young people

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FAMILY STUDY; FAMILY THERAPY; HUMAN; JUVENILE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MOTHER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; WELLBEING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD PARENT RELATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FAMILY RELATIONS; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PARENTS; RISK FACTORS; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85020272374     PISSN: 10398562     EISSN: 14401665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1039856216658807     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. King G, Currie M and Petersen P. Review: Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework Child Adolesc Mental Health 2014; 19: 2-8.
2. Rickwood D, Anile G, Telford N, et al. Service Innovation Project Component: Best Practice Framework. Melbourne: headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, 2014.
3. Rickwood D, Telford N, Mazzer K, et al. The services provided to young people by headspace centres in Australia. Med J Aust 2015; 202: 533-537.
4. Young J and Rycroft P. Single Session Therapy: What’s in a name? Aust N Z J Fam Ther 2012; 33: 3-5.
5. Talmon M. When less is more: Lessons from 25 years of attempting to maximise the effect of each (and often only) therapeutic encounter. Aus N Z J Fam Ther 2012; 33:6-14.
6. Bloom B. Focussed Single Session Psychotherapy: A review of the clinical and research literature. Brief Treat Crisis Interv 2001; 1: 75-86.
7. Shepherd G, Boardman J and Slade M. Making recovery a reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008.
8. Andersen T. The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Fam Process 1987 26: 415-428.
9. Gee D, Mildred H, Brann P, et al. Brief intervention: a promising framework for child and youth mental health? Admin Policy Mental Health 2015; 42: 121-125.
10. Duncan B, Miller S, Sparks J, et al. The Session Rating Scale: Preliminary Psychometric Properties of a “Working” Alliance Measure. J Brief Ther 2003; 3: 3-12.
11. Miller S and Bargmann S. The Outcome rating Scale (ORS) and the Session Rating Scale (SRS). Integrating Sci Pract 2012; 2: 28-31.
12. Cummings C, Caporino N, Settipani C, et al. The therapeutic relationship in cognitivebehavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for anxious youth. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013; 81: 859-864.
13. Karver M, Handelsman J, Fields S, et al. Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clin Psychol Rev 2006; 26: 50-65.
14. Del Re A, Flückiger C, Horvath A, et al. Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance - outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis Clin Psychol Rev 2012; 32: 642-649.
15. Martin D, Garske J and Davis M. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 438-450.
16. Slade M, Bird V, Clarke E, et al. Supporting recovery in patients with psychosis using adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): a multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatr 2015; 2: 503-514.